How does a ``cudder" look ?

HOW DOES IT LOOK ?

like shit, as that is what lisp is

http://www.okisoft.co.jp/esc/go/midplisp.html

>>2
Aww, has too much sepples filled your tiny heart with rage?

>>4

(HI (IM(
   A( (LISP( (PROGRAM))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))

>>4
butthurt lispfag?

>>6
Butthurt Ctard ;_;.

>>7
nice try, but c is shit too
not nearly as much as lisp though
the main difference is that people actually use c to program, whereas lisp is to programming as liberal arts is to degrees

>>8
Hackers and painters!

>>9
OMG it maeks sense now!

testing

testing
testing
testing

Banana-shaped.

>>8
C and lisp are just about the only decent languages in existence; therefore, ihbt.

>>13
I feel sorry for you. :(

A cudder looks like a string of cars.
      ---------------       ----------------       -------------------
     | car   | cdr   |     | car    | cdr   |     | car       | cdr   |
     |       |   o-------->|        |   o-------->|           |  nil  |
     |       |       |     |        |       |     |           |       |
      ---------------       ----------------       -------------------

┌─────┬──────┐    ┌─────┬──────┐    ┌─────┬──────┐    ┌─────┬──────┐
│ car │ cdr ─┼───►│ car │ cdr ─┼───►│ car │ cdr ─┼───►│ car │ cdr ─┼───┐
└─────┴──────┘    └─────┴──────┘    └─────┴──────┘    └─────┴──────┘   │
                                                                       │
                                                                     ──┴──
                                                                      nil

>>15
A lisp list is indeed simple, but it may be simple to illustrate it like this:

A cons is a pair of any two items, the first being the car, and the second being the cdr.

A list is a chain of conses:
- the car of the cons is an item
- the cdr of the cons is a list, just like this one, or a NIL which represents the end of the list.

In a more MLish syntax:
List = Cons of Anything * List | Nil

In Common Lisp, NIL also represents the generalized boolean false (a commonly agreed value between functions, which represents boolean false). At the same time, the internal representation of NIL is just normal symbol interned in the COMMON-LISP package, and at the same time, it's agreed for it to represent an empty list.

;(car . cdr) is the dotted representation of a CONS pair = (cons car cdr)
;(a ... b) is a proper list

'() ;=> NIL
'(1) ;=> (1 . NIL)
'(1 2) ;=> (1 . (2)) => (1 . (2 . ())) or (1 . (2 . NIL))
'(A B C); => (A . (B . (C . NIL)))

#'first == #'car
#'rest == #'cdr
#'second == #'cadr == #'(lambda (x) (car (cdr x)))
; and so on...
Lisp lists are very simple as you can see, but it seems they cause trouble for some newbies.

>>16
wow that's cool

┌─────┬──────┐    ┌─────┬──────┐    ┌─────┬──────┐    ┌─────┬──────┐
│ car │ cdr ─┼───►│ car │ cdr ─┼───►│ car │ cdr ─┼───►│ car │ cdr ─┼───┐
└─────┴──────┘    └─────┴──────┘    └─────┴──────┘    └─────┴──────┘   │
                                                                       │
                                                                     ──┴──
                                                                   "GRUNNUR"

>>16
... master...

>>16
Looks like shit in Firefox.

>>21
WORKS IN OPERA

>>22
No it doesn't?

>>23
Another Opera user here, confirmed working.

>>21
Looks fine in Firefox here.

>>25
same here .

>>21
Did you mean looks like shit with my eyesore font because I'm cool and alternative?

I tested it in 3 browsers. Looks perfect, lines up exactly. Top-tier, masterful character work.

By the way, fellow Opera users, use this:

<a title="zap colors" href="opera:/button/Go%20to%20page,%22javascript:(function()%257Bvar%2520newSS%252C%2520styles%253D'*%2520%257B%2520background%253A%2520white%2520!%2520important%253B%2520color%253A%2520black%2520!important%2520%257D%2520%253Alink%252C%2520%253Alink%2520*%2520%257B%2520color%253A%2520%25230000EE%2520!important%2520%257D%2520%253Avisited%252C%2520%253Avisited%2520*%2520%257B%2520color%253A%2520%2523551A8B%2520!important%2520%257D'%253B%2520if(document.createStyleSheet)%2520%257B%2520document.createStyleSheet(%2522javascript%253A'%2522%252Bstyles%252B%2522'%2522)%253B%2520%257D%2520else%2520%257B%2520newSS%253Ddocument.createElement('link')%253B%2520newSS.rel%253D'stylesheet'%253B%2520newSS.href%253D'data%253Atext%252Fcss%252C'%252Bescape(styles)%253B%2520document.getElementsByTagName(%2522head%2522)%255B0%255D.appendChild(newSS)%253B%2520%257D%2520%257D)()%253B%22,,%22Zap%20Colors%22,View">Zap colors</a>
Copy that into an empty html, click on it, click on the link on the page and drag the new button you now have to whatever... just whatever, I don't care. Drag it somewhere. It makes h4x0r pages readable and doesn't have the Readability's quirks.

>>28
This is what Opera users actually believe.

Here is the readable source, for the rightfully paranoid:
javascript:(function(){var newSS, styles='* { background: white ! important; color: black !important } :link, :link * { color: #0000EE !important } :visited, :visited * { color: #551A8B !important }'; if(document.createStyleSheet) { document.createStyleSheet("javascript:'"+styles+"'"); } else { newSS=document.createElement('link'); newSS.rel='stylesheet'; newSS.href='data:text/css,'+escape(styles); document.getElementsByTagName("head")[0].appendChild(newSS); } })();

>>29
Me, I put that shit right next to the "fit to width" button. But you, as a Foxfire user, don't even understand how cool it is.

>>31
Actually I have Opera installed, but I'm scared to attempt to use it lest I throw up into my mouth.

Opera Mini is cool though. Also their embedded / custom stuff (browsers for consoles and the such).

However, for desktop use I just don't see the appeal. I hear it gets used a lot in Россия and its surroundings, not sure what to make out of that.

I need to write my own web browser someday, Firefox is annoying and Opera fucks up quite often recently :S

>>21
Fine here in Firefox in GNU/Linux.

>>33 Have you considered w3m? It works pretty good for me. You could also try uzbl

>>27
Yep, my cool and alternative Courier 13 pt.

With its eyes.

>>37
Terrible!

>>37
Hello Cudder how is the Anonix project coming along?

>>39
s'cool, we just finished transcripting 7th ed from the lion's commentary.

>>39
busy IRL, no time to do anything until december; however, w4lolitaKs has started a project in /jp/

>>41

You've been had, friend

http://anonix.freewebhostx.com/?page_id=3

>>41
Yes, I'd noticed, but I presumed it was a very well developed metatroll and ignored it.

>>41
>busy IRL

stop having a life and join us.

>>44
busy IRL
forgot my space fuck.

>>45
I never had a space fuck :(

One time a girl showed me her "CUDDER".  I put my "GRUNNER" all the way in it.  That was the best night Leah ever had.

[b][i]cudder[/b][/i]

*grabs seven dicks*

>>49
That's rather selfish of you. Didn't they teach you to share in school? Let me guess you went to public school... that explains a lot.

curious?

>>42
Win32
not open source
FFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFF

>>52

I know, right?

SOFTWARE OF THE CENTURY

http://anonix.freewebhostx.com/screens/1.jpg

>>54
It's funny, because it says 'newfag'. Actually, it's EPIC LEGENDARY WIN amirite

>>55

No, it's funny because ANONIX flowered into disgusting and useless dross twice. Two completely unrelated and awful projects.

>>16

Nice Unicode. Epic win.

>>16
/prog/ Pimpest Posts 2009
http://dis.4chan.org/read/prog/1190337245/16

>>57
If you like that, you should see the SICP info pages^[1]


<sub>--
1. http://www.neilvandyke.org/sicp-texi/</sub>


                                        (3 4)
                                          │
                                          │
                                          ▼
((1 2) 3 4)┏━━━┳━━━┓                  ┏━━━┳━━━┓    ┏━━━┳━━━┓
      ────►┃ ● ┃ ●─╂─────────────────►┃ ● ┃ ●─╂───►┃ ● ┃ ╱ ┃
           ┗━┿━┻━━━┛                  ┗━┿━┻━━━┛    ┗━┿━┻━━━┛
             │                          │            │
             ▼                          ▼            ▼
   (1 2)   ┏━━━┳━━━┓    ┏━━━┳━━━┓     ┏━━━┓        ┏━━━┓
      ────►┃ ● ┃ ●─╂───►┃ ● ┃ ╱ ┃     ┃ 3 ┃        ┃ 4 ┃
           ┗━┿━┻━━━┛    ┗━┿━┻━━━┛     ┗━━━┛        ┗━━━┛
             │            │
             ▼            ▼
           ┏━━━┓        ┏━━━┓ 
           ┃ 1 ┃        ┃ 2 ┃
           ┗━━━┛        ┗━━━┛

     Figure 2.5:  Structure formed by (cons (list 1 2) (list 3 4)).

AMAZING ASCII SKILLZ

     *Figure 3.4:* Procedure objects in the global frame.

                    +--------------------------------------------+
                    | sum-of-squares:                            |
          global -->| square:                                    |
          env       | f: --+                                     |
                    +------|--------------+--------------+-------+
                           |     ^        |     ^        |     ^
                           |     |        |     |        |     |
                           V     |        V     |        V     |
                       .---.---. |    .---.---. |    .---.---. |
                       | O | O-+-+    | O | O-+-+    | O | O-+-+
                       `-|-^---'      `-|-^---'      `-|-^---'
                         |              |              |
                         V              V              V
             parameters: a          parameters: x  parameters: x, y
             body: (sum-of-squares  body: (* x x)  body: (+ (square x)
                     (+ a 1)                                (square y))
                     (* a 2))

I smell artist-mode.

>>63
SMELL MY ANUS

>>60
There are gaps between the lines¹. That's terrible!, but what one normally would except.

That makes >>16's achievement even more impressive.

¹Although maybe WebKit will render it gapless, I'm not sure.

>>65
I went for the SICP 1.0 look.

            ( why am i so ugly ?)
           O
          o
 .---.---.
 | O | O |
 `---^---'

Courier has no box drawing characters at all, which explains >>36.

>>60 Looks correct using a good font, however Windows lacks a good font. None of the monospace fonts I tried had the BOX DRAWINGS HEAVY characters (usually just the light versions), nor did they have U+2571 BOX DRAWINGS LIGHT DIAGONAL UPPER RIGHT TO LOWER LEFT, and thus they were linked in from elsewhere, which breaks the alignment (in my tests, the font-linked BOX DRAWINGS HEAVY characters were 20% wider than the width of Consolas characters).

Out of curiosity and perversion, I decided to see what would be necessary to draw it in Consolas. Here is a version which works with only light box drawing characters and ╱ for /. It's not as cool as >>65[rem]-san's because it doesn't mix heavy and light box drawing characters.

[m]                                        (3 4)
                                          │
                                          │
                                          ▼
((1 2) 3 4)┌───┬───┐                  ┌───┬───┐    ┌───┬───┐
      ────►│ ● │ ●─┼─────────────────►│ ● │ ●─┼───►│ ● │ / │
           └─┼─┴───┘                  └─┼─┴───┘    └─┼─┴───┘
             │                          │            │
             ▼                          ▼            ▼
   (1 2)   ┌───┬───┐    ┌───┬───┐     ┌───┐        ┌───┐
      ────►│ ● │ ●─┼───►│ ● │ / │     │ 3 │        │ 4 │
           └─┼─┴───┘    └─┼─┴───┘     └───┘        └───┘
             │            │
             ▼            ▼
           ┌───┐        ┌───┐
           │ 1 │        │ 2 │
           └───┘        └───┘[/m]

The circles don't touch the [m]──►[/m] arrows like they should, though.

>>65 There are small (subpixel) gaps in >>16 when I look at it in Ubanto with DejaVu Sans Mono (with font smoothing on, though Firefox seems to ignore my settings anyway). >>60's also has subpixel gaps for me, but they're small enough that they're almost unnoticable.

Well, that's the last time I trust EXPERT BBCODE FRAMEWORK.

Courier has no box drawing characters at all, which explains >>36.

>>60 Looks correct using a good font, however Windows lacks a good font. None of the monospace fonts I tried had the BOX DRAWINGS HEAVY characters (usually just the light versions), nor did they have U+2571 BOX DRAWINGS LIGHT DIAGONAL UPPER RIGHT TO LOWER LEFT, and thus they were linked in from elsewhere, which breaks the alignment (in my tests, the font-linked BOX DRAWINGS HEAVY characters were 20% wider than the width of Consolas characters).

Out of curiosity and perversion, I decided to see what would be necessary to draw it in Consolas. Here is a version which works with only light box drawing characters and ╱ for /. It's not as cool as >>65-san's because it doesn't mix heavy and light box drawing characters.

                                        (3 4)
                                          │
                                          │
                                          ▼
((1 2) 3 4)┌───┬───┐                  ┌───┬───┐    ┌───┬───┐
      ────►│ ● │ ●─┼─────────────────►│ ● │ ●─┼───►│ ● │ / │
           └─┼─┴───┘                  └─┼─┴───┘    └─┼─┴───┘
             │                          │            │
             ▼                          ▼            ▼
   (1 2)   ┌───┬───┐    ┌───┬───┐     ┌───┐        ┌───┐
      ────►│ ● │ ●─┼───►│ ● │ / │     │ 3 │        │ 4 │
           └─┼─┴───┘    └─┼─┴───┘     └───┘        └───┘
             │            │
             ▼            ▼
           ┌───┐        ┌───┐
           │ 1 │        │ 2 │
           └───┘        └───┘

The circles don't touch the ──► arrows like they should, though.

>>65 There are small (subpixel) gaps in >>16 when I look at it in Ubanto with DejaVu Sans Mono (with font smoothing on, though Firefox seems to ignore my settings anyway). >>60's also has subpixel gaps for me, but they're small enough that they're almost unnoticable.