How does a ``cudder" look ?

HOW DOES IT LOOK ?

>>39
busy IRL, no time to do anything until december; however, w4lolitaKs has started a project in /jp/

>>41

You've been had, friend

http://anonix.freewebhostx.com/?page_id=3

>>41
Yes, I'd noticed, but I presumed it was a very well developed metatroll and ignored it.

>>41
>busy IRL

stop having a life and join us.

>>44
busy IRL
forgot my space fuck.

>>45
I never had a space fuck :(

One time a girl showed me her "CUDDER".  I put my "GRUNNER" all the way in it.  That was the best night Leah ever had.

[b][i]cudder[/b][/i]

*grabs seven dicks*

>>49
That's rather selfish of you. Didn't they teach you to share in school? Let me guess you went to public school... that explains a lot.

curious?

>>42
Win32
not open source
FFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFF

>>52

I know, right?

SOFTWARE OF THE CENTURY

http://anonix.freewebhostx.com/screens/1.jpg

>>54
It's funny, because it says 'newfag'. Actually, it's EPIC LEGENDARY WIN amirite

>>55

No, it's funny because ANONIX flowered into disgusting and useless dross twice. Two completely unrelated and awful projects.

>>16

Nice Unicode. Epic win.

>>16
/prog/ Pimpest Posts 2009
http://dis.4chan.org/read/prog/1190337245/16

>>57
If you like that, you should see the SICP info pages^[1]


<sub>--
1. http://www.neilvandyke.org/sicp-texi/</sub>


                                        (3 4)
                                          │
                                          │
                                          ▼
((1 2) 3 4)┏━━━┳━━━┓                  ┏━━━┳━━━┓    ┏━━━┳━━━┓
      ────►┃ ● ┃ ●─╂─────────────────►┃ ● ┃ ●─╂───►┃ ● ┃ ╱ ┃
           ┗━┿━┻━━━┛                  ┗━┿━┻━━━┛    ┗━┿━┻━━━┛
             │                          │            │
             ▼                          ▼            ▼
   (1 2)   ┏━━━┳━━━┓    ┏━━━┳━━━┓     ┏━━━┓        ┏━━━┓
      ────►┃ ● ┃ ●─╂───►┃ ● ┃ ╱ ┃     ┃ 3 ┃        ┃ 4 ┃
           ┗━┿━┻━━━┛    ┗━┿━┻━━━┛     ┗━━━┛        ┗━━━┛
             │            │
             ▼            ▼
           ┏━━━┓        ┏━━━┓ 
           ┃ 1 ┃        ┃ 2 ┃
           ┗━━━┛        ┗━━━┛

     Figure 2.5:  Structure formed by (cons (list 1 2) (list 3 4)).

AMAZING ASCII SKILLZ

     *Figure 3.4:* Procedure objects in the global frame.

                    +--------------------------------------------+
                    | sum-of-squares:                            |
          global -->| square:                                    |
          env       | f: --+                                     |
                    +------|--------------+--------------+-------+
                           |     ^        |     ^        |     ^
                           |     |        |     |        |     |
                           V     |        V     |        V     |
                       .---.---. |    .---.---. |    .---.---. |
                       | O | O-+-+    | O | O-+-+    | O | O-+-+
                       `-|-^---'      `-|-^---'      `-|-^---'
                         |              |              |
                         V              V              V
             parameters: a          parameters: x  parameters: x, y
             body: (sum-of-squares  body: (* x x)  body: (+ (square x)
                     (+ a 1)                                (square y))
                     (* a 2))

I smell artist-mode.

>>63
SMELL MY ANUS

>>60
There are gaps between the lines¹. That's terrible!, but what one normally would except.

That makes >>16's achievement even more impressive.

¹Although maybe WebKit will render it gapless, I'm not sure.

>>65
I went for the SICP 1.0 look.

            ( why am i so ugly ?)
           O
          o
 .---.---.
 | O | O |
 `---^---'

Courier has no box drawing characters at all, which explains >>36.

>>60 Looks correct using a good font, however Windows lacks a good font. None of the monospace fonts I tried had the BOX DRAWINGS HEAVY characters (usually just the light versions), nor did they have U+2571 BOX DRAWINGS LIGHT DIAGONAL UPPER RIGHT TO LOWER LEFT, and thus they were linked in from elsewhere, which breaks the alignment (in my tests, the font-linked BOX DRAWINGS HEAVY characters were 20% wider than the width of Consolas characters).

Out of curiosity and perversion, I decided to see what would be necessary to draw it in Consolas. Here is a version which works with only light box drawing characters and ╱ for /. It's not as cool as >>65[rem]-san's because it doesn't mix heavy and light box drawing characters.

[m]                                        (3 4)
                                          │
                                          │
                                          ▼
((1 2) 3 4)┌───┬───┐                  ┌───┬───┐    ┌───┬───┐
      ────►│ ● │ ●─┼─────────────────►│ ● │ ●─┼───►│ ● │ / │
           └─┼─┴───┘                  └─┼─┴───┘    └─┼─┴───┘
             │                          │            │
             ▼                          ▼            ▼
   (1 2)   ┌───┬───┐    ┌───┬───┐     ┌───┐        ┌───┐
      ────►│ ● │ ●─┼───►│ ● │ / │     │ 3 │        │ 4 │
           └─┼─┴───┘    └─┼─┴───┘     └───┘        └───┘
             │            │
             ▼            ▼
           ┌───┐        ┌───┐
           │ 1 │        │ 2 │
           └───┘        └───┘[/m]

The circles don't touch the [m]──►[/m] arrows like they should, though.

>>65 There are small (subpixel) gaps in >>16 when I look at it in Ubanto with DejaVu Sans Mono (with font smoothing on, though Firefox seems to ignore my settings anyway). >>60's also has subpixel gaps for me, but they're small enough that they're almost unnoticable.

Well, that's the last time I trust EXPERT BBCODE FRAMEWORK.

Courier has no box drawing characters at all, which explains >>36.

>>60 Looks correct using a good font, however Windows lacks a good font. None of the monospace fonts I tried had the BOX DRAWINGS HEAVY characters (usually just the light versions), nor did they have U+2571 BOX DRAWINGS LIGHT DIAGONAL UPPER RIGHT TO LOWER LEFT, and thus they were linked in from elsewhere, which breaks the alignment (in my tests, the font-linked BOX DRAWINGS HEAVY characters were 20% wider than the width of Consolas characters).

Out of curiosity and perversion, I decided to see what would be necessary to draw it in Consolas. Here is a version which works with only light box drawing characters and ╱ for /. It's not as cool as >>65-san's because it doesn't mix heavy and light box drawing characters.

                                        (3 4)
                                          │
                                          │
                                          ▼
((1 2) 3 4)┌───┬───┐                  ┌───┬───┐    ┌───┬───┐
      ────►│ ● │ ●─┼─────────────────►│ ● │ ●─┼───►│ ● │ / │
           └─┼─┴───┘                  └─┼─┴───┘    └─┼─┴───┘
             │                          │            │
             ▼                          ▼            ▼
   (1 2)   ┌───┬───┐    ┌───┬───┐     ┌───┐        ┌───┐
      ────►│ ● │ ●─┼───►│ ● │ / │     │ 3 │        │ 4 │
           └─┼─┴───┘    └─┼─┴───┘     └───┘        └───┘
             │            │
             ▼            ▼
           ┌───┐        ┌───┐
           │ 1 │        │ 2 │
           └───┘        └───┘

The circles don't touch the ──► arrows like they should, though.

>>65 There are small (subpixel) gaps in >>16 when I look at it in Ubanto with DejaVu Sans Mono (with font smoothing on, though Firefox seems to ignore my settings anyway). >>60's also has subpixel gaps for me, but they're small enough that they're almost unnoticable.