Return Styles: Pseud0ch, Terminal, Valhalla, NES, Geocities, Blue Moon.

Pages: 1-4041-

Can we get an admin/mod to ban this fool?

Name: Anonymous 2007-06-22 4:50 ID:tpURcF4R

Some faggot keeps bumping ancient threads. I say ban his ass, who's with me?

Name: Anonymous 2007-06-22 5:41 ID:92Lc8KXf

Bump

Name: Anonymous 2007-06-22 6:36 ID:wTwA/knI

No law against it. It could even turn out to be a good thing; reminding the denizens of /prog/ that we did in fact use to talk about programming, not just spam stupid memes.

Name: Anonymous 2007-06-22 8:01 ID:Xff9BfoG

I dunno, I liked the past.  If people would stop being such mindless dickheads ("UUUH WHAT LANGAUGE SHUD I USE 1ST??!?!" and "BEST LANGUAGE?") then maybe /prog/ can go back to what it was naturally.  But until people are less stupid, there is no hope.

I hate whoever started this trend, exposing people who have no fucking clue what they're studying and why, to the world of programming.

Name: Anonymous 2007-06-22 8:30 ID:Heaven

I bumped a few ancient threads, but I swear I'm not the guy who wrote "WELCOME TO THE PAST...". So there is more than one guy.

Name: Anonymous 2007-06-22 9:05 ID:fQ+Qia9J

>>5
That's the guy! Mods, you know what to do. Not even Heaven can save you now.

Name: Anonymous 2007-06-22 9:08 ID:Heaven

>>6
ok...
then what about dynamic ip?

Name: Anonymous 2007-06-22 9:15 ID:fQ+Qia9J

>>7
Ban entire network if necessary.

Name: Anonymous 2007-06-22 9:33 ID:92Lc8KXf

>>7
No problem, there's 4 of us and it's unlikely that two of us share the same ISP.

Name: Anonymous 2007-06-22 9:47 ID:Heaven

WELCOME TO THE PRESENT BITCHES, FUCKING SAGE

Name: EXPERT BBCODE PROGRAMMER 2007-06-22 21:37 ID:tj+lyWnr

I'm gonna bump this in 6 months for Anonymous' entertainment.

Name: Anonymous 2007-06-22 21:44 ID:VwAi+9D8

I'm gonna bump this in 6 years for Anonymous' entertainment.

Name: Anonymous 2007-06-22 22:06 ID:41VlVHzS

I'm gonna bump this in 6 decades for Anonymous' entertainment.

Name: Anonymous 2007-06-22 22:08 ID:fQ+Qia9J

I'm gonna bump this in 6 minutes for Anonymous' entertainment.

Name: Anonymous 2007-06-22 22:25 ID:GLRLW8IT

I'm gonna bump this in 6 seconds for Anonymous' enterntainment.

Name: Anonymous 2007-06-22 22:55 ID:41VlVHzS

>>15
You did not

Name: Anonymous 2007-06-23 0:34 ID:c7CCFDSn

>>16
I'm going to track you down, just so I can taunt you in 60 years when you forget to bump this thread.

Name: some faggot 2007-06-23 2:55 ID:QFX0S/jz

bump

Name: Anonymous 2007-06-23 4:12 ID:Heaven

sage

Name: Anonymous 2007-06-23 6:47 ID:4P83UBxL

Ok, even old me is sick and tired of this bumping. I hardly mind any meme and contribute to many, and I even bumped things in the past (months ago), but this is really fucking with /prog, we can't even have fun with memes if shit keeps getting bumped. I suggest we ban the fuck out of the fuckers who were bumping old threads recently, for a week.

Name: Anonymous 2007-06-23 8:03 ID:cdjliF8W

>>20
I suggest you have aids.

Name: Anonymous 2007-06-23 10:43 ID:pqECOtY+

>>17
What if I'm dead ?

Name: Anonymous 2007-06-23 14:40 ID:0LCuSVRG

instead of complaining about bumps, why don't you bring out new content? faggots.

Name: Anonymous 2007-06-23 18:33 ID:fYQSMa6O

I hope your daughter gets raped by negroes on cocaine.

Name: Anonymous 2007-06-23 18:38 ID:4P83UBxL

>>23
When I first read your post, my thoughts were that you in fact not
human, but a chimpanzee that had somehow managed to escape from the
animal nuthouse. Upon closer inspection, I came to realize the
horrible truth. You are without exception the most pitiful and woeful
example of mankind that ever existed. You are the one who puts the
'Homo' in 'Homo sapien'. I am at a loss for words powerful enough to
describe your pathetically sub-par intellect and nealithic
communication skills, so instead you have forced me to rape and murder
several small towns just to block out the extensive amounts of trauma
caused by reading your post. I can only hope that this thread does not
fall into the hands of more innocent victims, and one day, you will
commit suicide in such an horrific manner that it cures some of the
readers' trauma.

Name: Anonymous 2007-06-23 22:15 ID:dpgeDMzL

HOLY SHIAT, my trolling had some effect. I am, in fact, the fag who bumped all those threads. And I'm lol'ing.

Also, I done it because I saw you guys complaining about someone else bumping an old thread. Probably >>5

Thanks for the laughs.

Name: Anonymous 2007-06-23 23:29 ID:FE13VGOw

>>1,26
Same person

Name: Anonymous 2007-06-23 23:34 ID:6Q0MLpWF

    HOLY SHIAT, my trolling had some effect. I am, in fact, the fag who suggests to everyone to read SICP. And I'm cod'ing.

    Also, I done it because I saw you guys complaining about your inability to write a decent enterprise program. Probably >>26

    Thanks for the laughs.

Name: Anonymous 2007-06-24 0:18 ID:F+rNQLSf

mods don't give a shit about textboards, which is why they both fail so hard

Name: Anonymous 2007-06-24 1:34 ID:Bz3Lwuc6

>>29
it's because you can't post something illegal in a textboard (like, Child Porn for example, and yeah -- i know the base64 trick.)

Name: Anonymous 2007-06-24 2:32 ID:lVH5Wwnx

>>26
Actually, I'm the one who invented the bumping of old threads, and I've been doing it for quite a while now.

Name: Anonymous 2007-06-24 11:47 ID:BUJD7ehQ

>>30

Nevertheless, posts have been deleted and IP addresses banned from the textboards. Not recently, but they have.

Name: Anonymous 2007-06-24 14:09 ID:Heaven

Name: Anonymous 2007-06-24 17:06 ID:U9dlWwAN

>>26
I didn't bump that one, I bumped threads a months ago and nobody had complained back then.

>>30
This man speaks the truth. There's quite a lot of work to do in /b, so why bother with a text board which cannot have Picard?

Name: Anonymous 2007-06-25 19:26 ID:zH5jGqRN

>1
>Some faggot keeps bumping me with his ass. I say who's ancient,  ban threads?

Fix'd.

Name: Anonymous 2007-06-25 19:27 ID:Heaven

>>35
Failure of epic proportions. Learn to quote properly.

Name: Anonymous 2007-06-25 19:28 ID:zH5jGqRN

>>36

Not epic.

Name: Anonymous 2007-06-25 19:29 ID:Heaven

>>35,37
Same person

Name: Anonymous 2007-06-25 19:32 ID:zH5jGqRN

>>38

Not obvious.

Name: Anonymous 2007-06-25 19:34 ID:zH5jGqRN

i bumped your ancient mam

Name: Anonymous 2007-06-27 17:54 ID:eLoNhrMN

>>35,37,39,40
same person

Name: Anonymous 2007-06-27 20:08 ID:Heaven

>>41,41,41-41,41
same person

Name: EXPERT BBCODE PROGRAMMER 2007-12-22 21:36

WELCOME TO THE PAST BITCHES, FUCKING BUMP

Name: Anonymous 2007-12-22 21:44

Holy shit, I remember making this thread.

Name: Anonymous 2007-12-22 22:09

>>44
You witty shanker

Name: Anonymous 2007-12-23 13:08

>>44
faggot

Name: Anonymous 2007-12-23 15:09

Toasting in an epic bread

Name: FrozenVoid !FrOzEn2BUo 2009-01-06 6:43

>>25
"describe your pathetically sub-par intellect and nealithic communication skills"(sic).

Name: Anonymous 2009-01-06 6:44

how did this thread get bumped when the last post in it is from 2007?

Name: FrozenVoid !FrOzEn2BUo 2009-01-06 6:52

>>49
I like reading old threads. They are archived for a reason.
That the main advantage /prog/ has over /g/
Every thread is archived and can be replied anytime.
Threads do not expire.

Name: EXPERT BBCODE PROGRAMMER 2009-01-06 7:22

Heeeyyyyyy.... I remember writing the script to wait six months and post to this thread.

Name: FrozenVoid !FrOzEn2BUo 2009-01-06 7:24

>>51
Why do you need a script?
Is this thread somehow important?

Name: Anonymous 2009-01-06 7:29

"who's with me?" lol

Name: Anonymous 2009-01-06 8:50

>>49
I've seen old threads that have been bumped without the oldest post being stamped with a current timestamp. This is the fifth time I've witnessed this event. The other times were on different boards and I have come to conclude that this is either a Shiichan bug or Vacbob-sama has beet tolling us.

Name: Over 54 Thread 2009-01-06 8:51

This thread has over 54 replies.
You can't reply anymore.

Name: Anonymous 2009-01-06 9:06

no u

Name: Anonymous 2009-01-06 9:06

no u

Name: Anonymous 2009-03-06 8:05

HOW about inserting something   along the lines   of if kbhit?

Name: Anonymous 2011-03-28 17:17

bump, can we do something about this fool, please?

Name: Anonymous 2011-03-28 17:35

Who did this?

Name: VIPPER 2011-03-28 17:44

Name: Anonymous 2011-03-29 0:57

>>62
By the three person lemma I say it was the Sussman trolling us all.

Don't change these.
Name: Email:
Entire Thread Thread List