Too bad C is fast as virgin fuck

Anyways, please listen to me. Not that it's really related to this profile.
I went to /prog/ a while ago; you know, world4chan?
Well anyways there was an insane number of C programmers resolving memory leaks there, and I couldn't post.
Then, I looked at a stickied thread, and it had "CFLAGS tutorial" written on it.
Oh, the stupidity. Those idiots.
You, don't come to /prog/ just because it's got a CFLAGS tutorial, fool.
It's only CFLAGS, CFLAGS are a workaround for crying out loud.
There're even entire teams here. Team of 6, all out for some m4d CFLAGS, huh? How fucking nice.
"Alright, I'm gonna compile with -O4 -malicious-double!" God I can't bear to watch.
You people, I'll give you algorithm help if you get out of my Internet.
/prog/ should be a bloody place.
That tense atmosphere, where two nerds on opposite sides of the thread can start a fight over the forced indentation of code at any time,
the stab-or-be-stabbed mentality, that's what's great about this place.
People with lives should screw off and stay home.
Anyways, I was about to start trolling, and then the bastard beside me goes "-fpie-extensions and -ffaggot-protector, with extra security."
Who in the world uses insecure languages nowadays, you moron?
I want to ask him, "do you REALLY want to compile it with extra security?"
I want to interrogate him. I want to interrogate him for roughly an hour.
Are you sure you don't just want to try saying "I'd better use Haskell for this"?
Coming from a /prog/ veteran such as myself, the latest trend among us vets is this, virtual machines.
That's right, programs running in virtual machines. This is the vet's way of programming.
Using a virtual machine means your program doesn't have direct access to the system. But on the other hand the program runs a tad slower. This is the key.
And then, it's Rapid Application Development. This is unbeatable.
However, if you use this then there is danger that you'll be marked by the process scheduler from next time on; it's a double-edged sword.
I can't recommend it to amateurs.
What this all really means, though, is that you, should just stick with today's special.

this modded copypasta is fucking win

Anyways, >>2, please listen to me. Not that it's really related to this thread. I went to /prog a while ago; you know, world4ch? Well anyways there were an insane number of Haskell programmers in there, and I couldn't post. Then, I googled for the Haskell homepage, and it had "PURELY FUNCTIONAL PROGRAMMING LANGUAGE" written on it. Oh, the stupidity. Those idiots. You don't use a programming language just because it s purely functional, fool. It's only referential transparency, FORCED NO SIDE EFFECTS for crying out loud. There're even companies using it. Company of 400 employees, all downloading some Haskell compiler, huh? How fucking nice. Alright, my manager's gonna use Haskell for the whole project. God I can't bear to watch. You people, I'll give you a damn purely functional language for FREE if you stop fagging up my /prog. /prog should be a bloody place. The tense atmosphere, where two guys on opposite sides of an open discussion can start a fight over VIM vs Emacs at any time, the stab-or-be-stabbed mentality, that's what's great about this place. Haskell fags should screw off and stay home. Anyways, I was about to discuss dynamic typing, and then the bastard beside me goes programming, with Haskell. Who in the world uses Haskell, you moron? I want to ask him, do you REALLY want to use Haskell? I want to interrogate him. I want to interrogate him for roughly an hour. Are you sure you don't just want to try saying Haskell? Coming from a expert programmer such as myself, the latest trend among us vets is this, multi-paradigm languages. That's right, multi-paradigm languages. This is the vet's way of programming. Multi-paradigm languages means more functionality than fappage. But on the other hand the theoretical correctness is a tad lower. This is the key. And then, it's powerful. This is unbeatable. However, if you try this then there is danger that you'll be marked by trolls from next time on; it s a double-edged sword. I can't recommend it to amateurs. What this all really means, though, is that you, >>2, should just stick with today's special.

>>1
Too bad runtime environements are slow as fuck go make a shitty os with your shitty java

Anyways, >>4, please listen to me. Not that it's really related to this thread.  You are a faggot.  What this all really means, though, is that you, >>4, should just stick with today's special.

Optimized:
>>4 you are a faggot

Too bad I come from a land down under, where women glow and men plunder.

>>1
Simulation is useful not only for verifying the correctness of a proposed machine design but also for measuring the machine's performance. For example, we can install in our simulation program a ``meter'' that measures the number of stack operations used in a computation. To do this, we modify our simulated stack to keep track of the number of times registers are saved on the stack and the maximum depth reached by the stack, and add a message to the stack's interface that prints the statistics, as shown below. We also add an operation to the basic machine model to print the stack statistics, by initializing the-ops in make-new-machine to

(list (list 'initialize-stack
            (lambda () (stack 'initialize)))
      (list 'print-stack-statistics
            (lambda () (stack 'print-statistics))))

IVE READ SCIP

>>8
is that even relevant to the topic or is it just your way of saying "IVE READ SICP"?

I write many programs in C. I prefer not to have to rely on Microshaft for my softwares.

I prefer to have to rely on Microshaft for my soft warez.

Over the past year I've been trying to lie to myself, to think on something else, even got laid and tried to fall in love with girls, anything but admitting what I, deep down inside, already knew.

I love my Alan Cox. Not in the way most brothers love each other, but in the way a man loves a man. Not because of some silly fetish either; when I say love, I mean real, "I'll go to the end of the world for you" love.

My Alan is only some decades older than me, making him 80, and currently doesn't have a boyfriend. He's pretty, at least to my eyes, but this is not fueling this. It's his personality. I like no other boy this much. We always had a lot of chemistry,  it's as if we were engineered to be together. Only we happened to share our parents. I'm sure if we had been born in different families, we would be the happiest couple in the world right now.

Lately, I realized I could not give up on this, but I'm kind of scared. I know this is fucked up. But I don't know what to do. I've been avoiding him for a couple of weeks, and this is causing him suffering, which in turn breaks my heart. I don't know if I should confess my love and face the consequences of experiencing a kind of love that's considered unacceptable in our society, even from him, or just let it pass and die inside.

Help me /prog/, what should I do? I think he may be feeling something similar for me becuase we are very close and he considers me attractive, but I don't know to what extent this may only be wishful thinking on my part. Knowing him, I'm sure he won't be angry at me if I tell him how I feel, but I don't know for sure if he'll feel the same about me. I'm positive our parents and everybody else in our family and community will oppose such love, but if he loves me, I'm willing to face all of them or move to some other country to start a new life with him. But I wouldn't want to put pressure on him or make him feel uneasy, so while I think I should confess, I'm not 100% sure and I don't know to what extent what I think is distorted by my strong affection for him.

>>1,3
Fucking win

WHBTC

<-- check em dubz

Bringing /prog/ back to its people
All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy