Return Styles: Pseud0ch, Terminal, Valhalla, NES, Geocities, Blue Moon. Entire thread

C and C++ are for retards.

Name: Anonymous 2007-03-11 8:08 ID:CGOEr2/y

and the speed you gain by using them doesn't matter shit these days unless you're making the latest and greatest 3D game.

Fucking manual memory management. Fuck in the ass.

Name: Anonymous 2009-03-06 6:58

Buf 32 char strs?

Name: Anonymous 2010-12-17 1:31

Xarn is a bad boyfriend

Name: Anonymous 2011-01-05 22:38

This post brought to you by the Gay Nigger Association of America

Name: Anonymous 2011-01-05 22:38

This post brought to you by the Gay Nigger Association of America

Name: Anonymous 2011-01-06 5:24

Bitches don't know 'bout my RAII

Name: Anonymous 2011-01-06 5:30

(with-malloc ((a _int 1)
              (b _int 1))
   ...) ; a and b auto-freed! does Lisp have ANII like sepples now?

Name: Anonymous 2011-01-06 5:56

>>8
You can do something like that when using the FFI(semi-portable), but most objects (outside of FFI use) are either stack-alloced or GC'able. Of course, if you need more detailed GC/allocation control, implementations tend to give it to you through less portable means.

Name: Anonymous 2011-01-06 5:56

I meant >>88

Name: Anonymous 2011-01-06 6:09

>>89
Of couse most objects are handled by the GC, Lisp is a superior language.
I was referring to when you have to work with libraries written in C or inferior languages such C++. (through FFI)

Name: Anonymous 2011-01-06 6:32

I like both LISP and C++ and 5 years ago I'd say LISP and C

I like LISP for its productivity and it's programmer friendliness, and I like C++ for providing all the tools you need to write optimized, low footprint projects.

Bitches don't know about my billion dollar microcontroller industry.
Bitches don't know about my billion dollar smartphone industry
Bitches don't know about my billion dollar operating system industry
Bitches don't know about my billion dollar videogame and media industry

etc

Name: Anonymous 2011-01-06 6:39

>>92
LISP and C++
IHBT

Name: Anonymous 2011-01-06 6:43

>>91
Yes, you can do that when working with an FFI. ( See CFFI or UFFI, or specific implementations if those are not enough for you)

Name: Anonymous 2011-01-06 6:54

>>94
Racket's FFI is enough, thanks.

Name: Anonymous 2011-01-06 7:02

>>93

You have not been trolled my child, for I am king "faggot"

Name: Anonymous 2011-01-06 7:32

>>95
Different languages, different FFI's.

Name: Anonymous 2011-01-06 7:46

``I believe that human being and C++ programmers can coexist peacefully.'' -- President.

Name: Anonymous 2011-01-06 7:57

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fatal_familial_insomnia
LISP IS MURDER

Name: Anonymous 2011-01-06 8:23

>>97
FFI's
Faggot.

Name: Anonymous 2011-01-06 13:09

>>1
Enjoy your Java, implemented in Python, run in a C# VM, written in Haskell, implemented in Visualbasic, implemented in LITHP, implemented in PHP, compiled in PHP, re-implemented in PHP, optimized in PHP, OMG OPTIMIZED in PHP, implemented in JavaScript, re-re-re-re-re-re-re-re-re-re-re-re-re-re-re-re-re-re-re-re-re-re-re-re-implemented in Bash, compiled by a Pascal Compiler.

Name: Anonymous 2011-01-06 13:11

>>101
Your mean ``Enjoy your Lisp, compiled to native code, with garbage collection, macros, code=data, car and cudder.''

Name: Anonymous 2011-01-06 13:48

>>102
And you wonder why noone likes you.

Name: Anonymous 2011-03-17 21:46

pure bitching by c/c++/c#/ocaml what have you retards, Lisp and clojure rock!!!

Name: Anonymous 2011-03-17 22:14

>>104
clojure
Fuck you.

Name: Anonymous 2011-03-18 5:06

>>102
U mena (set! code data)?

Name: Anonymous 2011-03-18 8:56

>>106
No, (eq? code data)

Name: Anonymous 2011-03-18 11:33

>>107
so code==data?

Name: Anonymous 2011-03-18 11:38

>>2
And nothing of the value have you lost.

Name: Anonymous 2011-03-18 11:52

>>108
Von Neumann Speakenspiel, that fiend! He proved that in 1946 and he's been coasting on it ever since!

Name: Anonymous 2011-03-18 12:20

>>108
eq? is not your dirty operator==.

Name: Anonymous 2011-03-18 12:24

>>111
You thought I was using Sepples? Get the fuck out, what kind of non-entity do you think I am?

Name: Anonymous 2011-03-18 13:30

I don't understand. Why do people always rant about THE FORCED MANAGEMENT OF MEMORY in C? It is extremely easy to do.

Name: Anonymous 2011-03-18 13:30

>>113
fuck you autist

Name: Anonymous 2011-03-18 13:33

>>113
So is fucking an autistic nigger, but people don't do that.

Name: Anonymous 2011-03-18 15:36

>>114-115
Wait, something's wrong here, you two are right.

Name: Anonymous 2011-03-18 19:52

>>116
Go away, quote-optimizing man. Nobody likes the records that you play.

>>113
There are a lot of morons in this world who can't accept that different solutions are better tasked to different problems.

Unsurprisingly, most of them believe that imperative programming is wrong.

Also unsurprisingly, most of them don't clean their rooms when their parents tell them to.

Name: Anonymous 2011-03-18 20:04

>>113
It's not about difficulty, it's about whether or not it should be necessary.

Name: Anonymous 2011-03-18 21:42

>>118
So if problem "should" not exist, is better to pretend it doesn't ??

Name: Anonymous 2011-03-18 22:29

>>119
Yes! Like debugging!
Newer Posts
Don't change these.
Name: Email:
Entire Thread Thread List
All trademarks and copyrights on this site are owned by their respective parties. All comments and posts are the responsibility of their own posters.
- Tinychan + 2ch Mode -