Return Styles: Pseud0ch, Terminal, Valhalla, NES, Geocities, Blue Moon.

Pages: 1-

gcc 4.0.x with Dev-C++ ide... safe?

Name: Anonymous 2006-05-14 6:27

Is there any specific, technical reason Dev-C++ includes mingw-gcc 3.4.2, or is it safe to overwrite gcc 3.4.2 with gcc 4.0.2?

Any compiler flags 4.0.2 has deprecated that Dev-C++ assumes exists, etc?

Name: Anonymous 2006-05-14 8:33

Is there any specific, technical reason Dev-C++ includes mingw-gcc 3.4.2

It's because Dev-C++ sucks.

Name: Anonymous 2006-05-14 8:42

Dev-C++ isn't that bad actually. I've used a few and it's my favourite

Name: Anonymous 2006-05-14 8:44

I haven't been paying Dev-C++ much attention recently, but it seems from the outside that the development has pretty much died.

Also, last time I used the IDE, it didn't even play properly with the mingw compiler it came with in the first place. I spent a couple hours trying to figure out which option in the GUI was sending obsolete options to the compiler.

Name: Anonymous 2006-05-14 11:27

Dev-C++ is deprecated, use Code::Blocks

Name: Anonymous 2006-05-14 15:21

>>5

I heard Code::Blocks is stable on its Windows port but tends to seg fault often on its Linux port.  I'll wait until both of its ports are a little more stable.

Worst comes to worst I'll just use emacs for both platforms.

Name: Anonymous 2006-05-14 15:36

A
 
A
n
j
u
t
a
 
i
s
 
f
i
n
e
 
t
o
o

Name: Anonymous 2006-05-14 16:43

>>6

I only tried the SVN version, it works pretty well, but I prefer Kdevelop as an IDE anyway. But most fo the time, I use Emacs too.

Name: Anonymous 2006-05-14 21:10

>>7
Isn't Anjuta also kinda dead?

Name: Anonymous 2006-05-15 3:22

>>9 If it is, this is the first I've heard of it.

Name: Anonymous 2006-05-15 5:45

>>10
The last release was 2.0.1, a development release, almost a year ago.

So long to update a develop branch? This isn't stable.

Name: Anonymous 2006-05-15 6:54

>>11 I see. Serves me right for using Debian, then.

Name: Anonymous 2006-05-15 16:27

I find it hard to believe there's no C++ IDE that's as decent as SharpDevelop is for C#.  SharpDevelop IDE > any C++ IDE, despite that C++ > C#.

Name: Anonymous 2006-05-15 17:18

Any language sufficiently complicated as to require an IDE is too complicated.

Name: Anonymous 2006-05-15 17:30

>>14 Age for truth, FreeBASIC is superior!

Name: Anonymous 2006-05-15 19:02

>>13
vim is great and it has completion.

>>15
http://gambas.sf.net/ is good too.

Name: Anonymous 2006-05-16 3:49

>>14
Agree

>>16
vim is a piece of shit alright

Name: Anonymous 2006-05-16 4:53

>>14

Which narrows it down to Prolog.

And Prolog sucks.

Name: Anonymous 2006-05-17 10:45

>>17
vim may not be good for you but it definitely is for me, especially through ssh connections.

Name: Anonymous 2006-05-17 10:48 (sage)

>>17
>I'm too stupid to learn a text editor

Fix'd. Bitch.

Name: Anonymous 2006-05-17 11:49

>>19-20
Same person

>>19
mcedit works over ssh, unless you have some problem with the function keys because of that big fucking mess fucking terminals are.

Of course, if mcedit won't work, all you're left with is vim, but it should be your last resort, as in "using this shit cause it's all I have, I hate my life".

>>20
I've learnt to use good editors. I know how to do basic things and clipboard at vim for emergency cases, but I won't waste my time learning shitty braindead editors like vim. Unix people should learn what a good text editor is.

Name: Anonymous 2006-05-17 15:22 (sage)

>>21

LEIK EMACS? M-x LOL

Name: Anonymous 2006-05-17 17:21 (sage)

>>21
mc-4.6.1_3.tbz      1.9 MB (1,989,967 B)
nvi-1.81.5_3.tbz    366.0 KB (374,819 B)
OH SHI-

Name: Anonymous 2006-05-19 6:21

nvi is a pretty poor cousin of vim...

Even if vim is lol hueg, it's actually useful.

Name: Anonymous 2006-05-19 7:40

>>22
Who said emacs is good; emacs sucks even larger and harder than vim.

>>23
OH SHI, 1.9 MEGA BYTES FOR A COMPLETE FILE MANAGER, FTP CLIENT, SHELL TRANSFER CLIENT, EDITOR, VIEWER, HEX VIEWER, SYNTAX HIGHLIGHTER AND MORE-

Name: Anonymous 2006-05-19 9:18 (sage)

>>24
what?
nvi is much better than slow-ass vim and it's millions of features i'll never use. elvis has all the features of vim that i occasionally might want to use (tab completion, syntax highliting), without all the lol hueg

>>25
FILE MANAGER,
ls, mv, cp, rm, etc.
FTP CLIENT,
lukemftp
>SHELL TRANSFER CLIENT,
wtf is that?
>EDITOR,
nvi
>VIEWER,
you mean like cat? or are you talking about something else?
>HEX VIEWER, SYNTAX HIGHLIGHTER
elvis

Name: Anonymous 2006-05-19 9:31

>>26
vim, slow? Maybe on a PDP11...

Name: Anonymous 2006-05-19 10:12

SHELL TRANSFER CLIENT,
wtf is that?

scp or the like I assume.

Name: Anonymous 2006-05-19 11:32

>>26
Far more comfortable and productive than ls, mv, cp, rm, etc. without being less powerful. Unified interface with FTP, SMB, FISH, etc.

Shell link is FIle transfer over SHell filesystem (AKA FISH). You can use it as a SCP with FTP-like features which are nicely integrated in your file manager.

I mean a full-fledged viewer complete with regex search and external commands which can be used to filter the file based on type (like w3m or elinks to filter HTML).

You can have all these utilities, or a single Swiss Army Knife that works over SSH and is pretty productive.

I recommend you to try Midnight Commander (mc), for your own good, once you're used to it you'll be more productive dealing with files. I use it all the time. It's like two interactive ls where you easily select files (or use a pattern to un/select them), then you can edit, view, rename, delete, etc. them with a single function key, or copy/move them to the other panel. It also supports archives, which are shown as directories. And a good searcher.

On Windows you have FAR Manager, MC's big brother. It's even better, it has a million features, fits in a diskette, can be customized, has a plugin API so you can write your shit on it, and has plugins to walk through and control all sorts of things: processes, print jobs, recycle bin, registry, NT services, etc.

You end up memorizing key patterns to do stuff which you execute like fighting game combos.

Name: Anonymous 2006-05-19 12:51

>>29
mc kicks ass because you can select various files in various directories and then execute a shell command on them

wish there was a graphical version like gvim

Name: Anonymous 2006-05-19 13:26

>>29
Shell link is FIle transfer over SHell filesystem (AKA FISH). You can use it as a SCP with FTP-like features which are nicely integrated in your file manager.

Like SSHFS (check it out if you haven't tried it, http://fuse.sourceforge.net/sshfs.html)?

Name: Anonymous 2006-05-19 19:43

>>30
A graphical version of it? What'd be the point?

>>31
Seems like it. SSHFS seems to mount what MC handles for you.

Name: Anonymous 2006-05-20 4:11

>>32
To act as the filemanager for GNOME; or at least that's what they tried to pawn gmc off as before they settled on nautilus. Hard to imagine that nautilus was actually an *improvement*! **shudders remembering gmc**

Name: Anonymous 2006-05-20 4:37

>>32

well, i'd like a windows version, i guess, to be more specific, where i can drag and drop files to the panes (sort of like winscp3 but with a command line)

Name: Anonymous 2006-05-20 11:05

Drag an drop and graphic file managers kinda fail. They're so slow and tiresome to use, and they usually miss features like anything that deals with regular expressions.

Name: Anonymous 2006-05-20 14:08

>>35
Try rox-filer, you'll love it.

Name: Anonymous 2010-06-07 6:40

Hi, I can spam /prog/ too, you faggot.

Also, smoke weed everyday.

Name: Anonymous 2011-02-04 19:01

Name: Sgt.Kabu䤯kimanꀭᓱ 2012-05-28 18:51

Bringing /prog/ back to its people
All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy
All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy
All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy
All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy
All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy
All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy
All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy
All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy
All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy
All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy
All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy
All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy
All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy
All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy
All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy
All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy
All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy
All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy
All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy
All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy
All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy
All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy
All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy
All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy
All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy
All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy

Don't change these.
Name: Email:
Entire Thread Thread List