Markupbation

I converted an archive page to XHTML 2.0. [...] I had to do some coding to get the links to work. For IE6 I made an HTC behavior that creates handlers for mouse events (yuck). For Mozilla I made an XBL binding that adds XLink attributes. And Opera 6 has CSS extensions for links.

Well genius, wasn't the page working in all browsers in HTML 4.01 transitional with no ugly hacks, plus it was smaller and rendered faster? Why do all that shit? Because XHTML is l33t because X stands for eXtensible and it's XML?

Discuss web semantics/XHTML/etc. wankery vs. "it works lol".

HTML 4.01 transitional doesn't works in IE without ugly hacks.

IT SCALES BETTAR!

way to bump 2 year old post.

>>4
Fuck off, stop trolling, G.J. Sussman. >.<

>>4
Wait, I lolled.

Extensions For the line   when youve been   working with it   I see of   no way to   lock yourself out   of otherwise interesting?

Hi, I can spam /prog/ too, you faggot.

Also, smoke weed everyday.