Name: Anonymous 2006-04-28 18:44
I converted an archive page to XHTML 2.0. [...] I had to do some coding to get the links to work. For IE6 I made an HTC behavior that creates handlers for mouse events (yuck). For Mozilla I made an XBL binding that adds XLink attributes. And Opera 6 has CSS extensions for links.
Well genius, wasn't the page working in all browsers in HTML 4.01 transitional with no ugly hacks, plus it was smaller and rendered faster? Why do all that shit? Because XHTML is l33t because X stands for eXtensible and it's XML?
Discuss web semantics/XHTML/etc. wankery vs. "it works lol".
Well genius, wasn't the page working in all browsers in HTML 4.01 transitional with no ugly hacks, plus it was smaller and rendered faster? Why do all that shit? Because XHTML is l33t because X stands for eXtensible and it's XML?
Discuss web semantics/XHTML/etc. wankery vs. "it works lol".