ITT we praise Vim
1
Name:
Anonymous
2006-03-28 9:46
The . command, are you man enough to use it?
2
Name:
Anonymous
2006-03-28 9:54
No. sorry.
3
Name:
Anonymous
2006-03-28 10:02
4
Name:
Anonymous
2006-03-28 10:46
5
Name:
Anonymous
2006-03-28 11:12
Vim is fast to edit in. Much faster than emacs, but when I'm programming I don't really need speed there. I need power related to diffs and patches, vim lacks that.
6
Name:
Anonymous
2006-03-28 12:40
vim sucks fat, hairy, greasy, oozy, smelly monkey balls.
7
Name:
Anonymous
2006-03-28 12:54
>>4
No, wait, come back :'(
>>5
I like the diff view, and DirDiff.
Sure, could be better, but it's good enough for when I need it.
>>6
No, it doesn't. A computer program cannot do that, unless it controls hardware, like Emacs.
8
Name:
Anonymous
2006-03-28 13:58
>>7
ediff is far superior to vim's
9
Name:
Anonymous
2006-03-28 14:09
10
Name:
Anonymous
2006-03-28 14:39
(sage)
11
Name:
Anonymous
2006-03-28 15:22
12
Name:
Anonymous
2006-03-28 16:58
vim can execute external programs, if you want ediff.
13
Name:
Anonymous
2006-03-28 17:24
>>12
Execute emacs from within Vim? Blasphemy!
14
Name:
Anonymous
2006-03-28 22:34
Ajax > Vim
15
Name:
Anonymous
2006-03-28 23:21
jsvi > vim
16
Name:
Anonymous
2006-03-29 1:19
Notepad > All
17
Name:
Anonymous
2006-03-29 2:52
* > All
18
Name:
Anonymous
2006-03-29 5:50
ed > Vim > *
19
Name:
Anonymous
2006-03-29 9:38
HA THERE IS NOTHING TO PRAISE YHBT
20
Name:
Anonymous
2006-03-29 16:01
HAND > YHBT > YHL
21
Name:
Anonymous
2006-03-29 19:10
(sage)
I write with my penis
22
Name:
Anonymous
2006-03-30 1:29
Vagina > writing with your penis
23
Name:
Anonymous
2006-03-30 9:59
MAN! The . command sure is powerful! I never have to repeat an action, I laugh at the Emacs (and worse) users that have to actually press more than one key to do anything.
24
Name:
Anonymous
2006-03-30 10:26
(sage)
.
25
Name:
Anonymous
2006-03-30 12:27
dG:x
26
Name:
Anonymous
2006-03-30 16:30
^X^EM^xwankwnakwank^WM^p
27
Name:
Anonymous
2006-03-30 16:36
28
Name:
Anonymous
2006-03-30 16:40
nvi > vim
29
Name:
Anonymous
2006-03-30 17:27
me = noob => vim = hard
30
Name:
Anonymous
2006-03-30 19:11
>>29
PRESS BUTAN => RECEEV PROGRAM
IT DOESNT GET ANY EASIER
31
Name:
Anonymous
2006-03-30 20:18
I was using Notepad today at work and kept typing [esc][esc]:wq to save, rather than [alt]f s
32
Name:
Anonymous
2006-03-31 2:19
>>31
save in vi:
[esc] then : then w
save in notepad:
ctrl-s
33
Name:
Anonymous
2006-03-31 2:24
34
Name:
Anonymous
2006-03-31 2:57
>>31
Yeah, it's sooooo nice to type 5 keys instead of what you'd do with a 2 key combination in a decent editor. It's soooo nice to... wait, this is a troll.
35
Name:
Anonymous
2006-03-31 5:42
>>31,32,34
omagad u nubletz
To save, in insert mode, do this:
^O:w\n (4 keys)
or save and quit
^OZZ (3 keys)
You could even bind ^S in insert mode to :w if you wanted. I just noticed that it was unused, so I might do just that.
36
Name:
Anonymous
2006-03-31 5:44
>>33
I bet you couldn't rebind keys in Notepad, huh?, PUNK!!
37
Name:
Anonymous
2006-03-31 5:55
38
Name:
Anonymous
2006-03-31 6:19
>>37
Enjoy your M-F M-S for saving!! At least in some versions.
39
Name:
Anonymous
2006-03-31 8:33
>>38
What the fuck is "M-"? My keyboard doesn't have any Meta keys, you Unix fuckface!
40
Name:
Anonymous
2006-03-31 8:33
>>39
It's emacs fanboyese for alt.
Newer Posts