Return Styles: Pseud0ch, Terminal, Valhalla, NES, Geocities, Blue Moon.

Pages: 1-4041-8081-

Web Browser Compatability

Name: Anonymous 2006-03-15 17:02

When doing a website, do you think it's right to be code for only certain browser (ie the most used browsers like Firefox & IE (latest ver)) and to just say to other users of browsers like Safari, IE 5 , "sorry you cant use this site"

Name: Anonymous 2006-03-15 17:12 (sage)

Obvious troll.

No, it's not ok.

Name: Anonymous 2006-03-15 18:10

>>1
It's ok to read the User-Agent and if he's using MSIE, send a Location: www.getfirefox.com . Then you only have to bother about making a website that's standards compilant, and all of your users will support it.

Name: Anonymous 2006-03-15 19:59 (sage)

Cutting off 97% of the web from visiting your site is a great idea!

Name: Anonymous 2006-03-15 22:03

>>4

Are you new here? It would be a fucking great thing.

Name: Anonymous 2006-03-16 1:50

Fuck the design, as long as I can read shit, it's cool.

Name: Anonymous 2006-03-16 3:08

We have web standards so that we don't need to code for a specific browser. It's the browser's responsibility to meet standards, not the web designer to implement hacks to work around half a dozen mutually broken browsers.

Name: Anonymous 2006-03-16 5:41

>>4
Yes it is, people who use MSIE are morons and I don't want morons on my web sight wasting my bandwidth.

>>7
Signed.

Name: Anonymous 2006-03-17 22:56

>>6
People like you are the reason why three-fourths of Web pages are shit.

Name: Anonymous 2006-03-18 12:47

>>9
Whatever.

Name: Anonymous 2006-03-19 2:14

>>1
If you had to pick, choose opera when testing your webpages. it's the most compliant browser out there. Firefox actually sucks and IE owns firefox in so many ways.

I'd better leave now because I hear some linux fags chanting "GEE PEE EL! GEE PEE EL!" in the background.

Name: Anonymous 2006-03-19 3:25

>>11
opera rocks just like how lynx rocks.

Name: Anonymous 2006-03-19 4:07

links > lynx, you heathen.

Name: Anonymous 2006-03-19 6:14 (sage)

>>11
Failfux is MPL you fag.

Name: Anonymous 2006-03-19 7:08

>>13
ELinks > Links.

Name: Anonymous 2006-03-19 9:24 (sage)

>>15
Elinks is pretty good actually, yeah.

Name: Anonymous 2006-03-19 14:47

If you had to pick, choose opera when testing your webpages. it's the most compliant browser out there.
konqueror

>>12,13,15,16
w3m

Name: Anonymous 2006-03-20 6:39

>>17
w3m sucks, it lies about being able to support images on the console.

Name: Anonymous 2006-03-20 10:38

links -g on the other hand does do images in console.

Name: Anonymous 2006-03-20 12:07 (sage)

>>2 is right, >>1 is very bad troll...

Name: Anonymous 2006-03-22 14:50

>>18
w3m DOES display images on the console. Works for me.

Name: Anonymous 2006-03-22 15:41 (sage)

>>21
I bet you use X.

Name: Anonymous 2006-03-22 21:40

If you're talking about following standards, and then restrict users to only Fire-"I can't pass ACID2"-fox and MSIE, you're shooting yourself in the foot.

Name: Anonymous 2006-03-23 23:47

>>19
.===>  svgalib-1.4.3_5 is only for i386, and you are running amd64.
>*** Error code 1

Name: Anonymous 2006-03-24 0:30

Code only for Firefox. Ban all IE users from your website.

Name: Anonymous 2006-03-24 1:00

Code only for Lynx. Ban all Firefox users from your website.

Name: Anonymous 2006-03-24 3:28

Code only for wget. Ban all Lynx users from your website.

Name: Anonymous 2006-03-24 6:36

Code only for telnet. Ban all wget users from your website.

Name: Anonymous 2006-03-24 6:56

Code only for MS Word. Ban all Internet users from your web sight.

Name: Anonymous 2006-03-24 7:08

Code only for UDP. Ban all TCP users from your website.

Name: Anonymous 2006-03-24 7:15

Code only for IP. Ban all transport layer users from your website.

Name: Anonymous 2006-03-24 8:03

Code only for 127.0.0.1. Ban your network cable.

Name: Anonymous 2006-03-24 14:55

Code only for /dev/null. Ban all other devices from your website.

Name: Anonymous 2006-03-24 16:56

>>33
The thread is now over.

Name: Anonymous 2006-03-24 17:40

Don't code at all. Ban everyone.

Name: Anonymous 2006-03-24 19:23 (sage)

>>34
Good job bumping it.

Name: Anonymous 2010-05-13 22:43

>>36
No THIS is a good job bumping it.

Name: Anonymous 2010-05-13 22:56

>>37
Dude, seriously...

Name: Anonymous 2010-05-13 23:06

>>23
ACID2?  Firefox passed that a long time ago.  ACID3, thus far, has yet to be passed perfectly by Firefox.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Acid3#Browsers_that_pass

Name: Anonymous 2010-05-13 23:30

>>39
[b]23  Name: Anonymous : 2006-03-22 21:40

Just throwing that out there.

Name: Anonymous 2010-05-13 23:38

>>40
I know.  Since Thread Necromancy was already cast, I thought I'd bring up ACID3 rather than waste a new thread.

Name: Anonymous 2010-05-13 23:50

>>41
Okay... but you didn't state anything aside from common knowledge. I don't get it. Are you the guy that usually makes new threads stating the painfully obvious or something?

Name: Anonymous 2010-05-14 1:16

>>39
The first nightly build of Firefox that passed Acid2 happened twenty days after the post you're replying to. For official releases, it would take until June 2008, which I wouldn't call ``a long time ago''. Particularly since that was over three years after the release of Acid2.

Name: Anonymous 2010-05-14 1:21

>>42
I haven't made a new thread on /prog/ in months.  On the same hand, I don't initiate Thread Necromancy (or meme spam) either.
Just thought I'd bring up ACID3 and see if anyone really had something to contribute since an otherwise useless thread would waste space on the front page for a while anyway ...

Name: Anonymous 2010-05-14 2:24

>>44
Sure, but... oh forget it.

Name: Anonymous 2010-05-14 8:30

ACID3? Is bullshit. It tests things like DOM2 and CSS3 that aren't even completed standards yet, so if you develop a website that uses these features, you fail.

Name: Anonymous 2010-05-14 9:53

>>46
implying testing before having a complete standard (which often takes on the order of 20 years) is redundant

Name: Anonymous 2010-05-14 13:15

>>47
back to the imageboards, please

Name: Anonymous 2010-05-14 13:50

>>14
back to /b/, please.

Name: Anonymous 2010-05-14 14:07

>>49
Back to 2006, please

Name: Anonymous 2010-05-14 15:14

>>50
back to time machine, please

Name: Anonymous 2010-05-14 15:20

>>51
2010'ians are really exclusivist. /prog/ in 2018 is way better socially(plus full facebook integration).

Name: Anonymous 2010-05-14 15:27

>>52
I look forward to bumping this thread with a reply to you in 2018.

Name: Anonymous 2010-05-14 15:31

>>53
I look forward to seeing your bump in 2018, realizing I'm still reading /prog/ and finally deciding to end it all.

NOW ONLY SGT. SAGETANK CAN SAVE MY LIFE!

Name: Anonymous 2010-05-14 15:40

>>54
FIGHT THE FUTURE

Name: Anonymous 2010-05-14 15:50

>>54
In my experience, all people have some social outlet where they vent. it could be a forum, bunch of chats or some newsgroup, but they stay there for years. Its like a mental home and its not "abnormal".

Name: Anonymous 2010-05-14 16:08

>>56
My real haunts are full of people I've known since before world4ch existed. Spending much time visiting /prog/ for 10 years running certainly is abnormal, though.

Name: Anonymous 2010-05-14 16:10

>>56
If by vent you

Name: Anonymous 2010-05-14 16:41

>>57
You mean like 20721?

Name: Anonymous 2010-05-14 17:22

>>59
I don't know what that means.

Name: Anonymous 2010-05-14 21:56

I only code websites for browsers that are open standards compliant.

And I don't block off anyone or redirect them to a browser download page, that's just being a dick.

Name: Anonymous 2010-05-14 22:03

>>61
When someone is walking around covered in in his own vomit, who is the greater dick: the person who helps him clean up, or the person who pretends there's nothing wrong with walking around covered in your own vomit?

Name: Anonymous 2010-05-14 22:07

>>62
You would NEVER clean the vomit off a stranger. Nobody would. You are a fucking crazy man.

Name: Anonymous 2010-05-14 22:30

>>63
Well, in this case it's more like directing him to a public restroom cum free laundromat. The analogy isn't necessarily perfect.

Name: Anonymous 2010-05-14 22:41

>>64
That's because you're wrong. Imperfect analogies are the only way you can be right.

Name: Anonymous 2010-05-15 0:19

>>65
Ironically, imperfect analogies lead to people missing the point.

Name: Anonymous 2010-05-15 0:40

>>64-65
Actually, the analogy is perfect as it is.

Name: Anonymous 2010-05-15 23:41

>>66
>>67
Ironically, you are actually the same person.

Name: Anonymous 2010-11-26 13:11

Name: Anonymous 2010-12-26 13:09

Name: Anonymous 2011-02-03 0:50

Name: Anonymous 2011-02-04 18:21

Name: Anonymous 2011-06-29 19:40

This is a test
of the emergency broadcast system!

Name: Anonymous 2011-06-29 19:41

Oh Fuck!
 WHAT DO???

Name: Anonymous 2011-06-29 19:42

Test
BB CODE IS LAME.

Name: Anonymous 2011-06-29 19:43

>Hello
>Faggot

Name: Anonymous 2011-06-29 19:43

>>76

No
U

Name: Anonymous 2011-06-29 19:46

alksjdflajsdflk
lajsdflajsdf;lja;dlskj

Name: Anonymous 2011-07-19 18:00

[quote]a
b
c[/quote]

Name: Anonymous 2011-07-19 18:01

[q]a
b
c[/q]
a
b
c

Name: Anonymous 2011-07-19 18:01

a
>b
>c

Name: Anonymous 2011-07-19 18:02

[blockquote]a
b
c[/blockquote]

Name: Anonymous 2012-03-28 2:18

my farts burn my anus
it hurts
in a good way

Name: Anonymous 2012-04-10 19:34

u
s
sub
sup

Name: Anonymous 2012-05-15 21:42

うｐぼあちんｇ

Name: Anonymous 2012-05-15 23:17

[quote]multi
line
wut[/quote]

[quot]another
lol
whee[/quot]

>wut
>is
>this

i
dont
know

Name: Anonymous 2012-05-15 23:18

"how
does
this
work"

Name: Anonymous 2012-05-15 23:20

[quote]what a piece of shit[/quote]

[quote]this
is
bull
shit[/quote]

Name: Anonymous 2012-05-15 23:27

NIGGERS AND JEWS
NIGGERS AND JEWS
NIGGERS AND JEWS
NIGGERS AND JEWS
NIGGERS AND JEWS
NIGGERS AND JEWS
NIGGERS AND JEWS
NIGGERS AND JEWS
NIGGERS AND JEWS
NIGGERS AND JEWS
NIGGERS AND JEWS
NIGGERS AND JEWS
NIGGERS AND JEWS
NIGGERS AND JEWS
NIGGERS AND JEWS
Don't change these.
Name: Email:
Entire Thread Thread List
All trademarks and copyrights on this site are owned by their respective parties. All comments and posts are the responsibility of their own posters.
- Tinychan + 2ch Mode -