Return Styles: Pseud0ch, Terminal, Valhalla, NES, Geocities, Blue Moon. Entire thread

Web Browser Compatability

Name: Anonymous 2006-03-15 17:02

When doing a website, do you think it's right to be code for only certain browser (ie the most used browsers like Firefox & IE (latest ver)) and to just say to other users of browsers like Safari, IE 5 , "sorry you cant use this site"

Name: Anonymous 2010-05-13 23:38

>>40
I know.  Since Thread Necromancy was already cast, I thought I'd bring up ACID3 rather than waste a new thread.

Name: Anonymous 2010-05-13 23:50

>>41
Okay... but you didn't state anything aside from common knowledge. I don't get it. Are you the guy that usually makes new threads stating the painfully obvious or something?

Name: Anonymous 2010-05-14 1:16

>>39
The first nightly build of Firefox that passed Acid2 happened twenty days after the post you're replying to. For official releases, it would take until June 2008, which I wouldn't call ``a long time ago''. Particularly since that was over three years after the release of Acid2.

Name: Anonymous 2010-05-14 1:21

>>42
I haven't made a new thread on /prog/ in months.  On the same hand, I don't initiate Thread Necromancy (or meme spam) either.
Just thought I'd bring up ACID3 and see if anyone really had something to contribute since an otherwise useless thread would waste space on the front page for a while anyway ...

Name: Anonymous 2010-05-14 2:24

>>44
Sure, but... oh forget it.

Name: Anonymous 2010-05-14 8:30

ACID3? Is bullshit. It tests things like DOM2 and CSS3 that aren't even completed standards yet, so if you develop a website that uses these features, you fail.

Name: Anonymous 2010-05-14 9:53

>>46
implying testing before having a complete standard (which often takes on the order of 20 years) is redundant

Name: Anonymous 2010-05-14 13:15

>>47
back to the imageboards, please

Name: Anonymous 2010-05-14 13:50

>>14
back to /b/, please.

Name: Anonymous 2010-05-14 14:07

>>49
Back to 2006, please

Name: Anonymous 2010-05-14 15:14

>>50
back to time machine, please

Name: Anonymous 2010-05-14 15:20

>>51
2010'ians are really exclusivist. /prog/ in 2018 is way better socially(plus full facebook integration).

Name: Anonymous 2010-05-14 15:27

>>52
I look forward to bumping this thread with a reply to you in 2018.

Name: Anonymous 2010-05-14 15:31

>>53
I look forward to seeing your bump in 2018, realizing I'm still reading /prog/ and finally deciding to end it all.

NOW ONLY SGT. SAGETANK CAN SAVE MY LIFE!

Name: Anonymous 2010-05-14 15:40

>>54
FIGHT THE FUTURE

Name: Anonymous 2010-05-14 15:50

>>54
In my experience, all people have some social outlet where they vent. it could be a forum, bunch of chats or some newsgroup, but they stay there for years. Its like a mental home and its not "abnormal".

Name: Anonymous 2010-05-14 16:08

>>56
My real haunts are full of people I've known since before world4ch existed. Spending much time visiting /prog/ for 10 years running certainly is abnormal, though.

Name: Anonymous 2010-05-14 16:10

>>56
If by vent you

Name: Anonymous 2010-05-14 16:41

>>57
You mean like 20721?

Name: Anonymous 2010-05-14 17:22

>>59
I don't know what that means.

Name: Anonymous 2010-05-14 21:56

I only code websites for browsers that are open standards compliant.

And I don't block off anyone or redirect them to a browser download page, that's just being a dick.

Name: Anonymous 2010-05-14 22:03

>>61
When someone is walking around covered in in his own vomit, who is the greater dick: the person who helps him clean up, or the person who pretends there's nothing wrong with walking around covered in your own vomit?

Name: Anonymous 2010-05-14 22:07

>>62
You would NEVER clean the vomit off a stranger. Nobody would. You are a fucking crazy man.

Name: Anonymous 2010-05-14 22:30

>>63
Well, in this case it's more like directing him to a public restroom cum free laundromat. The analogy isn't necessarily perfect.

Name: Anonymous 2010-05-14 22:41

>>64
That's because you're wrong. Imperfect analogies are the only way you can be right.

Name: Anonymous 2010-05-15 0:19

>>65
Ironically, imperfect analogies lead to people missing the point.

Name: Anonymous 2010-05-15 0:40

>>64-65
Actually, the analogy is perfect as it is.

Name: Anonymous 2010-05-15 23:41

>>66
>>67
Ironically, you are actually the same person.

Name: Anonymous 2010-11-26 13:11

Name: Anonymous 2010-12-26 13:09

Name: Anonymous 2011-02-03 0:50

Name: Anonymous 2011-02-04 18:21

Name: Anonymous 2011-06-29 19:40

This is a test
of the emergency broadcast system!

Name: Anonymous 2011-06-29 19:41

Oh Fuck!
 WHAT DO???

Name: Anonymous 2011-06-29 19:42

Test
BB CODE IS LAME.

Name: Anonymous 2011-06-29 19:43

>Hello
>Faggot

Name: Anonymous 2011-06-29 19:43

>>76

No
U

Name: Anonymous 2011-06-29 19:46

alksjdflajsdflk
lajsdflajsdf;lja;dlskj

Name: Anonymous 2011-07-19 18:00

[quote]a
b
c[/quote]

Name: Anonymous 2011-07-19 18:01

[q]a
b
c[/q]
a
b
c
Newer Posts
Don't change these.
Name: Email:
Entire Thread Thread List
All trademarks and copyrights on this site are owned by their respective parties. All comments and posts are the responsibility of their own posters.
- Tinychan + 2ch Mode -