Return Styles: Pseud0ch, Terminal, Valhalla, NES, Geocities, Blue Moon. Entire thread

Why don't we kill pedos?

Name: Anonymous 2012-12-29 18:47

Why don't we kill pedophiles and child molesters? I see these freaks bragging about being pedos or talking about kids they see in public all the time here on 4chan. Execute a few thousands of those sick shits and I fucking guarantee that shit will stop.

Name: Anonymous 2013-02-01 13:33

>>77
Julian Assange is the perfect example of how rumour and misinformation is effective at destroying a person's reputation. Because of spin a person who exposes war crimes with undeniable video footage becomes ZOMG an evil hacker who HATES AMERICA and because having sex without a condom is a crime in some places he's an evil sex offender, rapists who HATES AMERICA.

>>79
No, the issue is that he slept in the same beds as random children he took a liking too. Many things about his behaviour and actions were legitimately questionable.

Name: Anonymous 2013-02-01 23:49

[quote]Hacky-sack[/quote]

No, not hacky-sack.

Name: Anonymous 2013-02-02 15:32

>>81
http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/2012/aug/23/women-against-rape-julian-assange

There is no hysteria over Julian Assange. False accusations do happen and measures should be taken against them, however most sex offenders actually are sex offenders, there is no comparison between Julian Assange's case and the majority of sex offenders.

Name: Anonymous 2013-02-02 16:12

Name: Anonymous 2013-02-02 23:38

>>84
What a reputable source you've got there!

Name: Anonymous 2013-02-03 6:47

>>85
Well, yes, it is a reputable source when it shows where each and every exact quote comes from and can be traced to either a something written by the person giving the quote or a video of them. I'm glad you agree that my link is the definition of a reputable source.

Name: Anonymous 2013-02-03 7:14

>>84
Sorry, I didn't explain properly.

These people are political motivated, they want to punish him for wikileaks, not being a horndog in the bedroom.

The majority of the population do not believe Assange is a pervert in the same league as Jimmy Saville or Garry Glitter.

Name: Anonymous 2013-02-03 11:25

>>87
Whether or not they're in the same league is irrelevant, the point is that it sticks in the mind of those who oppose him. it's used as something to discredit him, something that is unproven and very obviously politically motivated.

Name: Anonymous 2013-02-03 12:36

>>87
These people are political motivated, they want to punish him for wikileaks
Precisely. Politicos tend to be good at rallying the weak-minded by whipping up occasional mass hysteria, FOR THE CHILDREN.
Not to mention, the resourceful ones usually outsource the hysteria-whippers, for plausible deniability – «We're not making any hysteria, we're taking people's concern seriously!»

And if some weird shit sticks on the unfortunate thought-criminal in question (like Assange), then that's just so much the better; people will never listen to him again.
Better still, it can be used on future troublemakers; «The last ones were discovered to be sex offenders, the lot. Seems to be a connection there. How'bout you, kid?»

Name: Anonymous 2013-02-03 16:29



#      .---.                                               _..._                    
#      |   |                                            .-'_..._''.                 
#      '---'                                   .--.   .' .'      '.\ .--.           
#      .---.                                   |__|  / .'            |__|           
#      |   |                              .|   .--. . '              .--.           
#      |   |                            .' |_  |  | | |              |  |     __    
#      |   |    _    _          _     .'     | |  | | |              |  |  .:--.'.  
#      |   |   | '  / |       .' |   '--.  .-' |  | . '              |  | / |   \ | 
#      |   |  .' | .' |      .   | /    |  |   |  |  \ '.          . |  | `" __ | | 
#      |   |  /  | /  |    .'.'| |//    |  |   |__|   '. `._____.-'/ |__|  .'.''| | 
#   __.'   ' |   `'.  |  .'.'.-'  /     |  '.'          `-.______ /       / /   | |_
#  |      '  '   .'|  '/ .'   \_.'      |   /                    `        \ \._,\ '/
#  |____.'    `-'  `--'                 `'-'                               `--'  `"

Name: Anonymous 2013-02-03 16:36

>>88
>>89
No they haven't, they've failed. Even hardcore feminists are siding with Julian Assange because they know that the authorities are abusing their cause.

http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/2012/aug/23/women-against-rape-julian-assange

The majority of sex offenders are actually sex offenders and not the victim of some conspiracy by "politicos". They aren't "like Assange".

Name: Anonymous 2013-02-04 20:26

This thread has dissappointingly gone from child sex offenders to regular sex offenders

Name: Anonymous 2013-02-05 6:48

>>92
That's business as usual for the jews, it was pointed out that all child sex offenders are jewish so they had to quickly divert attention from that fact.

Name: Anonymous 2013-02-05 9:18

>>91
One single failure != lack of trying.

Name: Anonymous 2013-02-05 9:24

>>93
Here we go again, jews jews everywhere, especially if there actually ain't none. Facepalm.jpg

FYI: The shorter it takes (fewer posts in a random thread) for some OCD Autist to fantasise Jewish connections willy-nilly, the more people will equate anti-semitism with retarded faggotry.
Which is precisely what the Jews want!

Have you collected your 30 pieces of silver yet?

Name: Anonymous 2013-02-05 17:17

>>8
Where would a pedo get help?

Name: Anonymous 2013-02-05 18:15

>>95
You make yourself too obvious, Mordechahai.

Name: Anonymous 2013-02-06 2:12

>>94
lack of trying
Even in a case as serious as Assange with all the resources they must have invested in the case all they can muster is to accuse him of rolling over and doing it again without permission, after consensual sex. Even in dictatorships they never accuse someone of rape, they say "he was selling nuclear secrets to evil capitalists" or something.

Why are you trying to claim 100% of accusations of sex crime are part of a massive conspiracy?

Name: Anonymous 2013-02-06 3:03

>>97
The pot calling the kettle black, much?

Name: Anonymous 2013-02-06 3:08

>>98
Why are you trying to claim 100% of accusations of sex crime are part of a massive conspiracy?
Why are you putting words in my mouth?
I'm saying it's a nifty tool for the "them" to (try to) silence dissidents &such, which is a whole different thing. Helped a whole lot by _actual_ rapes performed by _actual_ rapists.

Name: Anonymous 2013-02-06 22:31

>>96
just go to the police and turn yourself in, they will give you advice

Name: Anonymous 2013-02-06 22:41

>>100
No they prefer to find loopholes in the law that might actually stick rather than suddenly claim "oh, this guy, our political enemy, yeah he is some kind of huge monster".

Only sociopaths with little self-control try to pull that off and it usually doesn't work.

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2241628/The-deputy-head-teacher-falsely-accused-child-abuse-ambulance-chasing-lawyer-advertises-victims-prisons.html

Name: Anonymous 2013-02-07 17:24

>>101
Oh, right!
"Put yourself on this sex-offender list, so nobody will ever give you a job, every neighbor you'll ever have will hate your guts, your whole family will cut you off… before you even get the chance to prove you ain't actually done anything.
Basically your life will be over, just cause you did the crime of feeling something. Might as well shoot yourself right away, and save us the trouble. Make sure you get your whole head in front of the shotgun."

Riiiiiight!
Basically, we (the society) are telling pedos that they might as well go rape a loli or two straight away, then they'd at least deserve what they get; essentially, you're damned if you do, damned if you don't.

Name: Anonymous 2013-02-07 17:59

>>102
Only sociopaths with little self-control
Let's just say, not all psychos work at FoxNews…

The more clever ones will gather (or muddy, as appropriate) the evidence to make the case take long enough to tie up someone they don't like.
And that's when they can't just simply use (and twist) the truth against their opponent and make "crimes" out of non-crimes. Then find the right moment to spring the news.
But that's off-topic.


Back on topic, my point is this:
As long as kiddy-fiddlers (real or otherwise) are persecuted and which-hunted as part of the Moral Panic Of The Day, the $EvilConspiracy will see it as a nifty tool in the toolbox.

Actually, though, it's the honest mistakes (someone seriously thought you were kiddy-fiddling) that are more dangerous to the innocent; those will have the conviction that they're right about you. That requires less acting skill than the deliberate character assassination, which also has the distinct disadvantage that it can be found out to be that.

Name: Anonymous 2013-02-07 18:31

Muslims, Jews and Christians love molesting children in honor of their divine prophets. They said "bring to me the children". Are they truly wrong for obeying what their God told them to enjoy?
Matthew 19:14 , Banning 66:1
It's not like they stole some pennies [I'm looking at you "gub-mint"].

http://www.theonion.com/articles/white-house-jester-beheaded-for-making-fun-of-soar,17495/

Name: Anonymous 2013-02-07 23:09

>>104
Obviously we shouldn't drop standards of proof, but I think you have a deluded view of the situation. We mustn't give actual pedophiles excuses like "hurr there is a huge conspiracy against me" or "she is only convinced it happened because of moral panic hysteria", we also need to encourage people to snitch on pedophiles.

http://tips.fbi.gov
http://iwf.org.uk

Name: Anonymous 2013-02-07 23:47

>>106
Just as long as people keep in mind the fact that there's a difference between pedophiles and child-abusers. It's key to keeping things pointing in the right direction.

Thankfully, we seem to be approaching a (somewhat) sane balance there. At least until the next time some MAFIAA decides we need more censorship &shit, FOR THE CHILDREN.

Name: Anonymous 2013-02-08 0:07

>>103
>>104
You guys shouldn't waste your time here with this kike. He's trolling you to get a profile on you. You are put on a list labeled 'dangerous' by them just for making it known that you have the capability to cause problems in their operations by exposing the inherent logical and moral atrocities that they float on but are forced and dulled into acceptance through repetition.
>>106
So why havent you reported Israel, MIT, and all of Hollywood to those sites if you're so concerned about pedophilia?
Right, because you're only concerned about non-jewish pedophilia, but really not even that. You're just concerned with using pedo-hysteria as a tool to use against target non-jews.
Take for example your famous jewish television show, when have they ever entrapmented a jew onto it? I mean ever. Funny that eh? Almost as if they only go after non-jews or something. Can you guess what the head of NBC's ethnicity is? What about its parent corporation GE? No, but surely the holy jews could never be propegating such a racist affront to subvert gentilekind, the jew is infallible! It must be because there are no jewish pedophiles! Of course, the jew would never do such a thing!

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=q6TmsNGPPHU
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=q6TmsNGPPHU
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=q6TmsNGPPHU

Name: Anonymous 2013-02-08 16:02

>>92
Well opposition to both can at times be quite hysterical, so that's why the connection is appropriate.

Name: Anonymous 2013-02-08 16:22

>>108
Take for example your famous jewish television show, when have they ever entrapmented a jew onto it?
Uh, you obviously haven't watched To Catch a Predator enough to realize that they already did. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xt6MmzRRYk0

Name: Anonymous 2013-02-08 18:52

>>47
>>52
What happened to you anon? You were the only helpful one here...

Name: Anonymous 2013-02-09 2:44

>>111
What else is there to say?

Name: Anonymous 2013-02-09 3:06

>>110
One whole jew, in the earliest days when it was hardly watched, surprised they even let him on the show, guess that rabbi pissed off the wrong jew somewhere up the jew pyramid to get thrown under the bus like that. Hilarious he only got 6 years, you know what he would've gotten if he was a non-jew?

Name: Anonymous 2013-02-09 6:02

this is so going to change
eventually you will be locked up for denying children to sexual access of adults and adults who are pedo, will be considered enlightened

....its sick but it s going to happen the same way as homo men are glorified, but should not be

Name: Anonymous 2013-02-09 8:51

>>113
You sure do love moving those goalposts. Perhaps a much more simpler explanation is that he fucked up all on his own? Yeah, but that idea doesn't thrill you, right?

Name: Anonymous 2013-02-09 9:08

>>108
If you have any specific cases about individuals in Israel, MIT or Hollywood who have committed sex crimes go right ahead and report them.

Name: Anonymous 2013-02-09 21:03

>>96
An electric chair would serve them nicely.

Name: Anonymous 2013-02-11 22:54

Why don't we kill niggers?

Name: sage 2013-02-13 3:04

>>118
Right there. You just go ahead to Compton with a Glock and holler "Any niggers here I can kill?"
I'll be a hundred yards behind you, with a video camera.

Name: Anonymous 2013-02-14 5:17

>>119
i do this every day after breakfast

Newer Posts
Don't change these.
Name: Email:
Entire Thread Thread List