Now Apply this Logic Elsewhere

A majority of criminals measured by total crimes of all categories are heterosexual men. Therefore, ALL heterosexuals are inherently criminal, even children. If you disagree it's because you've been brainwashed by heterosexual dominated media. The majority of people in government are by far heterosexual because of a conspiracy! Heterosexuals own the Federal Reserve! They own the military! They own the banks!

My logic is infallible.

>>39
In fact every Jew commits crime, so all the Jews are criminals. Ask yourself, why the Jews live in YOUR country, while all normal nations live inside their own countries.

>>41
Every nation has its criminals. And all the criminals together form Jewish nation. The Jews are the nation of incorrigible criminals, awaiting execution.

>>38
Only you you're not using at as a straw man but as an actual serious argument every single time you open your mouth. Your entire premise is that correlation=causation and OP masterfully exposes this critical fault in your logic. If you want to accept that correlation=causation then you can't possibly deny that heterosexuals are ruining the world.

Check-fucking-mate.

>>39
Only you are pushing the idea that it's mere correlation, because you're a shill from JIDF. Get, the, fuck, out.

>>43
Same fucking jew. Keep trying to spin the truth in a fabric of lies and deceit, since that's all you kikes are capable of, filthy vermin.

>>44
Okay fine, call me a Jew. What the fuck do I care? Will you stop insisting that correlation = causation from now on?

>>45
You're the one one on this entire board who ever has even suggested such a thing. How can I stop something I've never done? Typical kike, sure would be nice if they didn't have the money to pay you to shill up this board.

>>46

Okay guys, I'm actually going to walk this Russian through it.

You read the newspaper and see some Jewish guy arrested for doing something illegal.  You see this a bunch of times.

You decide, based on the number of times you see it, that there is a clue as to why there are so many arrests.  All the crimes are committed by these Jews, so maybe their "Jewishness" correlates with their illegal behavior.  They must be committing crimes because they are Jews.

Moreover, if it is "Jewishness" which is causing these crimes (as established in previous paragraph), then it logically follows that ALL Jews must have the same penchant for illegal activity.  Thus, all Jews (even those who have yet to actually do anything wrong) are evil, dastardly scumbags etc.

This is called a "correlation = causation" argument.  You see a "correlation" (Jews and crime), and expect that to be sufficient proof to make a categorical judgement from the situation (It is their Jewishness which drives their crimes).  So even if you never used those words yourself, you are, in fact, making such an argument.

The OP was parodying your thought process, by posing the exact same correlation = causation argument, but substituting "Jew" for "heterosexual". 

He argues: It appears to be that most crimes are committed by >heterosexuals<.  Thus, if most of the crimes are committed by these heterosexuals, their "heterosexuality" correlates with their illegal behavior.  If so many heterosexuals are committing crimes, it must be BECAUSE they are heterosexuals.  A correlation (heterosexuals and crime) can mean a causation (It is their heterosexuality which drives their crimes)

The OP knew his argument was absurd and ridiculous.  But the reasoning for his argument, "since lots of them do it, it must be something about them" is actually the same as your own.  That is what he was attempting to show you.

>>47
You read the newspaper and see some Jewish guy arrested for doing something illegal.  You see this a bunch of times.
Actually, the Jews rarely get arrested for what they do (just like Lenin wasnt arrested for killing millions of Slavs and backstabbing Russia in WW1), so I rarely see this.

>>47
The OP was parodying your thought process
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/False_analogy

>>48
So you don't even have any evidence for what you believe?

>>50
Yay! Lenin is innocent! Trotsky was a great russian patriot.

>>47
Simply put, nothing you have ever said reflects anything about the truth of reality. You posit a strawman and try to paint it as parody but it actually has absolutely no basis in fact, (both of reality and my personal knowledge) which is typical snake oil salesman spinstrelness. It may work on your obedient sheep drone goys who don't have the gonads to think outside of what you spoonfeed them, but it will never work on us, we are here BECAUSE we are not apart of the pack of cattle that you lead to oblivion. You're wasting your time even trying to convince us, and your employers are wasting their money paying you to do it, hymie.

>>52
Unfortunately, that is how a shortsighted person can think.  In a classroom debate, I once convinced a classmate of something entirely ridiculous by accident because he was following a correlation=causation train of thought and I was being more sarcastic than I should have been for too long a stretch.  The proctor eventually called me out on the sarcasm when it got heavy but it still convinced the other guy.  (To add insult to injury, what I convinced him about had nothing to do with the actual debate topic so sorting it out was actually a waste of class time.)

Neither here nor there.

Point of the matter is that there are [herd animal motif] on either side of any argument, when you really want critical thinkers.  Also, to foster the said [herd animal motif] into critical thinking material, lest one day that person finds himself on the wrong side of a podium and unduly disgraces his position.

_{Also, I do wish I got paid to post on /newpol/.  Just saying.}

>>52
The hypocrisy is killing me. You couldn't possibly be more disconnected from reality. Your entire post boggles the mind. If I was standing up when I read it I would have needed to sit down for a while afterwards.

Even after it being explained to you you still don't have even the smallest understanding of the depth of flaw in your logic. You believe that Lenin was a Jew and that everything he ever done was because he was a Jew therefore all Jews are evil. If you don't understand how the logic of this is clearly broken having read the OP of this thread then as you say I'm wasting my time on you.

>>54
Your hypocrisy should be killing you, jew. By fuck I swear if it could we'd have progress.
These are fact:
1) Lenin was a jew
2) Everything he ever did WAS because he was a jew
3) All jews ARE evil
But you keep trying to insinuate that anyone just looks narrowly at Lenin and follows your retarded strawman claim of how it works. It's far more than just Lenin, it is literally every jew ever, and every actual problem the species faces due to failing to exterminate the parasites completely and finally.
Worse than cockroaches they are. Especially you, you have to be the densest of anyone for thinking anyone will believe that your strawman topic has any relation to our cause and why we fight for it.
I know you'll never stop trying though, after all it's all for money, which is all that's important to you, hymie.

>>55
It's not a straw man if you fucking agree with it, in the same post no less. You literally took my statement, called it fact and then claimed it was a strawman. Doublethink at its finest.

>>55
Everything he ever did WAS because he was a jew
Lenin was
1. Jewish
2. Had mostly the Jewish friends
3. Disliked Russia and the Slavs
4. Spoke Russian with a heavy Yiddish accent (see http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=capVnww7aMU)
5. Was very philosemitic.

"В первые дни революции в канал революции бросилась интеллигентская и полуинтеллигентская городская еврейская масса. Она, естественно, устремилась в революционное строительство, а с этим связано и управление… В тот момент, когда значительная часть русской интеллигенции отхлынула, испугалась революции, как раз в этот момент еврейская интеллигенция хлынула в канал революции, заполнила его большим процентом по сравнению со своей численностью и начала работать в революционных органах управления." -- Mikhail Kalinin

>>57
Nineteen-year Jewish girl with a frankness explained why the Cheka is completely in the hands of the Jews. "These Russians - Slavs are spineless mollusks, with Slavic carelessness there will be nothing left of the communism and the communists. That's why we allow Russians on all sorts of roles, except the leading ones. -- G. N. Michalkovsky, Diary. From the history of the Russian Foreign Ministry, 1914-1920

>>58
Are you the finitist ``in Lisp'' guy who love bishop Berkeley?

>>59
Yes.

>>60
I find that post on /prog/ confusing:
http://dis.4chan.org/read/prog/1308587549/28

Muslim, living in Chechnya and now... of slavic descent? How so?

>>61
But I'm not Chechen. Besides...
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Teip
More than 20 teips originated from newcomers, in particular Avars, Kumyks, Jews, Georgians, Russians, Turks.

A good half of Chechens have European outlook. That is because Chechens live on an important junction point, where Asia, Middle-East and Europe meet together.

>>62
Is there a lot of (slavic) russian Muslims? I thought Tatars were muslims and Slavs were orthodox christians. Is their conversion recent? I came accross this article and was quite surprised: http://www.eurasiareview.com/04042011-ukraine-have-more-than-million-slavs-become-muslims-since-1991-analysis/

>>63
Both Ukraine and Russia have large Tatar population, who have a lightweight form of Islam, compared to Middle Eastern countries.

Many Slavs are atheistic, some, like me, even hate Christianity and Communism alike.

░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░██░░██░░░░
░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░██░░██░░██░░
░░░░░░░░░░░░░░██░░░░░██░░░░
░░░░░░░░░░░░░██░░░░░░░░░░░░
░████░░█████████████░░████░
█░░░███░░░░░░░░░░░░░███░░░█
░███░░░░███░░░░░███░░░░███░
░█░░░░░░███░░░░░███░░░░░░█░
░█░░░░██░░░░░░░░░░░██░░░░█░
░░██░░░░███████████░░░░██░░
░░░░███░░░░░░░░░░░░░███░░░░
░░░░░░░█████████████░░░░░░░
░░░░░░██░░░░░░░░░░░██░░░░░░
░░░░░█░█░░░░░░░░░░░█░█░░░░░
░░░░█░░█░░░░░░░░░░░█░░█░░░░
░░░░█░░█░░░░░░░░░░░█░░█░░░░
░░░░█░░█░░░░░░░░░░░█░░█░░░░
░░░░░█░█░░░░░░░░░░░█░█░░░░░
░░░░░███░░░░░░░░░░░██░░░░░░
░░░░░░██░░░░░░░░░░░██░░░░░░
░░░██████░░░░░░░░░██████░░░
░░█░░░░░░█░░░░░░░█░░░░░░█░░
░█████████████████████████░
There should be a camp for Hetrosexuals where they can concentrate on death. Work will make them free.
At least that's the lie we will tell them even though they are clearly old and will die due to substandard conditions of the camp.

So I talked to a New York Resident that is 82 years old who is staying in LA. He's a big fan of Charlie Rose. He told me that cigarettes used to cost 11 cents and gold was at a fixed price at 35 dollars per ounce. Then "Insert stereotypical anti-ethnic group here" interrupted the groove and the American dollar was forced to be floated to compete with another country when it came to floating prices. Then he gave a anecdotal story about how worthless Moroccan currency is.

At the end of the story, he recommended that I get a degree in math and become a investment banker.
I was so creeped out by this horrifying suggestion , that I ran out of that retail establishment food-court that I was squatting in for free wi-fi for. I'm never going back there ever again.

>>66
Cigarettes are just a waste of farming space, money and health. The more they cost - the better.

>>67
So are spices, beef, sugar, chocolate, cotton and 100s of luxuries that we are slaves to. People are so selfish, they should just live on rations of lentils with necessary vitamins and minerals produced by GM micro-organisms so that the elite can have more resources at their disposal instead of it going to the middle class so they can enjoy their lives. Oh, wait, I don't mean that, I mean, to stop global warming and save the rainforest and all that.

>>68
Chocolate? Luxuries? Are you a woman? Back to kitchen, please.

>>69
Chocolate? Luxuries? Are you a woman?
If you'd known the first thing about women, then you'd realise how ridiculous that question is.

>>69
Are you a woman?
No?

A girl on the internet? Can I white knight you in hopes that you hint that we'll have sex but we never do because you prefer wealthy brown men named "Biff" who appear to be more savage by comparison ?
This is totally not socially awkward because I am hinting that I want to molest you but I'm too afraid to.
██████████████████████████████
██████████████████▓░▒▒▒▓██████
███████████████▓▓▓▒░▒▒▒▒▓▓████
███▓░░▒▒▒▒▒░░░░░▒▒▒▒░░▒▒░▒████
███░░░▒▒░░░░░░░░▓▓▒▒░▒▒▒░▒████
███▓▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▓▓▓██████
████░░░▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▓▓▓▓▓▒▓█████████
████░░░▒▒▒░▒▒▒▓▓▓▓█▒▓▓▓▓██████
███████████▒▒▒▒▒▓█▓▒▓▓▓███████
████████████▒▒▓▓▓▓▒▓▓▓▓███████
████████████▒░▒▒▒▒▓▓▓▒▓███████
██████████▒░░░▒▒▒▓█▓▒▒▓███████
████████▒░░░░▒▓▓▓██▓▒▒▓███████
██████▒░░░░▒▓▓▓▒▓█▓▓▒▒████████
█▓██▓░░░░░▒▓▓▒▒▒▓█▓▒▒▒████████
████░░░░░▒▓▓▓░░▓█▓▓▒░▒████████
███▓░░░▒▒▓▓▓▒░▒▓█▓▒░░▒████▓███
███▓░░░▒▓▓▓▓░░▒▓▓▓▒░░▒████▓█▓▓
███▓░░░▒▓▒▓▒░░▒▓▓▓░░▒▓███▓████
████░░░▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▓▓▒▒▒▒▓████████
████▒░▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▓▒▓▒▓▓▓▓████████
█████▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▓▓▓███████
█▓████░▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▓▓▓▓█████▓████
▓▓██▓▒░▒▒▒▒▓▓▓▓▓▓▓████████████
██▓▒░░░░▒▒▒▒▒▒▓▓▓▓▓███████████
█░░░░▒░░░░░░▒▒▒▒▓▓▓▓▓█████████
░░▒░▒▒▒░░░░░▒▒▒▒▒▒▓▓▓▓▓▓▓█████
▒░░░▒▒▒▒░▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▓▓▓▓▓▓▓███
░░▒░░░░░░░▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▓▓▓█████
▒░░░▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▓▓▓▓▓▓███████
██▓░░░░░▒▒▒▒▒▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓██████
█████▓▓▓▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▓▓▓▓▓████████
▓▒▓▓▓▓███████▓█████████████▓▓█

Quick, derail the thread! The pressure of its logic is becoming too much to handle!

Classic heterosexual tactics.

The word "NASI" is a title that defines JUDEN
ROYALTY. It's found 132 times in their ancient writings.
The Jews also cooked their concentrated victims. 2 Kings
1:10.
Was he damned for his sacrifice, or was he damned for his
obedience?

Omega Code.

>>73
We get it, you're being sarcastic and proving that generalization is wrong by proof through example.

However this is a bad example since you failed at mathematics. If there are 1000 heterosexuals and 1% are criminals, 100 homosexuals and 2% are criminals, this would mean there are 10 heterosexual criminals and 2 homosexual criminals.

A better example would be men versus women, since as we all know men are statistically more likely to commit crime.

However while this may mean discrimination is not justified because the vast majority of men are not criminals, it does not mean that we should ignore statistics.

Just as we should look into the reasons why men are more likely to commit crime we should look into the reasons why crime rates differ among the races. These races were seperated for 1000s of years with little mixing between them and developed different cultures as well as genes, if we do not tackle this fact then all we are doing is leaving it to the racists to abuse.

We need to face reality without political bias or fear of what the bigots and fascists might do.

Isn't it funny how the cowardly kike hides behind niggers or homosexuals. He is all like "dont touch poor Hymie, here are some homosexuals for you instead"

>>76
But who hides behind the KIKE? Why it's the NAZI.

But why, who hides behind the NAZI? Oh, it's the KIKE.

But then who is the cowardly KIKE? So he's a NAZI.

Ad infinitum. You're the nazikikebastardhomosexualclosetmeanie now.