Clearing selling guns to every lunatic who wants them is safe, I mean, who doesn't bring their full-automatic rifle to the cinema? To do anything less would be "unpatriotic".
Name:
Anonymous2012-09-03 1:17
>>39
Okay, that's wonderful. Could you maybe go explore it over there? Like, away from here? Somewhere were people give a shit about your nonsense because that ain't here.
Name:
Anonymous2012-09-03 9:04
>>39
Thank you for steering clear of the point by several metric miles.
Now please grow a pair of brain cells. That alone should triple your IQ.
Name:
362012-09-03 11:16
>>37,39
I was going to go with "It's not polite to derail threads in the first place."
Clearly the problem is that we don't give our children rifles. If children had guns, they would be able to defend themselves. Everyone is safe when everyone is armed.
I am tired of hearing people compare guns to cars. The emotionally unstable and morally bankrupt are ALWAYS going to prefer guns over any other 'thing' that can be misused as a weapon against the innocent.
Obama doesn't give a fuck about how many guns you own.
Use them only against America's enemies.
Don't start shit that you can't endure.
Fucking terrorists everywhere.
Name:
Anonymous2012-12-19 3:55
>>53
They are also going to avoid people with guns.
Name:
Anonymous2012-12-19 14:28
>>54
If people who own guns avoid people who own guns, then how do criminal organizations like the NRA still manage to congregate?
Name:
Anonymous2012-12-19 16:01
>>55 The emotionally unstable and morally bankrupt are ALWAYS going to prefer guns They are also going to avoid people with guns. If people who own guns avoid people who own guns
By "they" I meant "the emotionally unstable and morally bankrupt", not all people who own guns are emotionally unstable and morally bankrupt, those people will gladly congregate with one another.
Name:
Anonymous2012-12-24 21:04
Someone should tell these crazy people to stop misusing guns, they are embarrassing the NRA.
Name:
Anonymous2012-12-25 3:16
I like how banning assault weapons is being seen as the "brave" thing to do, as if it's not just reinstating an expired ban and as if people who go on shooting sprees won't just use handguns, rifles or shotguns in the future.
Name:
Anonymous2012-12-25 3:17
I like how banning assault weapons is being seen as the "brave" thing to do, as if it's not just reinstating an expired ban and as if people who go on shooting sprees won't just use handguns, rifles or shotguns in the future.
Name:
Anonymous2012-12-25 3:44
>>59
The frequency of mass shootings involving assault weapons will be less.
Name:
Anonymous2012-12-25 10:29
>>60
The frequency of mass shootings preempted by assault weapons will be less.
Name:
Anonymous2012-12-25 14:49
>>61
How many mass shootings have been pre-empted at all, by any weapons? People do not bring assault weapons to college, kindergarten, cinema theatres or shopping malls.
Name:
Anonymous2012-12-25 17:58
And now we add fire scenes to the list. Should we arm fire fighters with assault weapons too? Maybe we can send in armed teams to clear buildings "just in case" before the fire is put out.
Name:
Anonymous2012-12-25 19:46
>>63
The civil rights movement would have been very different if those with the water hoses were armed with automatic weapons too.
Name:
Anonymous2012-12-26 2:17
>>62
That is a possible contributing factor as to why mass shootings occur in these places. If it occurs in a bank or sensitive areas covered by corporate security the shooter is usually dead before he has even killed anyone.
>>65 If it occurs in a bank or sensitive areas covered by corporate security the shooter is usually dead before he has even killed anyone.
Because in that type of situation, those armed people are trained beyond what most people do to obtain a permit, or in very gun-friendly states, they don't even have to pass a background check.