Anders Breivik is Jewish

You that that in mainstream, but anyone who has studied Jewish facial features will notice Anders Behring Breivik's fat shadow casting lower lip and thin upper lip, his fused earlobes, his nose bridge. The name Behring is Jewish. 796500 BEHRING http://www.avotaynu.com/csi/csi-home.htm

Jews also alter or change their name to gain acceptance. Here just an i was added. 797500 BREVIK C http://www.avotaynu.com/csi/csi-home.htm

These snakes have shape shifted by mixing their dominant seed with the natives of the country they infest and are now tormenting us while appearing like our own. Crypto-Jew is a term often used.

>>1
You won't hear that in mainstream
self fix

So does someone want to explain to me why everyone thinks Jews are so evil?

>>3
Israel, Zionists, Israel Lobby, Republicans, Bankers / Lawyers / what have you equating to lots of money to hold stock in corporations allowing them to force these corporations to do thing that they alone are solely held "responsible" for anything it does, and not these people who made it's decisions as collective owners. All of national media in america is owned by 5 corporations, no matter where an american turns they are being exposed to influence from these people and their agendas, the people of america digest this influence largely unknowingly, using the narrative of the holocaust as an industry to pre-cull criticism and dissent of the occupation of Palestine, and the targeted oppression and elimination of all muslims since they are people who will not bend to their influence, but not only that but they have lots of oil, allowing other non Israel worshipping societies (china, non christian african states, all of the middle east except Israel, and south america) to continue to operate free of being persecuted for not being their loyal pawns.

If the specifics are too much for you to take in, I'll make it basic for you: Any group that puts itself above criticism, evaluation, judgement, and ACTUAL law is invariably going to be seen as evil, and rightfully so.

Howabout you explain to me why you have to even ask such a question?

>>4
I'm sure there's some sense in this incoherent mess of a post, but I've yet to find any.

>>5
So in short, you're too dumb to understand the answer to your question. Thank you for at least providing an answer to mine I guess.

>>6
That would be true if I was the person you were talking to, but you're too dumb to recognize subtlety.

>>7
The problem is that you in fact ARE the person I'm talking to. You're too dumb to understand imperatives.

>>8
Personally, I think much more sense can be had if that mass of words used more sentence breaks.  That's generally the case.

>>8
Yeah, but I wasn't >>3 in this thread, so your whole argument is rendered moot. You're still too dumb to realize this, though.

>>9
Wouldn't make it any less cranky. You can try to polish a turd, but in the end it's still a turd.

>>9
That isn't even a mass. You just can't read anything over a line long.

>>10
Actually you were >>3 and my facts remain more relevant than anything you have yet to say or ever will, and you're still too dumb to realize that.

>>11
Oh, I see your game now.  You intended me to read it as if it were a narrative written in stream of consciousness style, right?

Why, when all people adored Sun, the Jews started to worship some abstract evil Cthulhu, they call "God", which promised them gold, land and slaves?

>>13
Technically, solar worship was tied very much to solar deities or deities who, over the years, were associated, not always thanks to interpretation of their original stories, with "sun-like" qualities.  It was never about "worshiping the sun;" the sun was seen as a source of power, even before we knew how many megatons explode on/in it daily.  Appeasement of the sun and attainment of these sun-like qualities was little more than human self-importance by deification; there was never really a "solar worship," just worship that used sun imagery for its own selfish means or explanations; perhaps awe and wonder but still, in the end, exploitation.

>>14
the sun was seen as a source of power, even before we knew how many megatons explode on/in it daily. 
Without the Sun nothing will grow on Earth, and plants wont grow without contact with Earth, so it was an obvious choice to make gods from Sun and Earth.

But Jews made God out of nothing - a pure confidence trick.

>>12
No, I intend for you to continue pathetically strawmanning to try and divert attention from the facts. Meanwhile, the facts remain, and you remain retarded.

>>15
And it worked.  Incredibly well, to be bluntly honest, leaving all the rest blurbs in history and, if lucky, pop. culture.

>>17
How lying about "existence of God" is in any way "honest"? Pagan priests at least predicted star movements - i.e. they were proto-scientists and got their respect through natural inquiry.

If God had listened to the Jew, then all goys would be extinct for a long time already. -- Russian saying

Can you believe, God makes you breathe? Why did he lose six million Jews? -- Emerson, Lake, Palmer

>>18
That's abuse of grammar.  The "blunt honest(y)" wasn't directed at Jewish individuals; it was directed at how prolific the general religious maneuver, away from "Earth and Sun" gods as it had been worded previously in this thread, and regardless of what words you use to described it, has been historically-speaking.  Abrahamic faiths taken together compose a large portion of prevalent religious belief worldwide.

Continuing your argument, however, I don't think you would care about any scientific or engineering contributions to society that I could list if the origin was a Jewish person.

>>20
it was directed at how prolific the general religious maneuver, away from "Earth and Sun"
Fail to see any benefits, except the dark ages and a myrriad of slave nations, like Russia, which is now left with dis.4chan.org/read/newpol/1332277659/1-40

Abrahamic faiths taken together compose a large portion of prevalent religious belief worldwide.
That should be regarded as evil colonization force. It destroyed individualities and cultural independence of these nations, helping the Jews to gain their today power and influence.

>>21
Whose text indicates what I said.  It isn't about reasons or even giving some credit where credit is due; you're just absorbed by your distaste of anything Mosaic (as in, ancestry from Moses) to care about anything else and blame them for everything.  It isn't any different than another other race blaming the "white man" for ruining continents other than Europe: sure, you can make that point, but you have to exaggerate in most all parts of the argument, and blame even the people who honestly don't know what's going on.

I had said what I had wanted to in >>17 and clarified my point in >>19.

>>22

you're just absorbed by your distaste of anything Mosaic (as in, ancestry from Moses)
Why should I, as Russian, accept Jewish occupation, which done so much evil to my nation?

It isn't any different than another other race blaming the "white man" for ruining continents other than Europe:
I clearly see that Africans and Latinos have all the rights to kill a few millions of yours, just for all what you done to them with your evil colonialism. Same for Arabs, who have rights over lives of whole population of Israel, hope they will soon get power to support their moral rights. Japan must avenge their dead in WWII with a retaliatory nuclear strike - that is a question of honor: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eye_for_an_eye

Remember, fellow Arabs, the Jews destroyed your http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Zoroastrianism and now your culture is completely consumed by colonial western influence.

>>23
>http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eye_for_an_eye
Using wikipedia link makes our statements more legit, right?

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eye_for_an_eye#cite_ref-19

>>24
Using wikipedia link makes our statements more legit, right?
Yes. Wiki says even your filthy Torah agrees, we should take your eyes out.

>>25
So you agree that an eye for an eye makes everyone blind and it's an all round retarded attitude to take. Wikipedia says it after all.

>>26
Jews aren't "everyone". And they will run out of eyes first.

>>27
No but Jews make up what part of what is considered as "everyone", you know, along with "everyone else".

>>27
>>28
I swear this argument is just a few transitions away from set theory.

>>22
But you didn't have a point, ever.

>>28
along with "everyone else".
Everyone else, excluding vermins.

>>29
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Set_theory
Mathematical topics typically emerge and evolve through interactions among many researchers. Set theory, however, was founded by a single paper in 1874 by Georg Cantor

Georg Cantor was born in 1845 in St. Petersburg, Russia, where his father was a merchant. The father, Georg Waldemar Cantor, had Jewish parents. -- Loren Graham, Naming Infinity, p. 25

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/George_Cantor#Cantor.27s_ancestry
Cantor was frequently described as Jewish in his lifetime. In 1874, Cantor married Vally Guttmann. As a Jewish (Ashkenazic) surname, Guttmann comes from the male given name Gutman.
http://www.ancestry.com.au/facts/Kantor-family-history-sct.ashx
Cantor is jewish (Ashkenazic) occupational name for a cantor, an official of a synagogue whose duty is to sing liturgical music and leads prayers

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Abraham_Fraenkel
Fraenkel was a fervent Zionist and as such was a member of Jewish National Council and the Jewish Assembly of Representatives He is known for his contributions to axiomatic set theory, especially his addition to Ernst Zermelo's axioms which resulted in Zermelo–Fraenkel axioms.

http://mathforum.org/kb/message.jspa?messageID=69757&tstart=0
In 1935 Zermelo resigned from this position. There is no doubt that it
was caused by the firing and mistreatment of Jewish mathematicianss, e.g.
that of the algebraist and statistician Alfred Loewy who was removed from
his chair at Freiburg.


http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Aleph_number
>In set theory, Hebrew letter aleph (א)
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Beth_number
>In mathematics, Hebrew letter ב (beth)

>>31
Virtually the same set theory dribble I've seen on /prog/ since forever
Okay people, you can go about your business without alarm again.  I have successfully transitioned this conversation into anti-semitic set theory topics and no one was maimed this time.

>>32
Good job. Here's a cookie! It is made of cat shit and graham crackers.

>>32
Blame Jews and set theoryStill hold no degree in computer science????PROFIT!