Anonymous FAIL

US probes hacker threat over WikiLeaks soldier

http://www.google.com/hostednews/afp/article/ALeqM5gt8mSjhQ8IOKf7PNWsQavmpZLC2A?docId=CNG.08dc880232fd4c049d2f1a10f4641409.a71

Do you idiots realize that it's not a joke to attack the US military? It's not just "for teh lulz." You will end up getting v&.

Why do you support a treasonous little faggot anyway?

fuck off

>>2

Butthurt libfag detected.

>>1
>Why do you support a treasonous little faggot anyway?<

a) Because we're not americans.
b) Because he's telling us what our governments should
c) Just to see the look on Hilary's face
d) Because they are the only source of information on diplomatic relations.
e) He's more believeble than any politician.


Bonus question: Why do you support your treasonous governments?

>>4
support your treasonous governments
Because some good will come of it. For instance signing a deal with Kim Jong Il to build factories on the border and use North Korean labor. Kim Jong and his cronies will get all the money, the workers will get exploited, but if we didn't build the factory the workers would be valued less by the regime and treated like shit, the workers will also be educated and the bureaucrat in charge of the factories will exert some political pressure on Kim Jong to open the country up more. In the same way by supporting our military in trying to restore security to Afghanistan and Iraq we are doing good, the alternative is just more suffering. We can always punish those responsible after security has been restored.

>>1

>Why do you support a treasonous little faggot anyway?<

Many of our founding fathers were traitors who fucked over their friends in the British military by supporting a revolution. Guess it depends on your perspective.

Where ARE all these people? I haven't seen anything about this except in the news.

>>7
who?

Bonus question:
Why did the US military let a known mentally unstable soldier with delusions of grandeur to have access to files that he wasn't qualified to access?
If anything, had the Americans monitored their security better, then ASSrange would have stayed in townsville and tracked down kiddy fiddlers for the police.

>>9
Not taking you seriously, just reminding you to FUCK OFF

>>9
Bradley Manning has more integrity in his little finger than you have in your whole body.

>>11
At least I have the integrity not to stick my nose where it doesn't belong. The only reason it was America that got it's secrets leaked was because they didn't bother to tighter their security, not because it has dirty secrets.

Vet here
PFC Manning should be up for a Bronze Star or a Soldier's Medal.

>>13

Thank you for your service, sir. Perhaps future generations will officially recognize Manning.

>>12
Pentagon called. They said that when you're done spreading propaganda on this board, they want you to torture prisoners at Gauntanamo.

You guys haven't figured it out yet, have you?

>>16
Oh do elaborate.

OP, you were doing fine up until the "traitorous faggot" part. Now you're just getting pro-wikileaks hacktivists throwing abuse at you.

You're right. Attacking the US military is not a smart thing, but the anons are only doing it because they don't have to face a soldier face-to-face to do it online without any real consequences. And considering a apparent high ranking member of anonymous (anonymous isn't meant to have names; that's why it's anonymous) claiming that individuals with no direct involvement in the military once again exposes their pathetic mindsets.

To be honest, Anonymous can fuck off and stop whining about trivial shit that'll still happen years after their real life deaths

>>18
no u

>>19
Why? Just because you think you're fighting the good fight by doing on temp DDOS script kiddy shit in the name if some moral crusade doesn't mean you can tell me to fuck off, especially if by supporting anonymous you're associating with some yahoos who think attacking people who are only even remotely connected to anyone involved in the military or Quantico and treating them as fair game.

Just put your keyboard down for five minutes and get some fresh air. Sounds like you need it. Oh, and some spelling lessons, too.

u mad?

>>20

tsk

>>21
See what I mean. Pretty much confirms you're a bunch of underage children who are in it for the lulz. I don't need to say anything further.

>>23
To build on that, you're probably just a bunch of kids who thinks shooting a tank with a bullet is going to stop it. I bet you though spoiling "Snape Kills Dumbledore" was going to do something. I bet you thought personal attacks on Jessi Slaughter was a super fun time when you could have ignored her and got youtube to pull her videos down (I mean what was she going to do? Go round to your houses and throw bricks through windows?). I bet you thought somehow all the companies that stopped associating with Wikileaks were all going to be destroyed beyond repair because you all did a mass visitation of their sites. And I bet you think somehow you're going to be sticking it to the man with your latest stunt against Quantico. There's a reason people treat you as a joke, and it's not because they think you're ha-ha funny.

Oh by the way, I'm actually having a big lol as I type this. No not mad, I'm just telling it as it is.

Just go back to what you're good for; undermining scientology and tell me when you've confiscated some stress tests.

>>23
>>24
http://www.politicolnews.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/02/tiananmen-square-tank1.jpg
Yeah you're right, this guy is
just a kid who thinks standing in front of a tank with shopping bags is going to stop it

What a stupid twat, fucking fuck up. I HATE HIM SO MUCH WHOOAAARG

>>25
Can you understand the difference between an example and a real life incident? That man may have been taken off and beaten. He faced his attackers. He had much more integrity and bravery than 1000 of you anons who just sit behind a computer and "hack hack hack huuuurrrr, I has details on evil companies that oppose my beloved Assange and Manning. Now I'll post it all over the internetz and I am hero for freedom!".
Perhaps you should try facing your enemies face-to-face with your information.
No? Okay then.

i said good riddance, kids playing robinhood on my internet. fuck it.

it's fun and all, but don't troll the fatmans too much mkay lol fatboys vs fatmans. 10bucks for teh internet!

>>26
We may only have 1/1000th of the bravery but if there are 2000 of us it adds up to twice the bravery. Learn more math.

>>29
That's the most retarded use of math I've ever heard. If you all have 1/1000th of the bravery, you're all going to still pussy out when someone with double the confidence and hardassery faces up to you. You're just grasping at straws now.

>>30
Sometimes 1000 straws are better than a wooden pole. You can't sweep a floor with just a wooden pole, you must attach the straws to the bottom.

>>31
Oh, please. Just stop clutching at straws and justifying internet vigilantism. It's getting old and pathetic. Kind of like everyone else sees "hacktivists".

>>32
Hm. Well, if everyone thinks it, it must be true!

-

Tree of liberty. Blood of patriots. Being American doesn't mean blind obedience.  In fact, treason is the oldest American tradition from before America was even a free nation. Revolution, fuck yeah!

>>32
I am clutching at straws because they are a resource unlike the rigid though noble pole, because their properties are different they have utility, they lack the strength of the pole but this weakness is their strength as it allows them to bend and curve and svelt picking up the flotsam debris of dust and dirt, that the floor may be swept clean.

>>36
What are you even talking about there?

>>37
If you need honor defined, you don't have it.

>>38
?
what are YOU talking about there?

>>38
Seriously, what are you talking about? Door's over there. Havn't you got some vigilante hacktevism to do?

Eh my grandfather died so some greedy corporate capitalists could invade another country, and i'm not getting anything for it?!?! i drive a truck and drink budweiser and just learned how to use the internet. I support democracy and patriotism, except when i see it in action. waaaaaah... nice source... AFP?

>>>>
Copyright © 2011 AFP. AFP text, photos, graphics and logos shall not be used for commercial purposes, reproduced, published, broadcast, rewritten for broadcast or publication or redistributed directly or indirectly in any medium. AFP shall not be held liable for any delays, inaccuracies, errors or omissions in any AFP content, or for any actions taken in consequence. AFP materials may not be stored in whole or in part in a computer except for personal non-commercial use. As a newswire service AFP does not obtain release from the subjects, individuals, groups or entities contained in its photographs, graphics or quoted in its text. Further, no clearance is obtained from the owners of any trademarks or copyrighted material where the marks and material are included in AFP photos or content. You shall be solely responsible for obtaining any and all the necessary releases from whatever individual or entity is necessary for any of your uses of AFP material. You agree to indemnify AFP from any losses, damages and expenses (including reasonable attorney fees) it incurs as a result of any claim based on your use of its materials in violation of these terms.
>>>>

Sounds like a cover-my-ass-when-people-find-out-that-we're-completely-lying-to-these-people disclaimer.

>

>>39
I'm talking about freedom. What are you talking about?
>>40
>I don't have a counter-argument.
No major changes were won by some nut willing to take extreme actions, they were won when the general masses lifted a finger, you can kill one nut and launch a smear campaign against him but you can't gun down 90% of the population. The civil rights movement was a success only because conservative/moderate middle America came to the conclusion that the black struggle was about liberty, not race, not marxists screaming "BLACK IS BEAUTIFUL" hysterically, in fact the marxists only provided a propoganda coup for the racists.

Incidentally tianamen square failed because it involved a few individuals taking extreme action as opposed to a majority taking moderate action. The moderate majority in China obtained gradual economic liberalization and the economic and technological development that has alleviated so much poverty in China.

We look to history for facts with which to make predictions, the facts indicate that's the only way to get shit done. I'm not interested in "sticking it to the man", I don't care what happens to evil banksters and their billions, I only care about solving problems in the world, if murdering banksters helps the poor and downtrodden then this is what I'll do, if it only causes more problems then I won't, but I will be doing whatever most logically fixes society.

If you're somehow offended by the idea that someone has put more thought into this than you, well, you're just going to ahve to deal with it but I would prefer it if you'd adopt my mindset.

>>43
yeah!

I think we should respect the government. Obama knows what's best for us.

>>43
See, you just ruin any argument you might have when you say things like "..."if murdering banksters helps the poor and downtrodden then this is what I'll do.,,,"
Anytime you put that option on the table, you admit that you are just as debased as the people whom you claim are the debasers.

>>46
See, you just ruin any argument you might have when you say things like "See, you just ruin any argument you might have when you say things like 'See, you just ruin any argument you might have when you say things like...'"

>>47
Very hurt in his butt.

>>44
That's right!
>>46
I was speaking hypothetically, this isn't necessarily what I would do if I decided to undertake extreme actions, I'm just saying bro. What is it exactly us V for Vendetta masked anons should be doing?
>>47
You're not me.
>>48
47's not me, I swear.

>>47
hahahaha

ITT:
Libfags get buttmad when everyone else tells them they're a bunch of wannabe hacktavists because they think a traitor who's being treated within the boundaries of military conduct is being treated "unfairly".

if you wanna help get your hands on stuxnet

>>52
Sounds like fun. Planning to hit weakileaks with it? You have my sword...

hit the whole world with it the key to real transparency