>>39
I'm talking about freedom. What are you talking about?
>>40
>I don't have a counter-argument.
No major changes were won by some nut willing to take extreme actions, they were won when the general masses lifted a finger, you can kill one nut and launch a smear campaign against him but you can't gun down 90% of the population. The civil rights movement was a success only because conservative/moderate middle America came to the conclusion that the black struggle was about liberty, not race, not marxists screaming "BLACK IS BEAUTIFUL" hysterically, in fact the marxists only provided a propoganda coup for the racists.
Incidentally tianamen square failed because it involved a few individuals taking extreme action as opposed to a majority taking moderate action. The moderate majority in China obtained gradual economic liberalization and the economic and technological development that has alleviated so much poverty in China.
We look to history for facts with which to make predictions, the facts indicate that's the only way to get shit done. I'm not interested in "sticking it to the man", I don't care what happens to evil banksters and their billions, I only care about solving problems in the world, if murdering banksters helps the poor and downtrodden then this is what I'll do, if it only causes more problems then I won't, but I will be doing whatever most logically fixes society.
If you're somehow offended by the idea that someone has put more thought into this than you, well, you're just going to ahve to deal with it but I would prefer it if you'd adopt my mindset.