ANTIFA

FUCK U NAZI SCUM!!!!!!!!!!!

>>1
Hey there, check the hate.  It's what they thrive on.

>>2
all bAsh ur fookin HEaD N u FUCKin FARSCIST!!!11!

VIVA la REVOLUCION!!!

NIE WIEDER FASCISMUS

BERKELEY 4 LYFE FUCK DA POPO!!!!

>>5
More proof that fascism is a left wing ideology.

>>6
Of course it is. But the majority of people don't understand how the political spectrum works.

>>7
How does it work?

>>8
Right wing (good guys) = christian conservatives
Left wing (bad guys) = atheist nazi commie islamist libruls

>>8
On the extreme far-right, there is no government.

On the extreme far-left, 100% total government.

A Constitutional limited government is somewhat in the middle of these two extremes.

>>9
Stereotypes aside, yes most of these types of people promote or support these kinds of things. Especially Nazis and Communists. I'm not very religious myself, however I'd love to see the government go back to its more Constitutional ways. I'm sure some Atheists out there who would like to see a government limited by Constitutional bounds.

>>10

>On the extreme far-left, 100% total government.

The Anarchists disagree with you.

>>11
The Anarchists then do not understand the true political spectrum. They're extreme far-right, not extreme far-left. Saying they're far-left wing spreads confusion.

No such thing as right or left. Only up or down. Tyranny can take many forms. Why limit yourselves to believing there are only two choices?

>>10
Right-wing doesn't mean what you think it means.

>>14
Oh no? Then what does it really mean then? Right-wing has always meant less government. The old generations of the Republican party had always favored less government. That's how the true political spectrum is.

>>15
Right-wing is a term that predates the GOP.  It predates both of our modern parties, as a matter of fact.  It is social conservatism, not the libertarianism you have it confused with.  Please read books, then try lecturing people about "the true political spectrum."  I'm sure you'll still be laughably wrong, though.

>>16
You have any sources or book that state such? Of course it predates GOP, ect., but that doesn't mean the idea is any different.