I'm gay and I was born this way!

This thread is too FABULOUS bitch~~

gb2/bed/ perez hilton

FAG

>>3
Which is an acronym for Fabulously Amazing Guy~~

tee hee hee~~

Congratulations!  Now wipe the shit off of your dick, the come off of your chin, and post something interesting.

tee hee hee

>>5

dont be a hater bro, i love fags more girls for da rewst of us juyst hope dey dont rape ya pretty boi

AH COME ON FUCK A GUY

>>5
Oh you, you're a real cock tease you know that!

hee hee hee~~

>>6
Wasn't hating, just expressing apathy.

>>8
Yeah, I can't help that I'm attractive to everyone.

>>2
Why did you have to age a 5 day old thread that received no replies until you?

>>10
I don't know. May I suck your dick?

>>11
I don't know.
OK.
May I suck your dick?
NO.

>>12
NO.

Well SOMEONE's uncomfortable with his fabulousness... er, sexuality~ ;P

Is your willie confused?
http://dis.4chan.org/read/lounge/1240905153/

>>12
Those who are defensive are usually the ones who realize they are homosexual.

>>12
Wow, that's a pretty strong reaction. What are you compensating for?

I don't like gays, but the enemy of my enemy (= the muslims) is my friend.

Don't like gays?  The Muslims are your enemy?  You need to catch up.  Intelligent people have known for quite a while now that generalizing entire groups of people is dangerous and counterproductive.  And I doubt you're really old enough to know what it is to have an enemy.

>>18
But you just generalized an entire group too! Gotta love that evolutionary survival mechanism, huh?

>>19
Nope, quantified not generalized.
Big difference.

>>20
Okay then I'll quantify too.
"Intelligent people know that >>20 is retarded"

Think so?  Bring it on.  So far you don't even seem able to post anything other than weak, unoriginal insults.

>>22
I only insult people who insult me! At least I think so... I have memory problems

Sophistry, and non-sequitur. Your usual.  Really, is that all you've got?  Pathetic.

>>1
puto
pefiero ener gripa de cochi a ser joto
achi achiu
cough cough

pork soda is far more intelligent than self righteous wine sipping leftist

>>26
Hi. You must have gone incognito there.

>>24
Plz don't use latin words! I have bad memories of that, my parents forced me to study latin in my first year of  highschool. Fuck that shit, I failed it completely (17/100 on my final exam). Thank god they let me pass on the condition that I wouldn't take latin anymore.

>>28
>I failed

Seems to be your modus operandi.

>>29
I snickered
（　≖‿≖）

>>26
And for the record, self righteous?  maybe... or maybe just righteous.  Wine sipping?  Don't drink much, can't stand wine.  and Leftist?  Far from it. My beliefs aren't two dimensional.

>>27
>>31
Maybe you're not a self-righteous wine sipping leftist, you could well be a self-justified caramel macchiato sipping social libertarian, I don't know everything. Lack of omnipotency however does not mean a total lack of knowledge, I do know that only some kind of fruity hipster could achieve that level of smug "IM A PARIAH OF OBJECTIVITY AND REASON" narcissism so there was some accuracy behind my original statement.

For the record most people are aware their beliefs are flawed, the thing is science is inherantly inconclusive so all beliefs are flawed. Maybe as a god of science you need not concern yourself with ideas such as "I am not perfect", but us mere mortals afflicted by fallibility and have to judge ideas by their merits.

>>32
Your "original statement"?  I can't even tell what your original statement was.  Are you pork soda, and if so have you also posted anonymously in this thread?
I tell you this.  I did not post >>27.  For the record I posted #'s 5 and 9, then left it alone 'till Porkribs decided to malign Gays and Islam.  From 18 I responded at 20, 22, 24, 29, and 31.  So I suspect either you have been trolled a bit, and/or I am being trolled now.  I don't especially care though.  The only original statement I have been responding to is >>17, and my challenge was a response to being called "retarded" by Milksoda at >>21.
I don't know...Porksoda4k doesn't seem the type to abandon his name out of simple fear, so I'm gonna assume that you're someone else and just deal with your ridiculous post.
I've never claimed omnipotency; only alluded to righteousness in the face of hatred, and the courage to defend my beliefs.
Your unfounded assumptions as to my being a "caramel macchiato sipping social libertarian" are as far off as those in >>26.  As to my being "self justified", well, I don't believe I am any more so than the the average person.  I'm here ready to back up my shit in a dialog; you know, to have my ideas judged on their merits.  Let's see who's self justified.  In front of an audience.  I can't really define "fruity hipster", but I can define pariah.  I think you meant to say paragon.  You better look that up.  It's not the kind of mistake you'd want to make where it might matter.  And don't confuse confidence with narcissism.  That last line in your post is just a sad little version of a sarcastic "Well I guess we're all not perfect like you" comment.  It's petulant and weak.  I'm already courting a TL;DR so I'm out, but if you were serious, and choose to respond, I suggest you read up, let it sink in, and respond intelligently.  'Cause I'll ignore another post as weak as 32.

>>33
Wow, hyperbole and wild accusations are an element of the 4chan experience, roll with it.

Anyway the main part of my post was the following.

>For the record most people are aware their beliefs are flawed, the thing is science is inherantly inconclusive so all beliefs are flawed.

Porkrib's argument had flaws but parts of it were true, there are some serious problems with muslims and the muslims world and it's a perfectly reasonable stance to consider them enemies when they act like animals.

Where did all the fabulousness go? Oh right, Maine.