/newpol/ - should cities be banned

Name: Anonymous 2008-05-25 9:56

i say yes

benefits:
less healthcare costs (cities=crime/pollution/lack of exercise)
higher productivity (no hangovers from clubbing)
more farm land will be used to produce useful products (food, bio-fuels)
cleaner environment
less house fires
less car accidents

Name: Anonymous 2008-05-25 12:01

Wat. How the fuck do you ban a city? I agree with what the benefits are but.. Yeah no, that's not gonna happen.

Name: Anonymous 2008-05-25 12:49

butthurt ruralfags

Name: Anonymous 2008-05-25 13:35

>>2

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fall_of_Nineveh
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Atlanta_Campaign
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bombing_of_Dresden_in_World_War_II
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Atomic_bombings_of_Hiroshima_and_Nagasaki

etc..

Name: Anonymous 2008-05-25 15:05

>>4
Dresden is banned? Guess I passed through an illegal city then 2 years ago.

Name: Anonymous 2008-05-25 15:36

>>1

Fuck you, countryside should be banned. Cities are the only reason why we won't need to spend a ridiculous amount of money commuting everywhere. Imagine having to drive 25 miles to the nearest grocery store when gas is $12 a gallon.

Name: Anonymous 2008-05-25 16:38

>>6
Full figured pre-op nigger.

Name: Anonymous 2008-05-25 16:51

>>6
Where would we grow food?

Name: Anonymous 2008-05-25 17:04

>>8
deep in your ass

Name: Anonymous 2008-05-26 19:02

Check Khmer Rogue. Fun times without cites.
COMMIE WORKCAMPS FTL

should cities be banned

1 Name: Anonymous 2008-05-25 9:56

2 Name: Anonymous 2008-05-25 12:01

3 Name: Anonymous 2008-05-25 12:49

4 Name: Anonymous 2008-05-25 13:35

5 Name: Anonymous 2008-05-25 15:05

6 Name: Anonymous 2008-05-25 15:36

7 Name: Anonymous 2008-05-25 16:38

8 Name: Anonymous 2008-05-25 16:51

9 Name: Anonymous 2008-05-25 17:04

10 Name: Anonymous 2008-05-26 19:02