As much as I'd like to see Clinton in office, I do not wish McCain to win the presidency. However, face the facts - Hillary has a very slim chance at this point. If it's inevitable that Obama wins the primary, we should at least refrain from further sabotaging his upcoming fight with McCain, rite?
Name:
Anonymous2008-05-12 14:20
>>1
No.
She must continue to destroy Obama's chances against McCain while simutaneously driving a wedge into the democrat party and shattering it for the next 25 years.
Name:
Anonymous2008-05-12 14:52
hillary is a butthurt whore that will never quit
too bad she's a despicable bitch, and can never win either the primaries or the election fairly
Name:
Anonymous2008-05-13 0:40
She will run for president regardless and ruin the democrats
Name:
Anonymous2008-05-15 3:45
she should use all of her political influence to get McCain assasinated so Ron Paul can take over. Then the Republicans are sure to win!!
>>9
It's nice that you built yourself a dreamworld so you can escape from your failure at real life, but I'm just scared that you'll do something stupid when truth smacks you in the face.
Then again, you can always ignore truth. That's how you became a libertarian in the first place, after all...
Name:
Anonymous2008-05-16 14:57
No Hillary fans on 4chan. Fact.
Name:
Anonymous2008-05-17 2:25
she should not concede. these calls for the process to finish prematurely because of partisan considerations is unprecedented and reprehensible. people should really educate themselves about the way the system works before they start whining about whatever it is they want out of it.
Name:
Anonymous2008-05-17 5:21
>>10
But you instructed me to replace "loling" with "crying", thus...
"I will be the one loling when Ron Paul is inaugurated in November."
becomes...
"I will be the one crying when Ron Paul is inaugurated in November."
That doesn't make any sense since I am the one who supports Ron Paul.
Name:
Anonymous2008-05-17 8:46
>>13
Since you are an average Ron Paul supporter, it is natural for you not to understand the underlying meaning. Since there is no possibility of Ron Paul being inaugurated, when that happens you'll be crying. I hope you understand that now, and will be more at peace with reality next time.
Name:
Anonymous2008-05-17 9:03
>>14
But "I will be the one crying when Ron Paul is inaugurated in November." does not mean what you were trying to say, so why did you instruct me to cry when Ron Paul is inaugurated?
Name:
Anonymous2008-05-17 9:28
>>15
I just explained in >>14, but it seems that your mind still can't comprehend a very clearly laid-out explanation too. Anyways, I'm sure you'll instinctively know what to do when nothing like that happens in November.
Name:
Anonymous2008-05-17 9:44
Hillary didn't anticipate the magnitude of raep from Obama.
Name:
Anonymous2008-05-17 10:01
>>17
yeah she really phoned it in. too much sense of entitlement and such.
i know she tried to keep bill at arm's length because everyone thought he would be detrimental to her campaign (because of that stupid and ever-popular dynasty non-argument) but i am convinced that the moment he opened his mouth (his own mouth i mean, not that crazy puppeteer's who controlled him) they would have won that election.
Name:
Anonymous2008-05-17 11:41
Dems are retarded.
Hillary would have had a much better shot at beating McCain than Obama.
McCain will crush Obama, by possibly 40 states.
Name:
Anonymous2008-05-17 11:52
Obama seems so fragile. When he was battling Hillary he seemed meek. They weren't going all out on each other anyway because they're "family". But now that Bush and McCain are throwing punches at him the stark contrast makes him look.. frankly kinda weak. I don't think he'll last a week once he's nominated.
Name:
Anonymous2008-05-17 12:12
>>19
Obvious closet-hillary supporter is obvious. All republicans secretly want Hillary to somehow win the nomination so that she could easily get owned in the elections.
Name:
Anonymous2008-05-17 12:24
Clinton II? Awesoem.
Name:
Anonymous2008-05-17 12:58
>>19 here.
DEFINETLY not a Hillary supporter, I'm a conservative.
I'm actually relieved that Obama is getting the nomination.
Hillary won all the states that matter in a general election.
McCain is no great candidate in my eyes, but he's a helluva lot better than the Marxist Obama.
>>23
>Marxist Obama.
Where did you guys get the memo which exposed everyone as communist, and even Bush as socialist? I must have missed where Obama was abolishing private property and inheritance and taking the power from bourgeoisie to form a proletarian dictatorship with promises to form an egalitarian communist society with no state.
Either that, or you are a retard who doesn't know what he's talking about. Hmm, I wonder which...
>>24
WOW! Someone here at /newpol/ gets real defensive when someone mentions Marxism....Hmmm, I wonder why......
Name:
Anonymous2008-05-17 19:33
>>26
>Wow! Someone here at /newpol/ gets really pissed when retards spurt out ignorance and retardation, and they also get butthurt when they are proven wrong! Hmm.... I wonder why? Maybe he actually knows things and shows people when they're wrong? No, no... It must be because he's A SOSHALIST!! LIEK BUSH!!!!! EEEVIL SOSHALIST AND HIS KNOWLEDGE!!!!
Name:
Anonymous2008-05-17 20:49
WOW! The butthurtness in this post >>27 is almost immeasureable.
Someone has had their Marxism exposed and feels like lashing out.
It's o.k, comrade, You keep on lashing if it makes you feel better.
DERP DERP DERP DERP DERP DERP DERP DERP.....
Name:
Anonymous2008-05-17 20:54
>>28
Come back when you can argue with facts, rather than crying X IS MARKSIST/SOSHALIST/IDUNLIEKITABAWWWWWWWWWWWW
Name:
Anonymous2008-05-17 21:00
Here's an obvious fact: >>29 is butthurt and OWNED.
The only reason welfare has "worked" thus far is because the 1st world minority has had a monopoly over the earth's industrial resources and we were rich enough to support our nation's lazy. As the era of peace and democracy that neoconservatism has brought forth culminates in economic development across the globe the US will have to accept that it must now compete economically with those it used to compete with militarily (an acceptable trade in my opinion, god bless America, Reagan, Bush I and Bush II) and relinquish much of it's power to multinational corporations (most of which are grounded in the US anyway).
In b4 "BAAWWW EVIL CONSERVATIVES THROW ORPHANS OUT INTO THE SNOW". Welfare for those whom there is no alternative will have it, it's the unemployed able bodied adults will just have to do without strippers, alcohol and marijuana for the week or two they are in between jobs.
>>33
Here is a retard who doesn't see the consequences of no welfare. Trinkets of welfare is a cheaper way out than nigger revolts.
Name:
Anonymous2008-05-19 16:48
>>34
Here is a retard who doesn't see the consequences of rewarding the niggers for TNB. Cut them off, I say, and use the TNB temper tantrum as justification for rounding them up, cattle-prodding them onto leaky Liberty ships, and giving them a one-way trip to Liberia.
Who could be against a plan like this? Other than niggers, kikes, and self-hating whites who suffer from white liberal guilt?
Name:
Anonymous2008-05-19 17:53
>>35
Again, the retard cries about RAESEZ while what matter is money.
Name:
Anonymous2008-05-19 18:55
>>36
Niggers cost America 700 billion dollars a year in lost productivity and infrastructure damage due to crime and TNB.
Name:
Anonymous2008-05-19 18:58
>>36
Throwing money at the problem has worked real well hasn't it, jigaboo?
6 trillion dollars wasted so far since Johnson's "War on Poverty" and what has it gotten us?
Answer: Just as many poor bastards as there were before.
Name:
Anonymous2008-05-19 19:02
>>38
The objective of the "Great Society" programs was to buy the nigger vote for the Democratic Party in perpetuity. "Hey bro! We will stick a gun in Whitey's face and take his shit away and give it to you! Vote for us and we'll stick it to the honkeys and give you free shit! It's just like raping a white bitch except you can't go to jail for it!"