Stuff White People Like

http://stuffwhitepeoplelike.wordpress.com/

This site is obviously written by affluent white/Jewish liberals, and meant to be a satire of this subset of the white population, but they just use "white people" instead of clarifying that. It's interesting it associates all kinds of cultural things with whiteness. It's perpetuating reverse-racial stereotypes. It may as well call itself "stuff black people don't like". I bet the same liberal whites who write this blog would call you "racist" if you said "stuff black people like" is chicken, basketball and rap music.

I'd call this "liberal racism", subtly promoting the idea of white cultural superiority (something liberals are aware of), but because they act like they are making fun of themselves it's acceptable and not politically incorrect.

Doesn't EVERYBODY like chicken?

Yes, I know, gb2/ck/

>>1
I'd call you butthurt, as your need to make this post stemmed from you fitting so fucking well with the sterotypical hick definition. I mean, why else bother?

>>3
CRY MOAR LIBFAG

>>1
As someone who likes to promote equality I disapprove of this sort of hypocritical ZOMG RACISM TO WHITE PEOPLE SO ITS OK LOL idiocy. However, I don't get too bothered about it based on the differences in white and minority average social status and incomes. I'd have a white person's more comparatively comfortable lifestyle instead of being able to enjoy a few bad jokes against someone of a different skin colour to you.

tl;dr while brown people can comfortably laugh at white people and not vice-versa, white people generally get the last laugh every day, so you right-wingers should calm down.

>>4
It's funny because the post exposed how you were crying yourself...

'Racism towards whites' is not an issue because we generally don't have any insecurities on the subject, and only ones who get butthurt and cry about it are retarded racists, whose insecurities are self-evident in the reasoning behind their beliefs.

>>6
The only whites who get angry when their race is mocked are racists? That's magic, your post made good sense up until that bit.

OP here and I wasn't suggesting this is "racist" against whites, quite the opposite. It gives a certain (positive) stereotype to whites in my view, associating most cultural things ("books", "plays", "grad school" etc) with whites. Just strange this kind of stereotyping is acceptable to liberals, even though it's implying non-white people are not cultured, which the same liberals would denounce as racism.

>>7
Who else does, when someone makes stupid remarks a la >>1 (no, I didn't bother reading the whole thing, but I lol'd when I saw New Balance shoes, as that's what I consistently wear)

If you got butthurt by that, I have bad news for you.

>>8
I think it's more the issue that if something like this were to appear that said things like 'black people love their fried chicken, and they get through so much of the stuff they take pride in saying theirs is the best through years of practise' or 'the black man loves the company of his fellow black man, in fact you'll rarely find him in groups of less than ten when outside' then there would be a 'racist' shitstorm even though it is merely outlining how great friend chicken can taste when made by someone who's familiy has a history of making it for generations, or how black people generally have better social groups than whites and are more sociable. Well that's not negative, so where's the problem?

It's all about the stereotyping and it's association with mocking. People don't like to be stereotyped and when it's linked to racial groups you get into dangerous waters. It's just a form of traditional racism that has been flipped upside down then put in a mirror, and still comes out seeming discriminatory.

RACISM IS AWESOME!!!

All the cool kids at my school are all like, "We hate niggers and spics and chinks!"

I'm still waiting for a stuffblackpeoplelike blog to surface.

>>12
watermelons, chicken, basketball and your bike. there.

>>11
http://podblanc.com/boss-nigger

>>8

Huh? You're not very smart, then. The only person who would take the satire as an implication that non-whites do not posess these "qualities" would be a racist or at the very least a slight bigot.

>>10

Of course it does. Stereotyping individuals, even for the sake of being general, is a collectivist trait that serves the ego of the collectivist itself. Anything non-inclusive is going to seem some what discriminatory no matter what the race. It's more ethically sound to raceless, but if you're raceless and you don't understand it in the context of stuff like this, then you're a part of the problem. I think some posters here said it best- your over concern damns you.

Saying nigger is perfectly fine where I'm from. I go around saying such phrases as "what's going on nigger" and "this my nigger right here" all the time and black people do not complain.

http://www.stormfront.org/forum/showthread.php/stuffwhitepeoplelike-com-465275.html
http://www.stormfront.org/forum/showthread.php/things-white-people-like-469986.html

"...Misdirected hostilities...that's what you got!" -311
Afterall, how do you express hate for yourself? For whatever is in the mind is what is practiced and expressed.

ITT: people don't know what liberalism is

>>19
BAWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWW

>>19
Wrong, my friend.
We know full well what liberalism is.
It's homo nigger worship, pure and simple.

Right, my enemy.
I know empty well that liberalism is not.
It's not hetero unification disputes, unpure and complicated.

1+1=2

>>23
BBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWW

CRY HARDER BUTTHURT FAGGOT, THE VERY FACT YOU ARE ARGUING WITH ME MEANS YOU ARE A STORMFAG REDNECK LIVING IN A TRAILER IN THE DEEP SOUTH WITH HIS MOM-SISTER-WIFE-DAUGHTER (same person)

ANYONE WHO STATES A FACT I DON'T LIKE IS A RACIST, WHEN WILL YOU FAGGOTS LEARN?

>>24
facepalm.png

The style is very simple, why do you pathetic retards even fail at copying it?

>>25
You and I both know that the basis for your bost heartfelt ideals is the belief that the only people who disagree with you are butthurt stormfags. In truth you are not that intelligent and enjoy conforming to social liberalism purely because you want to feel important and comfort your anxieties. Why not think for yourself for a change!

>>26
Unfortunately, you are wrong, but that is to be expected from a pathetically ignorant organism who uses phrases like 'social liberalism'. Why not think for a change?

>26
Social liberal is merely a more accurate term for liberals whom sympathise with the works of renowned fantasist and demagogue Karl Marx. And I am thinking for myself since I am neither fully social liberal or conservative.

>>27
Social liberal is merely a more accurate term for liberals whom sympathise with the works of renowned fantasist and demagogue Karl Marx. And I am thinking for myself since I am neither fully social liberal or conservative.

>>28
>>29
Not only you can't post properly, but your ignorance is exposed by your misclassification once again. So these people sypmhatize with Marx, whom you deemed DEMAGOGE AND FANTAZIST with your infinite wisdom which can't even classify things properly, nor has any comprehension of economics, but these 'social liberals', somehow do the polar opposite of what Marx says, but of course you heard that SOSHALIZM was bad, and you heard that LIBRALZ were bad, but your brain didn't have the capacity for more poles than one, so you grouped them in 'social liberal'. Wondrous.

>>30
Oh, I should add, that I am not a 'soshal libral', but of course I don't expect you to understand such complicated things.

>>30
I said they sympathised with marxism, not that they are (officially) marxists.

Just like your inability to comprehend the idea that a government may be partially socialist you cannot comprehend the idea that an individual is partially marxist. It is clear to me now that you can never see why you are wrong as you are incapable of understanding things of a certain complexity.

Perhaps you should consider just accept your place, like a dog accepts that his master can drive a car and open a tin of food even though it does not understand how it's master does so.

>>32
So, these people symphatize with marxism, but aren't OFFICIALLY in it, so they do polar opposite, riight. I don't think such people exist, my retarded friend. It is something your tiny mind fabricated to fit in SOSHALISTS and LIBRALZ together because it doesn't have any capacity whatsoever.


And, of course, according to your "thinking" something can be partly "socialist" and mostly right-wing, yet this makes it a socialist government, riight [not to mention, the things you mention aren't generally even partly socialist, but you think statism is socialism and even that somehow makes bush socialist, due to the aforementioned retardation I believe]. I know you are too retarded to understand this, but it is clear to everyone with a brain so I'll skip humiliating you more on this issue.

The rest of your post of course exposes how butthurt you've gotten during the perpetual ownage phase, as it lacks any reasoning on why. My suggestion to you, as always, is for you to cease crying and face what kind of retarded bullshit you, and only you believe in.