Chance to prove race doesn't exist.

Debunk everything in this book to prove there is no reason to believe race doesn't exist.
http://www.charlesdarwinresearch.org/Race_Evolution_Behavior.pdf

>>80
Your micropenis, which is the cause of all the butthurt feelings and angst in you, can actually produce semen? I'm truly astounded.

Clearly, this is one of the more intelligent debates on /newpol/.

Maybe this place should be a transportation textboard or something...

>>82
gtfo pole smoker.

Yeah, >>82, you're no friend of the proletariat!

Are you guys for real or are you just spanking your monkeys? Of course race and gender and all forms of segregation exist, part of that is what makes us individuals; but, WTF is this talk of that it doesn't exist at all? Oh, to dismiss or deny things that have undesireable traits (pretty much the things that make us human) are repressed just the same as all things and it pisses me off every time I have to read it on asshole threads like these! SUCK MY BUMPY COCK YOU HORNY DEVILS!!!! BLAAAAAHHH!!!

>>84
Ahahaha so you admit you're yet another fruity college libfaggot, shouldn't you be tempting your sociology/liberal arts/african american studies professor to reach into your pants?

>>85
Specifically the libfags are blaming all the differences on "social constructs" despite scientifically valid evidence, both observable and genetic, that racial differences are not entirely environmental. I can understand if they were profoundly affected by racism, but most of these people have lived pleasant lives in a 1st world country pretty much free from racism yet are convinced they are living in a dystopia oppressed by "the man" and everything is racist.

>>87
>SCIENCE
"Science" somehow believed only by basement retards, right.

>>88
No.
http://www.charlesdarwinresearch.org/Race_Evolution_Behavior.pdf

>>89
You do realize that it is the same crap that was posted in the beginning of the thread, which was pointed out to be irrelevant for racism, not to mention the fact that racism is a belief exclusive to basement retards, I think your explanation was "the jew media suppresses the truth, so the scientists can't speak about this TRUTH they accidentally disproved last century".

>>90
When did that happens? Link pls.

>>90
which was pointed out to be irrelevant for racism
'pointed out' != proving.

>>92
Oh, I see, saying 2+2=/=5 doesn't make sense for people of your intelligence...

>>93
It does, but you haven't said that. Merely saying that racial differences are irrelevant for racism (which is, basically, a label for people recognising racial differences) which is on its face ridiculous doesn't magically make it so. Moreover, your hissy fit about 'jew media' (only mentioned by you or your camp >>25 >>32 >>38 >>90 in this thread in supposed support of denial of racial differences) and your constant appeals to anonymous authority about race being disproved when all recent studies say otherwise (that human genetic variation is clustered and falls across geographic lines). Stop projecting your childish, basement-dweller thoughts onto others and cry moar libfag.

>>94
More denial, and apparently you don't realize there are people outside this textboard. What exactly is your excuse for the fact that only retarded basement dwellers are racist? Because previous responses I got were "evil libfag media covers the truth" etc.

>>95
1) Well, since a lot of biologists and physical anthropologists are, er, racists:
http://www3.interscience.wiley.com/journal/112759433/abstract
Responses to surveys of faculty at Ph.D.-granting departments indicate that 67% of biologists accept the concept of biological races in the species Homo sapiens, while only 50% of physical anthropologists do so.
I don't see how your statement holds weight. But this doesn't matter. Academia is in a state of filth anyway due to both neocon and leftist interventions. Facts and empirical data do.

2) I don't think it's the libfag media 'covering the truth' in the case of human ecology -- in fact I'm pretty sure they don't, for the most part. There's a LOT more bias when it comes to psychometrics. The only people still advancing the idea that race is a social construct are political radicals, basement dwellers, and people with a really low spatial intelligence.

I can explain at length your egregious lack of judgement if you wish to tell me WHY (specific arguments) you think that race is an invalid taxon for humans. If you'll continue with ad hominems, appeals to anonymous authority or appeals to ignorance that are bunk now (early studies of the genome), I win.

>>95
>What exactly is your excuse for the fact that only retarded basement dwellers are racist?

I remember this one time with alot of college friends, all considered themselfs "liberals", all would denounce racism in public. This one time I was down the pub with them, and I was drunk and thought I'd test thier reactions so I just say "Look at the fucking nigger over there!" and they all looked, none of them girls and boys about six of them said a word to me about it or since. Was really incredible.
On a later date I said "nig nog" about some black person standing about looking though, my lady friend pipes up and tells me about her experiance in a local town where she went into a club and to her horror it was almost all negro. And I go (just for kicks) "Yeah, fucking jungle monkies taking over the country. Why we don't stop all blacks comming here I don't know. Fucking bunch of animals", and she agreed.
Shit is hilarious, honestly. You don't have to be as extreme as me, people know me as an very extreme and ecentric person, they let alot of shit slide with me beacuse I'm not serious 70% of the time. Just do it lightly and build up, a little racist slip wilst ur drunk ect. It's fun to see how people really feel when they think they know your position.

I'm not really racist tho. I couldn't give a shit tbh. If I see a nigger I think nigger, if I see a paki I think paki. Even if I see a white man I can think "nigger" sometimes.

>>97
The only logical conclusion is that you are a nigger, since niggers are allowed by libfags to say nigger.
Other supporting evidence:
themselfs [...] thier [...] experiance [...] monkies [...] comming [...] ecentric [...] beacuse [...] wilst

>>96
Of course "you win", with perpetual denial and citing irrelevant stuff. BIYOLOJISTS ARE RAEESIZST, right, but as it has been repeatedly told and your retarded mind couldn't comprehend, this "biological races" crap you are crying about is as meaningful as you being related to your own fucking family, and holds no applicable meaning. The rest of the crying about NIGGER AYE-KWOO BAWWW has been conclusively disproven by nature vs. nurture research, and even if it wasn't it doesn't warrant your butthurt delusions to feel better about your pathetic self and discrimination. Reminds me of how craniometry was "scientific basis" for slavery once, even though it had absolutely no meaning.

Enjoy your retardation, and BAWWW AD HOMINEM BAWWWW EVEN THOUGH THE ONLY WAY A PERSON COULD BRING ITSELF TO BELIEVE IN SUCH PATHETICALLY STUPID THINGS IS BEING EITHER RETARDED OR IGNORANT BEYOND OBLIVION BAAAWWWWWW

>>98
Yes, it's true.
Recent studies have shown that >>97 is a nigger.

>>100
But those studies also imply the very high probability of you being a nigger.

>>97
YHL HAND

>>99
You are truly delusional. Relatedness, family-wise is biologically MEANINGFUL. How can you possibly deny something like that? Ever heard of KIN SELECTION you dumb cunt?
As for NIGGER AYE-KWOO, it has been conclusively proven by nature v. nurture research that it is genetics.
IQ is highly heritable.
http://www.springerlink.com/content/t0844nw244473143/
General cognitive ability yielded a heritability estimate of about .80 in two assessments 3 years apart as part of the Swedish Adoption/Twin Study of Aging. This is one of the highest heritabilities reported for a behavioral trait.
Random niggers in transracial adoption (by rich White families) still have an average gap of ~15 as opposed to random Whites adopted by rich White families, despite it supposedly being 'nurture', which cannot be explained by a falsifiable nurture theory.
Source: John Loehlin (2000) "Group Differences in Intelligence" in Sternberg (Ed.) The Handbook of Human Intelligence. pp 185. Table 9.3
As for craniometry:
http://www.people.vcu.edu/~mamcdani/Big-Brained%20article.pdf
It's relevant, idiot.

Enjoy your ignorance.

>>103
Meaningful, but irrelevant to the topic, but your retarded mind yet again can't comprehend this simple fact.

And, the fact that you cry about IQ heritability proves your ignorant retardation, as not only it is an arbitrary measure of intelligence, it has been proven to be largely dependent on environmental factors.

And of course, defending the definitively disproved centuries-old pseudoscience of craniometry is the final nail in the coffin, and proves your ignorance and retardation, yet you make a hilarious and ironic comment in the end, funny.

Also notice the fact how your retarded mind was incapable of answering not only the portion you tried to address, but also couldn't even come up with shitty excuses or more irrelevant/pseudoscientific documents about the fact that even if it was true it wouldn't justify any sort of discrimination on the individual.

Cry more, retarded racist. With every tear you expose more and more of your ignorance and inadequacies.

>>104
Full of liberal guilt.
Can't get the nigger dicks out of his mouth long enough to acknowledge the truth.

Anyway white 'mericans are like over 10% black in blood on average so everyone is a nigger here.

>>106
Ummm, yeah.
You keep thinking that, Mr. YardApe.

>>104
And, the fact that you cry about IQ heritability proves your ignorant retardation, as not only it is an arbitrary measure of intelligence, it has been proven to be largely dependent on environmental factors.
Since the heritability is ~.8 in adulthood as I had sourced and the rest is conditioned by non-shared environment, it's empirically not highly environmental.
And of course, defending the definitively disproved centuries-old pseudoscience of craniometry is the final nail in the coffin, and proves your ignorance and retardation, yet you make a hilarious and ironic comment in the end, funny.
Your anti-racial mythology has been disproved whereas my points come from peer reviewed articles.
Cry more, retarded racist. With every tear you expose more and more of your ignorance and inadequacies.
Actually, your lack of sources and appeal to libfaggotry in contrast to me makes you look like a moron. Cry more, basement revolutionary.
>>106
If that were true, there would hardly be Blacks anymore.

>>106
That'd make everybody an octoroon.  You will pardon me, of course, if I find that difficult to believe, unless you can show me some evidence, won't you?

>>99

Seriously, I'm fucking tired of you. Always writing in all caps and misspelling words attempting to make fun of people who believe there is a heritable difference in IQ between races (and failing horribly in doing so), and calling those people retarded. Why don't you explain WHY it is so retarded to think there might be a heritable difference in IQ between races?

BAAAAWWWWWWWWWW IT DOESN'T MATTER IF ONLY RETARDS AGREE WITH ME, I COPIED AND PASTED TWO SHITTY AND IRRELEVANT ARTICLES FOUND VIA GOOGLE SEARCH,   AND HOW DARE YOU MAKE FUN OF MY RETARDATION BY EXPOSING MY FALLACIOUS WAYS OF THINKING, I DARE YOU TO WASTE YOUR TIME TO FIND THINGS THAT MY RETARDED MIND WILL IGNORE, AS CLEARLY SOMEONE WHO IS SO PATHETICALLY IGNORANT AND STUPID AS ME DENIED ALL COMMON SENSE TO BECOME A RACIST IN THE FIRST PLACE, SO I'LL JUST CONTINUE CRYING NOW

>>111
nigger

>>112
Recent studies have given result contradicting presuppositions on that issue. However, you being a nigger is in no way questionable.

>>113
BLACK nigger.

>>114
DOUBLE NIGGER

>>110
Spoiler: It's a troll.

However the dedication of this particular troll whom appears in every thread with the same all caps strawman strongly suggests it is a butthurt minority attempting to emulate the bigotry he himself has been profoundly trolled by.

Such inferior specimens have had every opportunity to argue that variation between individuals within a race is more significant than variation between races and we should all be judged by merit. Unfortunately being judged by merit is the last thing these people want, it is as if they would prefer to be bullwhipped back into the cotton fields than admit they are incapable and it should be a crime to force future generations to have their corrupted genes.

>>116
Spoiler: You're a retard who got butthurt by your inability to respond to those "all caps strawman" posts, which actually expose your retardation and ignorance. Also note the hilarious self-contradiction on the latter portion of your posts, it is the retarded racists who want "special rights" so that their failure in meritocracy would be covered with privileges given to them due to their complexion, and state this explicitly. With that, I'll let you resume your crying and denial.

>>117
1) I haven't seen anyone ask for special rights, you seem to be imagining things as earlier in this thread.
2) Niggers free riding on the privileges they get from ideas of equality.

>>118
It is nice to see more self-contradicting posts from retards every day.

>>119
Your tears are still delicious.