Well, yeah. I've been noticing cooler seasons more and more. Shoot, we even have snow here at the end of April! Soon, in another 20 years, we may see it year round. Shit! I'm gonna hafta invest in a bigger heater than, huh? You know how much a big heater will cost in 20 more years, probably $24,999.99. It would probably be-hove me to get one now, while I'm on unemployment.
Global Warming is the real trend, and as the planet warms, the weather gets more extreme, and shifts all over the fucking place. That means you'll see more winter weather, not less. Global Warming doesn't mean you won't have winter. But Fox News is right there to tell us what the Capitalist Scum want us to believe -- that their dumping of gaseous pollutants isn't a problem which THEY must clean up.
Global Warming should be called instead Catastrophic Global Climate Change, but even Al Gore isn't brave enough to reveal that sort of title to the public. It doesn't matter, anyway. Greenland is melting, and the oceans are rising. We're GUARANTEED to see about 5 feet of ocean rise. Each foot of rise will erase an average of 1 mile of land inward from the present shore. Note that 5 miles of inland movement will displace about 20% of Humanity. It's the biggest Human disaster, EVER. And it's happening, slowly, now. New Orleans? GONE. Florida? GONE. Yet Fox News and the Capitalist Scum who control it, want us to keep consuming and keep wasting and keep building as if that won't ever happen. DUMB!
AH! Found a good one online, it's called a "DUTCH OVEN" seems to keep you warm all winter long, even says that there is aroma-therapy packages if you order now, FREE! just $9.95 s/h!
Name:
Anonymous2008-04-24 14:34
>>3
It's o.k., don't panic! I have carbon credits for sale! If all the corps buy from me at my discount prices, they can keep polluting non stop for the next 25 years.
It's not a money making hoax, I promise!
Name:
Anonymous2008-04-24 14:36
I love to destroy the earth.
It's the best way to make a liberal CRY!!.
>>5
Good one. Carbon credits will be the next Liberal-Democrat-Treefucker SCAM. Invariably, the rich will come out smelling like roses, while the poor and working classes will be loaded up with crushing taxes to cover all those carbon credits. Everything the poor will buy or need will have a little "tea tax" sort of stamp on it, showing that what they needed is a big carbon cost to the planet. It'll all be bullshit, like Gore's energy credits for his hugely-costly mansion in Tennessee.
We'll need another Boston Tea Party, but this time, we'll have to toss fatass Liberals and Democrats into Boston Bay. Watching Ted "Chappaquiddick" Kennedy's fat, drunken ass drown in Boston Bay is too delicious an irony to pass up.
Name:
Anonymous2008-04-24 19:47
>>7
I endorse this. Throw out the few sort-of-intelligent-like Americans so that the failure that is USA finally will fuck off and die.
Name:
Anonymous2008-04-25 15:55
Privatise the atmosphere.
Companies buy a share of the atmosphere and industries must pay to use the gases, they can then charge industries for the use of the oxygen. They will then convene once a year with other shareholders to discuss statistics, legal issues and how to use their earnings to convert the CO2 into oxygen. The oxygen companies must then prove to regulators that they are producing the amount of oxygen they were paid to remove.
>>10
I know. The state socialists would never allow it.
Name:
Anonymous2008-04-26 0:05
>>11
IM GOING TO MAKE YOUR ASS PAY FOR THE AIR YOU BREATHE
CAPS BECAUSE IM COOL
Name:
Anonymous2008-04-26 0:55
>>12
holy mother of fucking shit are you cunttardedly stupid!
I respirate using a carbon neutral fuel source (carbon in food is obtained through photosynthesis) and any additional carbon costs such as fuel for transport etc.. would be paid indirectly by the carbon removal companies after travelling through a market and reaching the legitimate business agreement that licenses it.
lern2 economix, I'll give you a start
Rule 1 = The invisible hand solves all our problems.
Read this 9001 times and if you still don't understand then kill yourself.
Name:
Anonymous2008-04-26 8:03
If bush wasn't a fucking communist he would privatize air
>>14
I sort of smiled, but not really lol'd >>9 was good because it was original and some work went to it to make it sort of look less retarded and ridiculous. Try again.
You guys, talking about socialism like it's some big conspiracy. Well, here's something for you children to chew on; every family that has children that performs all of the children's necessities is a socialist program. Any one source that controls the responsibilities of one or more individuals is a socialist totalitarian. Shit. Grow the fuck up, would'ja?
>>18
You're not wrong, perhaps slightly askew from and bias. It's the Good vs Evil thing that troubles me. If all humans have the potential for good and evil within them, but are supposed to oppose evil and support good; that would mean that everyone's at WAR with themselves. Shit! That about sums it up right there. Everyone is at war with themselves hense the wars we are in right now even with our girlfriends, boyfriends, brothers, sisters, mothers, fathers, governments, priests, sleazy best friends, prudent friends. It's because we don't see it within ourselves that we don't see it in others. "To Thine Own Self Be True" -William Shakespear
"None are more hopelessly enslaved than those who think they are free." -- Johann Wolfgang von Goethe
>>19
Being evil means being an asshole, so by being an asshole to your "girlfriends, boyfriends, brothers, sisters, mothers, fathers, governments, priests, sleazy best friends, prudent friends" you are in fact doing them a favour? I guess that's why you have no "girlfriend, boyfriend, sleazy best friends, prudent friends".
Ok...let me put it another way. By confronting other people's self-disrespect you invariably show them what they are doing to themselves and to THEM this is known and felt as "Love". By neglecting their attacks or ignoring their self-disrespect you disrespect yourselves and they see this as disgusting. But than again, you would actually have to communicate and cooperate with people to understand this point of view.
Name:
Anonymous2008-04-28 13:26
>>21
I don't think that'll work. People are often more willing to confront someone who is proving them wrong to prove they will not be controlled, even when you have open diplomatic channels. It's best to state clearly, unemotionally and logically what you think and let them make their own decisions, rather than demanding they act a certain way.
This is how drill instructors work, when a cadet won't do something they don't shout "DO IT FAGGOT" over and over, they already know what the order is so there is no point, instead they convince them they are a stupid worthless piece of shit until they follow the order.