Holocaust callout

Hey /politics/, roughly a little over a week ago, I got into a trainwreck of a debate on /n/ regarding the holocaust, and that one archive- containing millions of documents totaling to 16 miles long- was brought up. Which had information on all the various victims of the holocaust. Then, someone brought up an email conversation they had with one of the archivists, asking if there were forensic documents indicating if any of the victims were killed by zyklon-b, which the archivists replied with no.

They still haven't replied to me asking the same thing, but it dawned on me: why the fuck would the germans have autopsies of the people they killed?

I'm posting this because the same guy asked me to post it here, and /n/ is just too much of a shithole, so....

>>5
Well, that's the thing. The Nazis gave a cause of death in every document of every death (Sometimes they did autopsies to determine them, naturally). And we'll find precisely just that. We already know that the alleged number of camp deaths aren't in those files, rather more a number matching what revisionists say happened (check the VHO link above in >>2 for a breakdown per camp), and we know that they cannot tie homicidal gassings to any of the recorded deaths.

Saying that this will shut "Holocaust deniers" up is an argument from (supposed -- because revisionists had researched it for a while until they got barred) ignorance and laughable at best.

The Rudolf Report http://www.vho.org/GB/Books/trr/ already settled it in my opinion, there were no homicidal gassings as alleged at Auschwitz.