"Are Men Necessary?"

http://www.amazon.com/Are-Men-Necessary-Sexes-Collide/dp/042521236X/ref=pd_bbs_sr_1/103-1375341-3772666?ie=UTF8&s=books&qid=1192351868&sr=8-1
Interesting how feminists can get away with writing shit like that while if anyone else wrote a book called "are women necessary" they would basically be lynched. 

Why is it politically correct to portray men & fathers as stupid, worthless, and inept, and at the same time portraying women, mothers, and girls as sensible, intelligent, etc?

Think of some major American TV shows for a second, and think which gender gets portrayed as stupid, inept, weak, or lazy.  How about The Simpsons? Homer Simpson is a total idiot, Bart Simpson is a total idiot, most of the other men in the program are idiots, many of them are fat, lazy, stupid, and get made fun of constantly.  The women in the program? Lisa Simpson, Marge Simpson, and many of the other women in the program are portrayed as intelligent, reasonable, etc.  That isn't the only example, look at other shows too.  The show Everyone Loves Raymond is another example.  The wife is always intelligent and reasonable, and the husband is always stupid and lucky to have her.

Then, as soon as any TV show portrays women or any other group of people or 'minority' negatively, the libfags and politically correct police rush to their assistance. 

Why are you revolting against this shit NOW? Go back to the 60s, or better yet, go further back in time and kill Kike Marx. Otherwise it's not going to stop just because you bitch about it on a text board.

"Then, as soon as any TV show portrays women or any other group of people or 'minority' negatively, the libfags and politically correct police rush to their assistance. "

The funny thing is that men are actually the minority in terms of population.

>>3
Shut up!!!

Wommen would be exterminated if men could have babies.

you could grow a test tube baby in a mans boby then cesarian section it out, neither sex is neccisary thanks to science!

>>6
I'd love to have children but Tom Cruise ate my placenta.

well biologically, women do drive the species.  they're the ones who get to choose.

>>8

Not if we steal their eggs from their ovaries at birth and develop tubes that simulate the uterus.

>>9
That would be an infringement on their liberty. Though I guess to a certain extent those thoughts are due to natural selection, being all honourable and noble has been bred into me so that I am more likely to attract a mate.

>>10

Your beliefs aren't innate, or otherwise the Africoons would be fucking doctors of ethics.

>>11
Perhaps honour and nobility were not requirements in their evolution.

>>2
What does the 60's have to do with the omnipresent anti-man bullshit?

Just tell the feminazi's to get back to the kitchen. Women don't rule the world and they never will.

>>14
It doesn't really look like that statement is accurate, considering Hillary is ahead of Obama by like 33% in national polls, and is neck-in-neck with, and in some polls, SLIGHTLY ahead of Giuliani.  It looks like Hillary WILL BE the next president, no? Her campaign and base of support only seems to grow.

>>15
Fuck yeah!  Time for a woman in the white house! We need REAL change.  Hillary08

"Nobody will ever win the Battle of the Sexes. There's just too much fraternizing with the enemy."
   -- Henry Kissinger

Prove him wrong.

>>15

you know, shes very articulate and seems to have reasonable plans for nearly everything.  Unlike Obama who's running on hope or Giuliani who's running on 9/11

Pat Buchanan speaks the truth:

"The real liberators of American women were not the feminist noise-makers; they were the automobile, the supermarket, the shopping center, the dishwasher, the washer-dryer, the freezer."

>>18
she really isnt, she laughs at EVERY question to give herself longer to think, she voted FOR a law that makes bush able to go to war with iran if he wants and she is being schooled by her husband and is only still with him after he fucked about because she needs his help in the political environment at that level.

of what i have seen only mike gravel seems to know what he is talking about, which is sad because he has no chance of winning

>>18
"reasonable plans" - epic lulz

her plans keeping changing depending on who she's talking to

$5,000 per newborn, dropped
$1,000 in government-sponsored IRAs, probably will fail
pull out of Iraq immediately!
no, we can't do it just yet!
immediately!
within a few months!
immediately!

>>20
>>21

you're right, better vote republican lol

>>19
What about the vibrator?

>>23
Women don't experience sexual pleasure, they just pretend they do to make men feel inadequate.

Back to OP. You CAN write a book saying women are totally fucking useless, but it won't get published. The book in OP was only published because women will buy it. As >>3 said, there are more women than men. Nobody's gonna buy a book entitled "Are Women Necessary." I think it has nothing to do with people getting upset about it. Freedom of speech is real, but our society is run on money, and no money is made from chauvinist ideals anymore.

>>12
>>11
Um, actually generally speaking African culture is more "ethical" in the sense that they are less geared toward selfish individualism and more geared towards selfish collectivism. This actually because their pre-culture was based around the important of the woman or the "mother-figure".

>>26
It still is in a sense(I am using African Americans in this example).  There is a complete absence male leadership in any sense within the typical african american family unit(usually a mother and x amount of kids).

>>26
Not working though is it.

>>27

I don't think this is a fair comparison because the "Africans" in question are distinctly American in a cultural sense. There is no biological and genetic elements in culture.

Secondly, in African culture the complete opposite is true. Even without a biological father, the culture is gear toward mother figures and the collective being responsible for the individual because he or she is apart of the greater whole.

>>28

Nothing is really "working". It's about survivability. This notion that any culture is doing better than the other is kinda silly in the sense that each seem to be so different with their own problems. You claiming that there is a western solution to the problems of the east is pretty narrowminded.

>>29
It is logical that you think we have something to learn from African cultures and I never said otherwise, what is illogical is that you think Africans have nothing to learn from us or that there is no reason for them to change their culture. Cultures are just a collection of ideas, I believe they should be judged and used objectively and thus unlike you I am unbiased when it comes to culture, I do not care whether an idea comes from Africa or the west I judge it by it's merits.

People in Africa don't care who invented the cure for malaria or the concept of natural law, they care about curing malaria and ending the violence. I'm sorry if the idea that Africans are benefitting from ideas which came from white people offends you somehow, you will just have to stop believing that racism against whites is not racism.

>>30

I think my reply to >>28 invalidates your characterization of the statements I made. Obviously Africans can and does (somewhat) benefit from the west, but the reality to as if they are benefiting to the fullest extent is questionable to say the least.

Alot of people love to blame this on the Africans themselves, but I can't help but think objectively that our interference doesn't and didn't always do good. Especially when we westerners seem to come from a culture where taking advantage of others in the name of individualism is a staple behavior.

All I said was that eastern problems do not necessitate western solutions. The perception of a "better culture" is inherently biased. In the end, I still think that overall- as far as the human race is concerned- "Nothing is working."

>>31
lol, "somewhat."  Where would they be WITHOUT the west? Sitting in some fly and horse shit infested mud hut in Africa somewhere?

>>32

They are still sitting in horse-shit infested mud huts. The majority of those who are not are the vastly disproportionate wealthy. Considering we aren't even 30 years away from the South African apartheid, I'd tread very carefully when discussing all the things the west "gave Africa".

Like I said, cognitive dissonance is a product of willful ignorance perpetuated in a culture where fucking people over in the name of individualism and self-benefit is the status quo.

You tell me what feels worse. Fucking someone over. Or The guilt from fucking someone over. Tell me what you'd rather feel. You think western culture is better so even when we're obviously taking, we repeat to ourselves that we're "giving" or "saving" and then we have the audacity to claim that those we've used as stepping stones just "didn't have what it takes genetically or culturally" to use the so-called gift we've given "properly".

I used to think that way, but not anymore. What the west has "given Africa" clearly came at a price that the Africans couldn't afford and the World Bank is doing a pretty good job of making sure that remains the case.

>>31
These 2 quotes led me to believe you have something against the west.
"African culture is more "ethical" in the sense that they are less geared toward selfish individualism and more geared towards selfish collectivism"

"This notion that any culture is doing better than the other is kinda silly in the sense that each seem to be so different with their own problems"

Firstly these 2 quotes are contradictory, if cultures have different problems, then one system of ethics would not work in another and thus you cannot judge whether one culture has a superior system of ethics or not. This is a double standard in opposition to the transfer of culture from the west to africa regardless of what it is specifically.

Secondly as I explained only the environment cannot be changed socially, culture can be changed and there is nothing wrong with this so there is no reason why elements of western culture cannot be beneficial to Africans purely because they came from another culture.

Thirdly the claim that Africans have superior ethics was poor as there was no explanations as to why a collectivist culture based on mother figures has superior ethics. This is excessive hyperbole indeed when you neglect to even explain your reasonning.

I know I'm being mean, but that's why I characterized your statements.

>>34

I put ethical in quotes to denote my own lack of belief that any one culture is absolutely more ethical than the other. You need to read >>33 and start paying more attention before you make anymore lame attempts at pigeonholing your opposition.

>>35
So you admit that you are incapable of explaining yourself properly. You have yet to confess to the 2nd and 3rd charges of anti-white racism.

life is about the survival of the fittest, we were more technologically advanced in the west, thus you could assume we were better at using our brains - the superior race, be it humans or just western whites, has the right to do as they please on this planet, either help everyone else or exterminate them

>>36

I put ethical in quotes to denote the subjectivity of the word in the context of this discussion. My response to the so-called "charges" is in >>33. I'll be waiting for more of that cognitive dissonance your going to no doubt serve up as "white enlightenment".

>>37

This was addressed in >>33. If you white nationalist guys are going to troll every thread, at least show us that you can comprehend what you're trolling. Trolling doesn't work when you have the comprehension of a 2nd Grader.

The entire book is written by a butthurt woman, who was probably abused/raped by a man, and now has penis envy and whines constantly. But then again, isn't that every feminist nowadays?

>>38
Simply explaining what you meant would have been much easier than putting "ethics" in quotes. Also this still have no bearing on the 2nd and 3rd charges.

>>40

Don't blame me because you don't understand context. I shouldn't have to explain the use of quotes to you. What "School" did you "go to"?

Secondly, I'm not on trial, shitslick. Your pathetic limp-dicked and delusional accusations were addressed in >>33. Either you can dissect and find an adequate retort for my general thesis or you can't.

With all your pathetic flailing, I'm assuming that you're having a difficult time coming to grips with your undeniable faggotry.

Regards,
"Anti-White Anon" <==== Quotations faggot. Do you know them?

>>41
If you noticed I accepted your admission that you made a mistake in relation to my first accusation and were not being racist. I am not being unreasonable. However the second and third charges still stand.

>>42

>>41, here.

What the fuck are you on about? Are you going to reply to >>33, or not?

>>43
Here's how this works. One person make a statement and someone links to it like I've just done to >>43 (you), and this repeats. I am not >>32. I'm not here to argue whether blacks are genetically inferior or not, I already have the solution to that and it's called meritocracy, self-determination and social darwinism which decidedly do not discriminate based on race.