"Are Men Necessary?"

http://www.amazon.com/Are-Men-Necessary-Sexes-Collide/dp/042521236X/ref=pd_bbs_sr_1/103-1375341-3772666?ie=UTF8&s=books&qid=1192351868&sr=8-1
Interesting how feminists can get away with writing shit like that while if anyone else wrote a book called "are women necessary" they would basically be lynched. 

Why is it politically correct to portray men & fathers as stupid, worthless, and inept, and at the same time portraying women, mothers, and girls as sensible, intelligent, etc?

Think of some major American TV shows for a second, and think which gender gets portrayed as stupid, inept, weak, or lazy.  How about The Simpsons? Homer Simpson is a total idiot, Bart Simpson is a total idiot, most of the other men in the program are idiots, many of them are fat, lazy, stupid, and get made fun of constantly.  The women in the program? Lisa Simpson, Marge Simpson, and many of the other women in the program are portrayed as intelligent, reasonable, etc.  That isn't the only example, look at other shows too.  The show Everyone Loves Raymond is another example.  The wife is always intelligent and reasonable, and the husband is always stupid and lucky to have her.

Then, as soon as any TV show portrays women or any other group of people or 'minority' negatively, the libfags and politically correct police rush to their assistance. 

>>32

They are still sitting in horse-shit infested mud huts. The majority of those who are not are the vastly disproportionate wealthy. Considering we aren't even 30 years away from the South African apartheid, I'd tread very carefully when discussing all the things the west "gave Africa".

Like I said, cognitive dissonance is a product of willful ignorance perpetuated in a culture where fucking people over in the name of individualism and self-benefit is the status quo.

You tell me what feels worse. Fucking someone over. Or The guilt from fucking someone over. Tell me what you'd rather feel. You think western culture is better so even when we're obviously taking, we repeat to ourselves that we're "giving" or "saving" and then we have the audacity to claim that those we've used as stepping stones just "didn't have what it takes genetically or culturally" to use the so-called gift we've given "properly".

I used to think that way, but not anymore. What the west has "given Africa" clearly came at a price that the Africans couldn't afford and the World Bank is doing a pretty good job of making sure that remains the case.