Castro Provides Endorsement for 2008

http://www.reuters.com/article/topNews/idUSN2825114320070828
ROFL

"The unfettered free market has been the most radically destructive force in American life in the last generation."

 - Hillary Clinton on C-Span in 1996

Wtf? This coming from a guy who ass fucks his own people, if he wants the USA to head towards communism he might aswell support Bush and give him a bad name.

Fuck yeah, Castro!

Castro '08

You know, Clinton is right. The uncontrolled Free Market championed by Mass Murderer Ronald Reagan and the Bush family has fucked over so many people.

>>4
Socialist nanny states are a lot worse.

>>5
Ah, I see we've got a Libertarian here, then? Socialist states actually care for their people, rather than leave them to die out on the streets like Capitalist fatcat governments do.

>>6
Socialist states fuck the middle classes and give the wealth to useless first generation spics. Any non-worthless person can find a job and get ahead.

And yeah, I'm all for letting the blacks and spics live out "gangsta's paradise" without getting my money.

>>7
What the hell are you talking about? Socialist states distribute the wealth to the poor and middle class and take it from the rich, for the most part.

>>Any non-worthless person can find a job

So are you telling me someone from Compton and someone from Philadelphia have the same chances of getting ahead in the Capitalist system? Someone who's poor and Black in a society that discriminates against blacks has the same chance of getting a job as a rich white man?

>>6
Hmm.  I live in the USA, and I have yet to come across any people out on the street in the areas in which I live.  Maybe that's because the areas I live in support sensible (conservative) economic policies that are pro-growth and don't stifle business and employment opportunities for the people in the name of promoting big-government and zero accountability?

>>8
No, there's barely any evidence of discrimination it's a made up fantasy by liberals. The only discrimination these days is anti-White in the name of Affirmative Action. Blacks just have low IQs, meaning they can never get good jobs. They are lazy, and can't even show up to work on time.

>>9
Stifle business? Is that all you Conservatives care about? By stifling business, I assume you mean not making them comply with Labor Laws which protect workers from exploitation and not making them comply with Environmental Protection laws that protect the entire human race from the greedy bastards that own the business' from killing the planet.

Stifling business to protect our citizens is much more important than the precious money you Republifags seem to worship so much.

Socialist fags only hate Ronald Reagan for toppling the soviet union.

>>12
Ronald Reagan was a mass murderer and a racist. The Soviet Union sucked anyway, so most Socialistfags like myself hated both equally.

>>13
Reagan was a liberal so what are you? A marxist?

>>14
Reagan was a Conservative, dumbass.

I'm a Social Capitalist. Basically, I think Capitalism works, and it's the only thing that will, but I also believe in helping people out with Social programs such as Universal Healthcare, etc.

>>13
Truth. Anyone who is on our side in a war is a mass murderer and anyone who isn't a liberal is a racist though if they are a white liberal they are still subconsciously racist.

>>15
Why not put the 2 together and privatise social programs?

>>15
Vote Ron Paul.

>>16
Ronald Reagan voted against every Civil Rights bill and vetoed them all of the time while in office. He also voted against Equal Ballot Access laws.

He was a racist, hate to tell you, Reaganfag.

>>19
No he didn't. The household income of ethnic minorities increased more than the average white household income. In the media and business old racial epithets disappeared and were considerred un-commercial. These frictions went because Reagan didn't take sides and simply treated ethnic minorities as he would any non-disabled white male aged 35+.

lol another libfag bitching about reagan. 
rofl reagan pwns the libfags:
http://fisher.lib.virginia.edu/collections/stats/elections/maps/1980ec.gif
http://www.republicanvoices.org/map1984.jpg

Reagan:  gg 2ez bitches

Okay, let's have a fun scenario here.

So there's a guy who comes from a working-class family. No members of his family had ever gone to college or had dropped out of college. However, the guy works hard, attends college for a degree in engineering, and graduates at the top of his class.
He works his way up the corporate ladder for years, working long hours and sacrificing his free time. Eventually he gains the position of VP at a successful company. However, he can't enjoy the wealth that comes from this because he's too busy supporting lazy welfare queens and baby factories with the heavy taxes he's forced to pay just because he worked harder than everyone else.

About 3% of millionaires inherited their money, while a much larger percentage of people on welfare are able to work but choose not to because they ride off the money of people who work hard. People who live off of the taxes of the rich are nothing but losers, and their cushion of money should be taken away so they can get off their asses and actually work for their food.

Hillary Clinton is right.  The market has been particularly destructive with regard to women's rights.  The market has failed to provide adequate health care and childcare for women who want to enter the workforce.

>>22

even if he had to pay 50% tax he would be able to enjoy his wealth. Unless having less wealth makes him enjoy his existing wealth less?

>>24
Because the faggots his cash goes to didn't earn it and most of them wouldn't suffer without it (they'd spend their free time working instead). Maybe starving orphans and war veterans should get welfare but getting paid for being unemployed is fucking retarded.

>>1
see, I don't see what's so bad about that statement... an unfettered free market is very bad for all but the top 1-2%.  I know none of y'all are in that bracket so you get fucked into being poorer and poorer and complain when someone tries to help.  fucking stupid.

>>26
ALmost nobody is getting "poorer and poorer." I think someone's been watching a little too many Michael Moore movies lately. 

In terms of real income, the bottom 90% of the income earners have been going down quite substantially for at least the past fourteen years. Of course, due to inflation, most people's de jure incomes have actually been rising, but their purchasing power has been decreasing.