If I understand this correctly...

http://www.sbglw.com/index.html

For most part, this web page makes sense.

Except this: "A Teenager Speaks Out Against Pornography
My guest was Justin Berry, who was introduced to the world of pornography in his bedroom using his own webcam. After sinking into a world of drugs and illicit sex, he finally broke away and is now appearing around the country to parents groups, law enforcement officials and child advocates speaking out about what a serious problem pornography is and how dangerous the Internet is. He recently appeared on OPRAH and has also been on The Today Show and Good Morning America.
Click To Listen This link will take you to Kathleen Brooks website -Ethical Life-"

So, according to them, if I understand this correctly, viewing pornography and nudity like the Sistine Chapel on the internet harms children.

Fucking leftist censorship happy cunts.

>>2
I thought that was the religious right.

nope its the pussy left

>>3
I thought that was the religious left. That was a bit of oxymoron, since modern leftism is a full-fledged religion.
Conservatives do not want any censorship, that goes against their definition of what they're trying to 'conserve.' Also, Conservatives != religious. Most people that vote Conservative (even the new post-ww2 ones -- except the neoconservatives) do it because Democrats are way worse. Religious right is just a smear term.

>>5
'Religious right' is a well deserved smear. They're hindering science based on their misunderstandings of a book.

>>5
Get out, Ann Coulter

>>6
They're hindering science based on their misunderstandings of a book.
No they aren't. And the neoconservatives fall out of the equation, since they are by definition through their oxymoronic term not conservatives.
Don't even let me start on how leftism misrepresents and hinders anything that doesn't fit through their ideology in science, such as race.
>>7
I hate that neocon bitch. I admit I liked one or two articles of her bashing illegal immigration, but I hate her.

What is central to this is the kid took it too far and that what he took to far used responsibly isn't bad.

This is not a left/right debate unless you think of it in terms of the role authoritarianism has in determining your media.