If I understand this correctly...

http://www.sbglw.com/index.html

For most part, this web page makes sense.

Except this: "A Teenager Speaks Out Against Pornography
My guest was Justin Berry, who was introduced to the world of pornography in his bedroom using his own webcam. After sinking into a world of drugs and illicit sex, he finally broke away and is now appearing around the country to parents groups, law enforcement officials and child advocates speaking out about what a serious problem pornography is and how dangerous the Internet is. He recently appeared on OPRAH and has also been on The Today Show and Good Morning America.
Click To Listen This link will take you to Kathleen Brooks website -Ethical Life-"

So, according to them, if I understand this correctly, viewing pornography and nudity like the Sistine Chapel on the internet harms children.

>>3
I thought that was the religious left. That was a bit of oxymoron, since modern leftism is a full-fledged religion.
Conservatives do not want any censorship, that goes against their definition of what they're trying to 'conserve.' Also, Conservatives != religious. Most people that vote Conservative (even the new post-ww2 ones -- except the neoconservatives) do it because Democrats are way worse. Religious right is just a smear term.