Proof niggers are dumb (IQ, brain size etc)

Oriental populations in East Asia and North America typically have mean IQs falling between 101 to 111. White populations in Europe, South Africa, Australasia, and North America have mean IQs of from 85 to 115, with an overall mean of 100. Black populations living south of the Sahara, in the Caribbean, in Britain, and in North America, average IQs of from 70 to 90.

Especially contentious was Lynn's calculation of a mean IQ of only 70 for Black Africans living south of the Sahara. Many reviewers have expressed skepticism about such a low IQ, holding it impossible that, by European standards, 50 percent of Black Africa is 'mentally retarded'. But a mean African IQ of 70 has been confirmed in three studies since Lynn's review, each of which used Raven's Progressive Matrices, a test regarded as an excellent measure of the non-verbal component of general intelligence and one not bound by culturally specific information.

>>125
>>126

I obviously mean modern leftism, spawned by the Frankfurt school. Anyone with half a brain can understand that.

I don't give a shit what you mean or what you think you mean, cockbrain. I'm going by what was implictly stated within your posts.

Modern Western science is, to an unacceptable extent, a political propaganda.

And this convientantly excludes any of flakey methodology or "faux-research" (Correlation is Causatation LULZ) used to prop up your antiquated world views?

This is clear both in genetics and in psychology, fields revealing unbridgeable racial differences that must be covered for the sake of current dominant ideology. Scientists, who don't have an unshakable scientific reputation, rather don't risk any affiliation with these findings, otherwise they could lose their job. They thus rather swim with the current, as it is usual in history.

Yeah, yeah, yeah. This is just like when black people scream: "The man is keeping me down." It's sad and shows a lack of responsibility for your own ignorance. The truth is pretty clean cut and like I said, the world is far too connected and complicated (and FREE!) now to politically express your views the way you desire. Whites are never going to have their own land to themselves, people are going to still be treated on merit, etc. If you don't like it, leave the west.

If you are so nervous that racial classification may contain inaccuracies, then we can abolish all classifications in all animals. The traditional racial classification in humans was not artificial, but stemmed from genetic differences that were now largely confirmed by population genetics.

We are not mere animals and population genetic sample a mere continuum. They hold no bearing on how to treat or classify individuals within a general population.

What the fuck are you on about with White Nationalism, big government and socialism? What enactment of *my* so called illogical and unrealistic beliefs? You're the fucking idiots who push for a dysgenic nanny state, not I. What's unrealistic about it? Why do you talk about Nazism and the so called 'burning of the Jews?' (Of course it's a rhetorical question, since I know why -- instead of dealing with the leftist roots of race denial in academia, you rant about Nazis) Their corruption, I lol'ed. What corruption? I don't think they had much of that, but then again, I don't have the necessary Pravda sources to prove it. Protip: I'm mostly a libertarian. I hate big government.

What don't you elucidate on how you would like your current beliefs to be politically expressed then? Because alot of the data presented here is regurgitated from Nazi-era german science. Also, it's common fact that Hitler took Germany by force and ultra-socialist ideology. "Night of the Long Knives" mean anything to you? Any where are you getting my desire for a "nanny state" from? I'm pretty much an modern anarchist (Libertarianism is for pussies) so I'd like to see what correlation (lulz@1!!) you're going to draw here. 

>>126

Human race and species are interchangable and me making such a state does not mean that I don't see race as a potential classifier. It's an irrelevant classification, but still a classification nonetheless.


I SAID: "It seems that way to someone with such simple thinking, but the truth is...if evolution is manifesting itself it isn't in the form of race.

YOU SAID: "Your opinion, you are entitled to it. Enjoy your freedom to be a retard.

I SAID: "This would make evolution and very weak force in the genetic adaptability of mankind if this were truly the case.

YOU SAID: "Because you say so? Obviously."

I SAID: "The opposite. I think there are more of racial classes and sub-classes and history has shown us that it was only the last few hundred years where we great over-generalized race. "Whites" and "Blacks" and "Asians" are huge, huge, HUGE over-simplifications for what is going on genetically."

YOU SAID: "NOPE! NOPE! I'M A BIG FAG.

FINALLY: Feel free to rebuff any of my conjectures using hard data. Humanity's strength comes for genetic diversity. If one race "won out" (whatever that means) above all others and were the only ones left- we'd die out and become as incapable of surviving in our environment as the Ashkanazi Jew. (As sickly as they are). The samples of the greater genetic continnum we use to deter certain races is politically used by the left and the right. "Whites" didn't exist as "one genetic race" until the 16 hundred when no hard science was done to determine so. All this shit is common knowledge. I'm done with this discussion for now. You need google in your life, seriously.