Proof niggers are dumb (IQ, brain size etc)

Oriental populations in East Asia and North America typically have mean IQs falling between 101 to 111. White populations in Europe, South Africa, Australasia, and North America have mean IQs of from 85 to 115, with an overall mean of 100. Black populations living south of the Sahara, in the Caribbean, in Britain, and in North America, average IQs of from 70 to 90.

Especially contentious was Lynn's calculation of a mean IQ of only 70 for Black Africans living south of the Sahara. Many reviewers have expressed skepticism about such a low IQ, holding it impossible that, by European standards, 50 percent of Black Africa is 'mentally retarded'. But a mean African IQ of 70 has been confirmed in three studies since Lynn's review, each of which used Raven's Progressive Matrices, a test regarded as an excellent measure of the non-verbal component of general intelligence and one not bound by culturally specific information.

>>124

Also, what's with comments such as the 'human race'? What's that? Do you realise that If you don't cease with retarded leftist speech, I'll call on it. What's so hard to understand? Call it 'human species' or GTFO. 
It seems that way to someone with such simple thinking, but the truth is...if evolution is manifesting itself it isn't in the form of race.
Your opinion, you are entitled to it. Enjoy your freedom to be a retard.
This would make evolution and very weak force in the genetic adaptability of mankind if this were truly the case.
Because you say so? Obviously.
This is one reason why alot of scientists say that your "race biology" is pseudo-science.
Political correctness. Also, there are many that are starting to back away from race denial, especially with new evidence proving it every day, especially since recently. Regardless, I had proven my points in my replies to you.
http://www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/articlerender.fcgi?artid=139378
Read this and weep. They acknowledge race.
The implications of The Bell Curve spell doom for all of mankind.
For your worldview, yes. I'm sorry.
Secondly, I'm not questioning the existence of race.
Why are you acting retarded, why did you say 'human race' etc. then?
Why did you say:
This is one reason why alot of scientists say that your "race biology" is pseudo-science.
then?
Flip flopping around the issue with contradictory statements, nice. Either that or you don't believe in science.
I'm questioning it's social, biological and political relevance.
As you well know by now, it's quite high, due to the heritability described in my second response post.
I'm questioning its overall relevance to intelligence, seeing as how intelligence fundamentally has no a priori definition.
Keep pretending to ignore it.
While "G" may show correlation to intelligence and success...so do alot of other factors. It doesn't show causation. Which, really is all that fucking matter here.
It's 'g' and it does show correlation and that's enough. Get a fucking clue.
BAAAAAAWWWWWWWWWW it doesn't matter.
It fucking matters.
Nevermind the fact that we still aren't exactly certain what "G" is in an a priori sense of the word.
Read some books/articles about 'g' then, or at least what's described in studies and the Wikipedia article on it. Your ignorance is not my problem, not that I did not expect it.
As for how much difference these admixtures make...well I suppose that more depends who's asking and who's answering, doesn't it?
What? No, it depends on genealogical DNA tests.
I don't want the abolition of racial classification.
But you said that
This is one reason why alot of scientists say that your "race biology" is pseudo-science.
The opposite. I think there are more of racial classes and sub-classes and history has shown us that it was only the last few hundred years where we great over-generalized race.
You think is a good word. If you stated it as any other than an opinion I would have to call you a moron.
"Whites" and "Blacks" and "Asians" are huge, huge, HUGE over-simplifications for what is going on genetically.
Nope.
The only reason this generalization is still taking place is for political reasons, liberal and conservative.
If science and truth REALLY had it's way then there would many more classifications of race.
Not the just arbitrary five or six that's has been doled out by our "masters".
You're delusional.

The Bell Curve

See my earlier posts. The book was not debunked in any way. Just because angry leftists whine and cry, doesn't mean the data or conclusions get disproved. Also, see response No.2. Same fallacy used again. Thirdly, we are talking about the socio-economic data I used. Where has there even been an attempted rebuttal of that? I see the conclusions being questioned, not the data itself which was never challenged. Fail. This shows you're a de facto fucking idiot.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Race_and_intelligence (THE ARGUMENT NEVER FUCKING ENDS)
BAWWWWWWWWW, so doesn't Atheism v Christianity et al.
The argument never ends only in the deranged mind of the leftist. Again, see my earlier response post. Also, Wikipedia tends to paint 'facts' from a leftist perspective. It is heritable, determined genetically and hard to change unless you have problems such as malnutrition, illiteracy... Do you dispute that or not? If so, let me see your data.

http://hmg.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/full/15/12/2025
Yeah, so? Two gene variants previously implicated in the evolution of human brain size apparently don't influence brain volumes in people today. How is that related to what I say? I assume you took this link from Wikipedia. Did you bother to read it, or if you did, did you understand it or not?

tl;dr You're fucking clueless, you haven't rebutted a thing I said, all the things you restated here are already answered in my two part response to you, and this post is essentially content-less. You are right, you ARE trolling me. Thanks for the early warning I guess. Protip to myself: I should have just linked my 2 earlier response posts again.