[quote]D'oh. Your point being? Are you saying every haplotype should constitute a different race? What the fuck? No one has ever claimed that a haplotype = a race. LOL. You have absolutely no clue what you're talking about do you? There are (to my knowledge at least) 153 haplogroups and thus much more haplotypes.[/quote]
Many have claimed that certain groupings of specific haplotypes are ground for sub-grouping the entire human genome along racial lines. This is a false assumption based on suppositions made before any relevant scientific study was attempted.
Alright, I'm going to wrap this up really quickly here.
1.
Anything you've written about leftists, Marxism and the like.
Accusing the opposition as being "leftists" is a tactic ranking right up there with McCarthyism in it's stupidity and inherent faggotry. Except that white nationalists have used this cop out since before the red scare, while seemingly ignoring the fact that in order to enact or express the political implications of your illogical and unrealistic beliefs you will basically *have* to give way to big government and socialism. Let's not forget that Nazi-era Germany (before the "burning of the jews") was not only fascist and corrupt but staunchly socialist. Any reference to your opposition being "lefties" who can't "face the reality of race" is instant fail.
I can tell you first hand that those in control of this country are never going to give you what you think you want because it would be literally setting sail for fail for the entire human race. All races and genders. Genetically, Socially, Politically. I can pretty much promise you that even if you somehow gathered concrete proof- it would mean fuck all to anyone with enough power to control the masses.
2. [quote]You seem to discard evolution and think that haplotype/haplogroup diversity proves racial mixing -- showing that you have no clue of what they are. Protip: It's supposed to be this way. Or you think that alien haplogroup variation prove significant racial mixing? But that goes against your saying that there aren't any races. You're not fooling anyone intelligent with your neo-Marxist sophistry used for the fooling of uneducated masses. Does a few percent admixture make any significant difference and is sufficient for the abolition of the racial classification? No. In fact, saying people are in the slight racially mixed just further proves races. And let's give a bigger example. Does 20% white admixture in American blacks make them indistinguishable from white Americans -- both in appearance and social statistics? No.[/quote]
It seems that way to someone with such simple thinking, but the truth is...if evolution is manifesting itself it isn't in the form of race. This would make evolution and very weak force in the genetic adaptability of mankind if this were truly the case. This is one reason why alot of scientists say that your "race biology" is pseudo-science. The implications of The Bell Curve spell doom for all of mankind.
Secondly, I'm not questioning the existence of race. I'm questioning it's social, biological and political relevance. I'm questioning its overall relevance to intelligence, seeing as how intelligence fundamentally has no a priori definition. While "G" may show correlation to intelligence and success...so do alot of other factors. It doesn't show causation. Which, really is all that fucking matter here. Nevermind the fact that we still aren't exactly certain what "G" is in an a priori sense of the word.
As for how much difference these admixtures make...well I suppose that more depends who's asking and who's answering, doesn't it? I don't want the abolition of racial classification. The opposite. I think there are more of racial classes and sub-classes and history has shown us that it was only the last few hundred years where we great over-generalized race. "Whites" and "Blacks" and "Asians" are huge, huge, HUGE over-simplifications for what is going on genetically. The only reason this generalization is still taking place is for political reasons, liberal and conservative. If science and truth REALLY had it's way then there would many more classifications of race. Not the just arbitrary five or six that's has been doled out by our "masters".
Ok, now this where I'm done. The rebuttals to the rest of your posts can be found at the following links:
The Bell Curve
http://atrios.blogspot.com/2003/02/even-more-bell-curve.html
http://www.slate.com/?id=2416
Race and Intelligence
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Race_and_intelligence (THE ARGUMENT NEVER FUCKING ENDS)
http://hmg.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/full/15/12/2025