>>124
Many have claimed that certain groupings of specific haplotypes are ground for sub-grouping the entire human genome along racial lines. This is a false assumption based on suppositions made before any relevant scientific study was attempted.
http://genetics.plosjournals.org/archive/1553-7404/3/9/pdf/10.1371_journal.pgen.0030160-L.pdf
http://genetics.plosjournals.org/archive/1553-7404/1/6/pdf/10.1371_journal.pgen.0010070-S.pdf
I had already talked about it in the parts that you didn't quote in my first response post. It goes along very nicely. It is *your* false assumption if you think that no relevant study was ever attempted.
The traditional division of human races clearly corresponds with haplogroups. The Europid race makes up a distinct lineage, both from the paternal (F) and maternal (N) side, that originated in the Near East 45 000 years ago. Europeans are actually a special sub-race, because they are composed of three F-subbranches (R1a1, R1b, I) that were isolated from the rest of mankind for 20 000 years and are mutually connected by maternal lineages.
The groups traditionally classified as "Australoids" could be taken as separate races, because they separated from each other as early as 50-60 000 years ago. Again, they make up a distinct lineage (Y-haplogroup C, mtDNA haplogroup M).
The Mongoloid race is actually a racial mixture stabilized between 30-10 000 years ago in the Far East from two (Paleo)europid (N, O) and one Australoid (C3) lineage, whereas the C3 lineage was probably the original source of the phenotype.
American Indians should be taken as a separate race. Their traditional grouping with Mongolids is very dubious; they actually come from a Central Asian Q-lineage closely related to European Cro-Magnons (R1) that dwelled around the Altai mountains up to 20 000 B.P. Then a part of them headed north-east and took some Mongolid women during the way to America. Here they stayed largely isolated for at least 15 000 years. The remaining Q-people in Asia are today's Kets, Yukaghirs, Nivkhi and Selkups (albeit heavily mixed with N-Mongolids).
Already told you about Sub-Saharan Africa.
The original haplogroups of Ainu consist of a male lineage D and a female lineage Y. The male lineage D belongs to the M-168 group of (mostly) non-African haplogroups E, D, F, C that started to expand from Africa 60-70 000 years ago to Eurasia. D was probably the last one of them that left Africa. It is not anyhow closely related to the "Australoid" lineage C, but rather to the Y-haplogroup E that stayed in Africa. However, it is true that D went the same way like C (along the South-Asian coast). Curiously, it is also present in the Andamanese, some Central Asian nations and in Tibetans.
As for mtDNA haplogroup Y, it is, technically speaking, of Europoid origin, because it belongs to the predominantly Europid mtDNA macrohaplogroup N. How it actually got to East Asia, I don't know so far. It could be brought there by N/O-men 30 000 years ago from Central Asia, but it is not closely related to any mtDNA haplogroup that is currently tied with the presence of N and O in East Asia. As far as I know, it belongs to N9-lineage that also occurs in China, Tibet and in Altaians and Nivkhi. Since D is also present in the same regions, the N9 lineage was very probably an old maternal lineage of the Proto-Ainu, who crystalized somewhere in Northern China/Amur region, where the diversity of this mtDNA haplogroup is the highest.
1. Anything you've written about leftists, Marxism and the like.
Accusing the opposition as being "leftists" is a tactic ranking right up there with McCarthyism in it's stupidity and inherent faggotry. Except that white nationalists have used this cop out since before the red scare, while seemingly ignoring the fact that in order to enact or express the political implications of your illogical and unrealistic beliefs you will basically *have* to give way to big government and socialism. Let's not forget that Nazi-era Germany (before the "burning of the jews") was not only fascist and corrupt but staunchly socialist. Any reference to your opposition being "lefties" who can't "face the reality of race" is instant fail.
I can tell you first hand that those in control of this country are never going to give you what you think you want because it would be literally setting sail for fail for the entire human race. All races and genders. Genetically, Socially, Politically. I can pretty much promise you that even if you somehow gathered concrete proof- it would mean fuck all to anyone with enough power to control the masses.
I obviously mean modern leftism, spawned by the Frankfurt school. Anyone with half a brain can understand that.
The abolition of traditional racial classification has clearly (Neo-)Marxist political background and was motivated by perceived unsolvable interracial conflicts and social inequalities in many Western states. Hence it eventually turned out that it would be better to pretend that there exist no races at all. Modern Western science is, to an unacceptable extent, a political propaganda. This is clear both in genetics and in psychology, fields revealing unbridgeable racial differences that must be covered for the sake of current dominant ideology. Scientists, who don't have an unshakable scientific reputation, rather don't risk any affiliation with these findings, otherwise they could lose their job. They thus rather swim with the current, as it is usual in history.
If you are so nervous that racial classification may contain inaccuracies, then we can abolish all classifications in all animals. The traditional racial classification in humans was not artificial, but stemmed from genetic differences that were now largely confirmed by population genetics.
What the fuck are you on about with White Nationalism, big government and socialism? What enactment of *my* so called illogical and unrealistic beliefs? You're the fucking idiots who push for a dysgenic nanny state, not I. What's unrealistic about it? Why do you talk about Nazism and the so called 'burning of the Jews?' (Of course it's a rhetorical question, since I know why -- instead of dealing with the leftist roots of race denial in academia, you rant about Nazis) Their corruption, I lol'ed. What corruption? I don't think they had much of that, but then again, I don't have the necessary Pravda sources to prove it. Protip: I'm mostly a libertarian. I hate big government.
Any reference to your opposition being "lefties" who can't "face the reality of race" is instant fail.
Actually, it isn't. It's highly accurate.
Then you go rant about what I supposedly want. LOL. What the fuck? Where is your so called rebuttal of the implications of leftists, Marxism and the like? It's just like the rest of this post, pure drivel.