What is it with Black men and White women?

What happened to Black pride? Get your head our of your ass and date a nice African-American women, son.

geh, forgot to quotd >>36 XP

>>38

RedCream, mai boi...Kevin Pierria uses "PWNED" and the only thing he's got "PWNED" is the market on mediocrity and shit. You see, regardless of what reasons inter-racial couples might hypothetically enter into a relationship...it is still wrong to assume problems such as abuse stem solely from race and this assumption that it does stems from pre-existent racial thought.

The reasons for a black man thinking of a white woman as a trophy or a white women dating a black man to piss her father off are only true because they are culturally and socially expressed. It's not "FROM WITHIN" when you're responding to the prevalent opinions of a racially obsessive culture who have based those opinions on the the very thing you've based yours on - fallacy and ignorance.

It's cute that you keep pretending your view runs opposed to the negative impact of Hyperliberalism's inability to discuss race. But you are just as bad as they are because of your inability to discuss it without resorting to anecdotes, fallacy and as clearly shown in >>36 - thinly veiled bigotry.

>>40

That would be fine if that were the case, but as >>36 has already pointed out. RedCream didn't start in on the Hyperliberalism stuff until >>21. AFTER he had been called out to support his view with something other than heresy and anecdotes. Considering that he has refused to address this is highly dubious and has all the argumentative evasiveness of a Dick Cheney interview. 

The only way you can still think the way you do about his view point is if you completely ignore posts >>2, >>5, >>15, >>21. This would a different matter entirely if it weren't for those statements. Sorry, but it seems you're on the Failboat right along with RedCream and unfortunately for you it's sinking under the weight of it's own semen and compacted feces.

>>42 haha, okay, if thats what you say. However, I was not supporting his beliefs, it just seemed like I should point out a few things. Personally, I think interracial relationships can be great, but often are, for one reason or another, taken the wrong way. It depends on the social and familiar impact, and how said couple reacts. In the case that said couple can predict what may happen with external affairs, then you have the cases where one or both parties will initiate a relationship for the desired

>>43 (cont.) effect. In other cases, they could have their own selfish cause, such as the trophy white girl mentioned earlier That does not, however, mean that ALL interracial couples are there for the wrong reason. Simply put, there's another side of the duct tape that runs paralell to the one that sticks.

>>42
Like I said before, as long as you admit that interracial couples could have racial reasons for getting together, then my point is made.  Of course, anecdotally, I hardly doubted that in the first place.  The difference being promoted by Your Dumb Side is that -- as I predicted -- Hyperliberalism demands that you place any and all blame for their foibles upon SOCIETY, to wit:

"The reasons for a black man thinking of a white woman as a trophy or a white women dating a black man to piss her father off are only true because they are culturally and socially expressed."

Game.  Set.  Match.  While laboring under this Hyperliberal indoctrination, you're not even qualified to talk about any racial issue whatsoever.  Conservatism (at least the old type, not the crap version being used in the White House) says that a man is responsible for his behavior.  All this "from within" is aligned with that self-evident assertion.

You might take a piece of well-intended advice.  Your chubby adulterer is NO LONGER IN THE WHITE HOUSE.  Your union-fellating Dems are hardly in control of the Congress.  Hence, your default assumption of support for Hyperliberalism is simply NOT THERE anymore.  Hence, using terms like "thinly veiled bigotry" which seems to work on college campuses to keep them Liberal, has no power in public anymore.  The entire nation oozed rightward while your beloved Liberal god was getting a blowjob from a Jewslut in the Oval Orifice.  Racial issues will be addressed without being demonized by Liberals.  If you don't like that, move to fuckin' Germany, since it appears that a balanced America is no longer your homeland.

>>45

It doesn't matter how many times you keep moving the goal posts back, you're going to have to confront your statements. The part about your bigotry being thinly veiled was me being polite.

In truth, there was nothing thinly veiled about "everybody knows about the black guy beating up his white girlfriend". My argument has nothing to do with if couples could have racial reasons for being a couple and had EVERYTHING to do with your supposition that black guys get white girlfriend because they are an easily punchable trophy. The connection between YOUR unproven assertion and the anger of a white father at his daughter having a black boyfriend is as clear as day.  

You say: "Black men get white girls for punching bag trophy" and provide nothing but anecdotal proof for the assertion.

Then a white girl's father states: "It pisses me off that you're dating a black man. They're dirty, they smell and they only date white women for a punching bad throphy"

^^^External Force is Here^^^^

You'd literally have to be insane not to see that. Instead of forming some kind of retort. You keep repeating that if I admit the racial reasons of inter-racial relationship could be racial then 'your point is made'. What point? I actually stated this very early in the thread. BEFORE post >>10.

But what we've been talking about since post >>10 is why you think the unproven and racially motavated statements you made in >>2, >>5, >>15, >>21 - made, I might add BEFORE all this trumped up nonsense about Hyperliberalism - are NOT an external force on inter-racial relationships.

The truth is, you fucktarded namefag, that the ONLY reason you keep replying is to project your behavior onto me because you think all of 4chan is watching. Accusing me of not responding or answering isn't going to work when you're literally sitting there in your mother's panties squirming.

Respond to the statement made in >>36 or continue to drown in abysmal failure. I'm not going to stop posting until you man the fuck up.

I think niggers should be more obedient towards their white masters.

>>47

>>46
Like I said before verbatim, as long as you admit that interracial couples could have racial reasons for getting together, then my point is made.  You can try to distract the readers by saying that that point is a 'moving of goalposts'.  Label it however you wish.  My point is clear and anyone who's followed along can see that.

I used a few anecdotal examples for what the POSSIBLE racial reasons are, but in the typical Hyperliberal fashion you just can't stand to ever hear that no matter how rare or prevalent the racial reason is.  Some Blacks use their White partners as trophies.  Some Whites use their Black partners as taunts to their family.  Sad to say, those are true and existing reasons, regardless of how frequently they're invoked.  Deal with it.

I should go marry a nice Muslem girl to go hack their parents off.

You married a jew?!

>>49

That's nice. But, as long as you continue to remain unresponsive to confronting the fact that your blatantly fallacious "anecdotal evidence" is the external factor that would necessitate a black person using a white partner as a trophy or a white person using a black person to taunt their family then my point is made.

As far as I'm concerned this argument ended when your response to >>10 was claiming that I was a liberal. The only way my comments would be a product of Hyperliberalism is if you never made the statements I outlined in >36. But, you did and now here we are: You desperately trying to bold and italic your way out of another debate where you're getting relentlessly skullfucked.

It'll be interesting to see how much longer you can attempt to sweep your fuck ups (or your inability to address said fuck ups) under the rug, because (like I told your mother last night while I was 8inches deep in her steaming cunt) I can go the fucking distance. 

>>51
As long as my point was made, then you have no cause to judge my anecdotes to be fallacious.  However, once again, your Hyperliberalism is quite simply making you do that, so I urge you to get help.  You're literally stuck on stupid.

Once again, I can only remind you that a person is responsible for their behavior.  This is true even if said person is Black and considers his/her SO to be a trophy.  This talk of "external factors" is just a Hyperliberal gayfailing that tries to avoid that truth.

>>52

Someone who continuously skirts around the truth should pretty much should the fuck up about it. If I'm such an obvious Hyperliberal then you should have no problem explaining:

1. why your statements are not an external force
2. why they are not fallacious and
3. why you believe there is NO connection between you (a white person) baselessly type casting blacks as prolific beaters of their white girlfriends and the bigotry of father not wanting his white daughter to date "one of them physically abusive niggers"

Your refusal to address your fallacious statements is a validation of that white father's right to unreasonably discriminate on fallacious and racially motivated grounds. Of course everyone is responsible for their own behavior, that's what I'm talking about. Your behavior is an external force that causes people to internally react. For better or for worse.

I find it ironic that someone who is afraid to confront his own internalized racism is accusing someone else of being brainwashed into racially-minded thinking by Hyperliberalists who are notoriously afraid to talk about race.

Why are you so afraid to discuss the reasons WHY a black person would consider a white person a trophy? Why are you so afraid to address that a white person's black SO only pisses off bigots who think such things as: "Everyone's heard of black fellow's beating up their white girlfriends"?

If you want to discuss race, then here it is. An accused Hyperliberal having a simple discussion about it. Why are you afraid? Scared that you might find out you're not as LIBERAL as you thought you were when it comes to race? Afraid that your LIBERAL parents didn't brainwash you to be as "COLOR BLIND" as you thought? Or are you afraid of being racially CONSERVATIVE, believing all your stereotypes and anecdotes are valid without an objective foundation?

i'm in ur thread, watching redcream get owned
there's two types of people in this thread, people who read redcream's posts and people who didn't. no non-racist has the opinions redcream does. the guy talks exactly like blacks are SUPPOSED to stick with blacks and shit. LOL "the black panthers went legit"

oh well that's a fuckin moron for ya

Niggers are aggressive beasts.

>>53
Your Hyperliberalism continues to impede you.  My statements are hardly an external force since a man is responsible for his own behavior.  Having undertaken an action, he is responsible for it and society cannot be held to blame.  That is true no matter how many Hyperliberals turn society all gayfailsome with their placing of blame "upon society".

All the rest of your so-called conclusions stem from this warped and twisted view you have of the responsibilities of rational men.  So, get back in your ivory tower before we shoot you and raep the corpse.

>>54
Identifying racial reasons why interracial couples could be together, does not mean I said races are supposed to avoid each other.  Your FAIL is EPIC.

>>56

you're dumb as fuck redcream, nobody is talking about the racial reasons why interracial couples could be together anymore. we're talking about why you think blacks beat up their white girlfriends just because they're white

and why in your first reply to this thread you said: 'blacks yearn for whiteflesh' and why you're such an expert on the black panthers

personally i could give a fuck about a nigger, but you're acting like you don't know why black+white couples have social problem surrounding them. it's not magic and it ain't internal.

blacks want white people as trophy because whites are superior. black pride went out with the panthers because they couldn't beat the superior race. i think blacks ARE trying to punish whites because they are inferior and have remained inferior and this is expressed in the culture....not internally. that's just fuckin' stupid.

>>56

That's an interesting (see: redundant) spin on things, but we've covered the hyperliberalism portion of the thread some time ago. Regardless of whatever slant you seem to think I'm coming from, the points I outlined in >>36 and >>53 still need to be addressed or you continue to failHARD.

Like anyone else would be expected to you have to:

1. Explain why your comments are not an exterior force. Clearly the notion that "black boyfriends beat up white girlfriends because they are white" is opinion that spreads due to the ignorance of men. Consider addressing this point as *you* taking responsibility for the action of spreading that baseless ignorance.

2. Respond to the following: Your refusal to address your fallacious statements is a validation of that white father's right to unreasonably discriminate on fallacious and racially motivated grounds. Of course everyone is responsible for their own behavior, that's what I'm talking about. Your behavior is an external force that causes people to internally react. For better or for worse.

I find it ironic that someone who is afraid to confront his own internalized racism is accusing someone else of being brainwashed into racially-minded thinking by Hyperliberalists who are notoriously afraid to talk about race.

3. Explain WHY BLACK+WHITE UNIONS HAVE SOCIAL PROBLEMS ASSOCIATED WITH THEM. Are these social problems having to do  with race, the problem of the couple...or a racist society?

You see, at this point it doesn't matter if you respond or not. I think the white nationalist buried deep inside your faggot-laden anus has pretty much spoken for itself since your opinion seems to mysteriously lined up with the other sturmfornt  gaylords on this board.

The only thing I'm highlighting now is the irony that you seem as deathly afraid of talking about where your opinions of race (inter-racial relationships) stem from as Hyperliberalists do.

It really don't matter where you say my ideals are coming from because now we're talking about where YOUR ideals are coming from. Get it, yet? I didn't make you say the things that were quoted in >>36...so where did they come from?

This discussion is pointless. Everyone discontinue for your own mental safety.

The kneegrows can take all the cows away for all I care!

they make brown children

gotta love how redcream got owned in this one, though. if he wanted unadulterated win he should've just responded to whatever anon asked of him. not like it matters though, it just weird when you see that kind of thing. it's obvious fail but there's nothing you can do to convince the person to stop it

STOP OUR FASCIST GOVERNMENT
ON WEDNESDAY SEPTEMBER 5TH 2007 STAND AND FIGHT
PAINT SIGNS BLACK...
TIP EVERYTHING POSSABLE....
EGG EVERYTHING...
DESTROY THE GOVERNMENT....
AND PASS THE WORD! POST THIS POST EVERY WHERE HUMANLY POSSABLE..
NOW GO!