>>38
RedCream, mai boi...Kevin Pierria uses "PWNED" and the only thing he's got "PWNED" is the market on mediocrity and shit. You see, regardless of what reasons inter-racial couples might hypothetically enter into a relationship...it is still wrong to assume problems such as abuse stem solely from race and this assumption that it does stems from pre-existent racial thought.
The reasons for a black man thinking of a white woman as a trophy or a white women dating a black man to piss her father off are only true because they are culturally and socially expressed. It's not "FROM WITHIN" when you're responding to the prevalent opinions of a
racially obsessive culture who have based those opinions on the the very thing you've based yours on - fallacy and ignorance.
It's cute that you keep pretending your view runs opposed to the negative impact of Hyperliberalism's inability to discuss race. But you are just as bad as they are because of your inability to discuss it without resorting to anecdotes, fallacy and as clearly shown in
>>36 -
thinly veiled bigotry.
>>40
That would be fine if that were the case, but as
>>36 has already pointed out. RedCream didn't start in on the Hyperliberalism stuff until
>>21. AFTER he had been called out to support his view with something other than heresy and anecdotes. Considering that he has refused to address this is highly dubious and has all the argumentative evasiveness of a Dick Cheney interview.
The only way you can still think the way you do about his view point is if you completely ignore posts
>>2, >>5, >>15, >>21. This would a different matter entirely if it weren't for those statements. Sorry, but it seems you're on the Failboat right along with RedCream and unfortunately for you it's sinking under the weight of it's own semen and compacted feces.