>>45
It doesn't matter how many times you keep moving the goal posts back, you're going to have to confront your statements. The part about your bigotry being thinly veiled was me being polite.
In truth, there was nothing thinly veiled about "everybody knows about the black guy beating up his white girlfriend". My argument has nothing to do with if couples could have racial reasons for being a couple and had EVERYTHING to do with your supposition that black guys get white girlfriend because they are an easily punchable trophy. The connection between YOUR unproven assertion and the anger of a white father at his daughter having a black boyfriend is as clear as day.
You say: "Black men get white girls for punching bag trophy" and provide nothing but anecdotal proof for the assertion.
Then a white girl's father states: "It pisses me off that you're dating a black man. They're dirty, they smell and they only date white women for a punching bad throphy"
^^^External Force is Here^^^^
You'd literally have to be insane not to see that. Instead of forming some kind of retort. You keep repeating that if I admit the racial reasons of inter-racial relationship could be racial then 'your point is made'. What point? I actually stated this very early in the thread. BEFORE post
>>10.
But what we've been talking about since post
>>10 is why you think the unproven and racially motavated statements you made in
>>2, >>5, >>15, >>21 - made, I might add BEFORE all this trumped up nonsense about Hyperliberalism - are NOT an external force on inter-racial relationships.
The truth is, you fucktarded namefag, that the ONLY reason you keep replying is to project your behavior onto me because you think all of 4chan is watching. Accusing me of not responding or answering isn't going to work when you're literally sitting there in your mother's panties squirming.
Respond to the statement made in
>>36 or continue to drown in abysmal failure. I'm not going to stop posting until you man the fuck up.