>>65
I'd say he isn't wrong. Most of the people who push racial thought are testosterone-addled teenagers and meth-addled trailer trash. It's kind of like how environmentalists can back up their beliefs with good data, have good, rational arguments, but at the end of the day they're still just a bunch of dirty hippies.
As for
>>60 and
>>61, though, you can't expect to have a serious argument if you're just going to shotgun all this shit at me. One well-constructed argument is worth a lot more than ten flat assertions.