Why is Sturmfaggotry so fallible

Why is racism made of fail? Well, this may seem self-evident but to all under&ge channers out there yet to grow a clue i will here present a list of what puts the fag in sturmfagism
1) Racism. Race is an arbitrary concept at best. Theres no genetic race, i.e. one cannot see in the DNA what race someone belongs to, and there is bigger genetic difference between two breeds of dogs than there are between an south african and an inuit. Also, all the iq tests and whatnot, when one does any statistical test that compares two groups its highly unlikely that the groups will get the same score, its just an effect of stochastic sampling, i.e. if i´d test the iq of long vs short people id find one to be smarter than the other just because of coincidence. 
2) Scapegoatism. One is a failure at life but one is such a big pussy that one needs to blame somebody else. Buhu, i lost ma jaob, nao i haet mejico. This is real faggotry unbecoming anyone who has a clue.
3) Toolism. Since racists are so angry at all those who causes their problems they are ever ready to become tools to any cynical force that need idiots by the hundreds. Examples are any church, US army, any org that sells shit (Ku Klux Klan, Stormfront etc) like music or t-shirts.
4) Idiotism. Since the safety blanket of racism is a brittle veil at best education must never enter the racists mind, else it must face its own failures at life. This also includes suspecting the media being controlled by some other force than profitability, the schools and univeristies in the hands of jewish niggerloving pinkos etc. Its like believing one is living in the matrix, nothing and noone can be trusted, one self is very special because of what color one was born of.

>>59
Jesus, you are embarresing yourself.

What do you even mean by model? In the start of the debate it was a percieved difference on your part in the handling of racism between the US and "Europe". Now its military and social and economic and everything else, and gods know what the point you are trying to make. I concede that you won the argument, since you are clearly not arguing with me but with yourself. Since you dont seem to acknowledge anything ive written in >>53 i dont really know how to continue. I guess my questions are to hard for you to answer, yet its funny that you interpret your own inabilities as argument wins. You are making me smile, thanks for that.

I cant say if thought control has legal basis in the US, i objected from the start at calling laws governing hate crimes for thought control and i still believe its a hueg strawman necessary for you to exclaim US superiority. But sure i concede just for the fuck of it, there is no legal basis in the US and there is in "Europe". Yet you have still to counter then with more obvious government meddeling in civil liberties (like COINTELPRO which you seem to ignore as a fucking plauge) of both  US citizens and non-citizens. But yeah, concentration camps, surveilence and infiltration of political groups like the salvation army, torture schools, coups, assassinations, drug running etc are harmless compared to the hellish orwellian scenario of not being allowed to incite mob violence towards minorities. You sir, are a true winnar!

And stop whining ffs, by namefaggotry you are inviting mass bullying, you are just a attention whore who does not yet understand how to handle yourself on this esteemed board of distinguished gentlemen. Lurk the fuck moar.