Why is Sturmfaggotry so fallible

Why is racism made of fail? Well, this may seem self-evident but to all under&ge channers out there yet to grow a clue i will here present a list of what puts the fag in sturmfagism
1) Racism. Race is an arbitrary concept at best. Theres no genetic race, i.e. one cannot see in the DNA what race someone belongs to, and there is bigger genetic difference between two breeds of dogs than there are between an south african and an inuit. Also, all the iq tests and whatnot, when one does any statistical test that compares two groups its highly unlikely that the groups will get the same score, its just an effect of stochastic sampling, i.e. if i´d test the iq of long vs short people id find one to be smarter than the other just because of coincidence. 
2) Scapegoatism. One is a failure at life but one is such a big pussy that one needs to blame somebody else. Buhu, i lost ma jaob, nao i haet mejico. This is real faggotry unbecoming anyone who has a clue.
3) Toolism. Since racists are so angry at all those who causes their problems they are ever ready to become tools to any cynical force that need idiots by the hundreds. Examples are any church, US army, any org that sells shit (Ku Klux Klan, Stormfront etc) like music or t-shirts.
4) Idiotism. Since the safety blanket of racism is a brittle veil at best education must never enter the racists mind, else it must face its own failures at life. This also includes suspecting the media being controlled by some other force than profitability, the schools and univeristies in the hands of jewish niggerloving pinkos etc. Its like believing one is living in the matrix, nothing and noone can be trusted, one self is very special because of what color one was born of.

Being trolled still mean I won the argument.  I don't care what you people do as long as you eventually admit that I'm right and that you're wrong.  Though control is NOT codified into American law like it is into European law, with certain exceptions which don't deny the basic truth of my statement.  The Western Model is most certainly a contentious fusion between the American Model (which largely excludes Canada and Mexico, who serve supporting roles) and the European Model.  Ask Africans and Southeast Asians if there's a Western Model, and they'll tell you a lot about military and economic interference in their affairs.  THOSE are where the Amer and Euro models are closely aligned.  HOWEVER, the models differ remarkably in where they treat their own populations, for the reasons I said over and over.  Socialized medicine is very identifiable difference between the two, and for the effect is has upon a population, it's enough to make the two models different enough to give them different names.

Like I said before, I already won this argument.  Eventually those of you without sufficient dignity and honesty will cede the point by simply going silent, or by doing some 4chan bullshit by mimicking my namefaggotry, etc.  But all that doesn't matter, since what really matters is who's right and what's right.  I've already established both.  The case is made; what remains is to have the people involved realize what the score really is (basically, RedCream [4], Opponents [BIG FAT ZERO]).