Why is Sturmfaggotry so fallible

Why is racism made of fail? Well, this may seem self-evident but to all under&ge channers out there yet to grow a clue i will here present a list of what puts the fag in sturmfagism
1) Racism. Race is an arbitrary concept at best. Theres no genetic race, i.e. one cannot see in the DNA what race someone belongs to, and there is bigger genetic difference between two breeds of dogs than there are between an south african and an inuit. Also, all the iq tests and whatnot, when one does any statistical test that compares two groups its highly unlikely that the groups will get the same score, its just an effect of stochastic sampling, i.e. if i´d test the iq of long vs short people id find one to be smarter than the other just because of coincidence. 
2) Scapegoatism. One is a failure at life but one is such a big pussy that one needs to blame somebody else. Buhu, i lost ma jaob, nao i haet mejico. This is real faggotry unbecoming anyone who has a clue.
3) Toolism. Since racists are so angry at all those who causes their problems they are ever ready to become tools to any cynical force that need idiots by the hundreds. Examples are any church, US army, any org that sells shit (Ku Klux Klan, Stormfront etc) like music or t-shirts.
4) Idiotism. Since the safety blanket of racism is a brittle veil at best education must never enter the racists mind, else it must face its own failures at life. This also includes suspecting the media being controlled by some other force than profitability, the schools and univeristies in the hands of jewish niggerloving pinkos etc. Its like believing one is living in the matrix, nothing and noone can be trusted, one self is very special because of what color one was born of.

>>45
I am #44 (as the ID should show).

Okay, so the american revolution led to a break with european thought. And Indias revolution did not create a break?
Okay, the hodgepodge you put everything you dont like and call it "the other" are part keynesianism, which the US used extensivly, both under Roosevelt (which led to a war victory, just like the command economy in the USSR) and Johnson. Its not foreign for the US, not on a philosophical scale nor on any other scale. You confuse late trends with cultural current, a common mistake for someone that has your immaturity.

Your definition of hypercapitalism is retarded because its to wide and to fuzzy. We in the civilized world call that the neoliberal paradigm or some such. Neoliberalism is the core at least, the return to classical macroeconomic theory, espoused by fascists like friedman and the rest of the chikago school.

Me, im a communist of the trotskyist kind with some eco-anarchic tendencies. We read Marx for economic counter theory and Chomsky for imperialistic examples, i assume you have read neither and ask yourself why. I as an antilibertarian have read friedman, why havent you read marx (the communist  manifesto does not count since its just a political pamphlet and not a book of theory)? If europeans have developed more thought control than the americans it seems a strange creature which assumes one is as wellread on the enemys theories as ones own. Is critical thinking thought control? You should read 1984 once again and see how your lack of language and theory has confused your reasoning to such an extent that you just dont make any sense, albeit in all wellmeaning.

COINTELPRO is not an aberration. Read the family jewels. Read more about your fucking country, and try to read the shit your sectleader does not want you to read. Form an oppinion based on facts and sober analysis, not on strawmen and slippery slope arguments.

You seem to have missed the discussion about CIA kidnapping people all over the world (not only in combat zones), flying them to either secret prisons or to states where torture is legal (like Egypt). Several of these people have been found to be innocent, kidnapped only because they share a name or made an contribution. In afghanistan the populace was paid bounties for turning in talibans. Guess what happens when you give poor people money for turning in arbitrary people? Why doesnt you know this?

And whats the difference between democratic consensus and popular suport and collusion? And why are the thought control different if its from the government than if its from private business? Why do you believe there is such a difference and why does i see them as two different sides of the same thing?