Why is Sturmfaggotry so fallible

Why is racism made of fail? Well, this may seem self-evident but to all under&ge channers out there yet to grow a clue i will here present a list of what puts the fag in sturmfagism
1) Racism. Race is an arbitrary concept at best. Theres no genetic race, i.e. one cannot see in the DNA what race someone belongs to, and there is bigger genetic difference between two breeds of dogs than there are between an south african and an inuit. Also, all the iq tests and whatnot, when one does any statistical test that compares two groups its highly unlikely that the groups will get the same score, its just an effect of stochastic sampling, i.e. if i´d test the iq of long vs short people id find one to be smarter than the other just because of coincidence. 
2) Scapegoatism. One is a failure at life but one is such a big pussy that one needs to blame somebody else. Buhu, i lost ma jaob, nao i haet mejico. This is real faggotry unbecoming anyone who has a clue.
3) Toolism. Since racists are so angry at all those who causes their problems they are ever ready to become tools to any cynical force that need idiots by the hundreds. Examples are any church, US army, any org that sells shit (Ku Klux Klan, Stormfront etc) like music or t-shirts.
4) Idiotism. Since the safety blanket of racism is a brittle veil at best education must never enter the racists mind, else it must face its own failures at life. This also includes suspecting the media being controlled by some other force than profitability, the schools and univeristies in the hands of jewish niggerloving pinkos etc. Its like believing one is living in the matrix, nothing and noone can be trusted, one self is very special because of what color one was born of.

The US was colonized by Europeans, true, but there was a remarkable break with Europe called the AMERICAN REVOLUTION.  The break with Britain was rather strong.  In contrast, Canada and Australia still pay lip service to the fucking Queen.  There's a great difference here if you'd only admit it.

At any rate, the development of the US kept it at odds with Europe.  The end product is what we see now:  America doesn't have Europe's social institutions, her socialized medicine, her restrictive laws, and so on.  In sheer size and overall cultural force, the end result is the American Model ... which by definition contrasts to the European Model.  One influences the other, but they are different and those who live within one seem to prefer it in opposition to the other.

"Market friendly" is not "Human friendly", and is one of the core reasons why Hypercapitalism is such a terrible thing.  Since you seem to be a market fundamentalist, I'm sure you don't even understand what I just said.  People are the most important thing in life, not profits.  You can still have profits after taking minimum care of people, but if you start caring more for profits the people suffer immensely.  The American Model shows how this is true.  What clouds the issue is the outrageous affluence of the minority who best benefit from the American Model.  Media outlets in the USA constantly cater to the upper middle class and you'd swear Americans were greatly wealthy by just confining yourself to reading and watching those outlets.  The truth is otherwise.

Hypercapitalism's definition is not retarded and you are just badmouthing it since stopping it is bad for your stock portfolio.  The "pursuit of privatized profits regardless of socialized costs" is the core definition.  The only thing retarded about complaining about layoffs and pollution is to deny the harmful effects of them.

Sure, privatized-profits/socialized-cost is "market friendly" alright, until the consumers are swimming the waste products of the industries they foolishly tolerated up until then.  This is why Globalism is so important to pushing the Hypercapitalist agenda ... so that capital can move much faster and farther than any labor can, and allows exploitation to occur most efficiently in labor and resource areas that are the most vulnerable.

You Marx quip is about the standard response from a Hypercapitalist who can't tolerate even one law regulating the use of capital.  Your extremist opinion in this matter can be dismissed summarily.  Being in a prevailing opinion group (i.e. with the Hypercapitalists) is not the same as being correct.

Despite aberrations like the Nixon and Bush years, America not the thoughtcrime culture like Europe is.  And as for the Taliban, sure, those people deserve trials, but they were captured during military operations and not just for standing up in a market square and espousing on certain topics.  I can hardly defend their imprisonment, as my government stopped listening to people like me a long time ago, but at least you have to admit they are there not for philosophy but for physical actions.  Without all this warfare, they would not be there.

As a final note, Sweden should put a stop to the anti-Swastika crap since it's the heart of the European Model.  The freedom of speech adopted in America can be taken up quite liberally in Europe if they'd just stop controlling thought on WWII.