They (jokingly, in most cases) call themselves the "chosen ones" in the past, they're had some pretty bad experiences with people calling themselves the "master race."
The problem with that is Jews hate other Jews. Whether it is liberal vs. orthodox or Ashkenazim vs. Miarahim.
The spirit of Judaism already died during the Haskalah (Jewish Enlightenment era). It contradict its identity of "religious" Judaism by altering into "ethnic" and "authorative" identity.
And even Orthodox Judaism is unanimosly submissioned by Israel after WWII.
So what is today's Judaism? Now the DIASPORA is over. Then what else happened? It only states that Judaism lost her future...
Christians and Muslims think they can take over the world by taking over politics.
Jews are smart, they saw that money runs the whole fucking world and money talks. So they started running banks and dealing with money. Have you ever heard of a Jewish people in Operation Save America, no, because they realize people don't give a shit about your views, but they give a shit about your money.
fail. in the middle ages, in many places jobs that had to do with banking and similar things were seen as dishonourable venues of employment, nobody liked the jews, and the jew, according the torah, found such jobs perfectly fine. So the jews set up banks, alot of jews also peddled goods, again seen as a dishonourable trade, but rather profitable. A further thing to account for was the jewish network which exists still today (and was then and maybe still at large the cause for the animosity towards jews) which enabled jews across nations, despite wars, despite religious strifes, to work together and profit for the good of the jewish community.
blah blah blah.
Name:
Anonymous2007-04-10 19:43 ID:27D0ZxOf
only way it'll happen is with a global crisis that threatens all life on earth.
then again the average politician's IQ is just above that of an acorn so even then I doubt it that would be enough for stupid greedy fuckers to let go of power...
Name:
Anonymous2007-04-10 19:53 ID:uutgRSun
Lets stay on track here we're talking about the "Jewish Question", Ok.
Name:
Anonymous2007-04-10 20:02 ID:tQd/msCr
Pfft. Jews are the most racist nuts on the face of the Earth.
Read the Torah. Or the Talmud, for that matter.
See the blood-shed and all that crap?
I think their God kills in excess of 31,000,000 people in the Torah, through estimation and addition of the numbers provided (not including the flood).
They were prolly the first to enact such religiously mandated racism and intolerance at such a broad scope.
Thankfully, not all of them are like this, there are plenty of good ones too.
Name:
Anonymous2007-04-10 20:25 ID:tQd/msCr
Think the first ever recorded genocides were written in the Old Testament (Torah). There were a number of races and tribes that were systematically exterminated either by Jews or by their God.
Only if the world achieves some form of ideal communism where everything is distributed evenly so that the whole world has at least the necessities, and if war is ended permanently, then maybe there could be a world government. Not for a looooong while though.
Name:
Anonymous2007-04-11 5:43 ID:9KJsiI70
One government to the whole world sounds crappy. Split the world in two and a have a capitalist side and a socialist side so the two wont have to battle eachother in one government.
Name:
Anonymous2007-04-11 8:30 ID:WSFCf+LN
>>17
We already did, it was called the cold war with the west unified by the fact that they were all peace loving democracies and the east unified by being part of the same communist ideal. Except the countries in the socialist side kept killing each other.
Name:
Anonymous2007-04-11 8:49 ID:9KJsiI70
>>18
Learn what socialism is before you call Soviet or China socialist.
Name:
Anonymous2007-04-11 8:53 ID:WSFCf+LN
>>19
No. You see if Mao were libertarian China would have gone the same way as the US and become a democracy. Mao was a communist however so instead of becomming communist it became totalitarian. So in fact even though totalitarianism isn't communism as per say, it is the only possible outcome. What would happen if you had 50% free market and 50% communist is what happenned in the cold war. The communists would become totalitarian and start killing each other.
yes, that's sort of in the basis of becoming a communist state, all the power of the people go to the state and then teh state dissolves itself after making sure everything is set up in self-sufficient communes where everybody live happily ever after. this always failed though and they didn't dissolve themselves but just became totalitarian regimes.
Libertarianism is basically the classical liberalism, which you can learn more about by reading soem locke or whatever, but in general will want sort of government which leaves the population adn the business as free to act as they like, but should ofc oruse protect the interests of them from other nations. this is generally easiest during democracy since benevolent dictators don't come by so often.