Could hardcore fascism help reduce crime?

In the projects and other low class areas crime is just too rife for the people there to do anything about it if they remain divided. If we unified the working population there under fascism and started spreading strong family values and fascist ethics we could easily cleanse the area of drugs. There could be youth camps where kids can gain exercise and extra education in particular humanities so they can learn who the enemies of the people really are (gangstas, rappers etc..) and that they must be the object of their hatred. For males aged 16 and above they can apply for membership as community officers under the police who are given extra powers in performing citizens arrest and work part-time keeping peace on the streets. If community officers prove themselves to be effective they can be promoted to work in equal rank to a police officer and will be supplied with weapons.

Problem solved.

theoretically, yes, but I'd rather deal with the crime than the oppression...

>>2
What you fail to understand is that you don't have to suffer either oppression or crime. How can anyone expect to be oppressed when a large portion of the population are community officers and participate in law enforcement? When every community is a self-run fortress? How can you expect crime to exist either? Fascism is one of those ideals that needs to be done finally and completely in order to work with no loop holes. So what loss would there be to ensure it's completion in a small area?

Sure, and we could cut the tubes of every woman at birth to stop abortion.

I don't think you understand better education could solve many of society's problems.

>>4
How did you come to that conclusion? I clearly stated we should create youth camps where kids can be taught who the real enemy is and of course encouraged not to be like them. You would have a community of black kids who do their homework before participating in sporting activities in public sports grounds and if anyone tried to sell them drugs they'd go directly to the nearest community officer who would jump the person responsible, check him for drugs and give him a good beating before handing the fucktard over to the police.

>>5
I came to that conclusion as I am an idiot and cannot think properly.

>>3
You are giving the government near unlimited power, obliterating civil liberties, and promoting indoctrination and racism and hatred. That is oppression you fucking nazi.

>>7
What part of my policies would give the government power? The only people gaining power here are the people who have had to put up with high crime. The power to unite and defend themselves.

>>8
http://www.thefreedictionary.com/dict.asp?Word=fascism
Well, according to the dictionary, centralization of government power, and stringent socioeconomic controls are two marks of fascism.  Both of these involve giving power to the government.  For example:  when you say you want to get rid of the fourth amendment because people's right to privacy doesn't allow Big Brother to breathe down their necks and make sure they aren't doing anything wrong, you are talking about increasing government power.  When you talk about stripping people of their rights to property in favor of a more powerful government, you are giving the government more power.  When you talk about increasing regulatory measures and appointing bureaucrats to regulate the private activities of businesses and individuals beyond what we currently have, again, you are talking about expanding government power.  When you say you want to ban all firearms and establish government agencies to make sure nobody owns or can own firearms, you talk of expanding government power.  Such policies fall under the categories of "stringent socioeconomic controls" - fascism by dictionary definition. 

>>9
I was talking about hardcore fascism. This means that it possesses such a complete and final domination over the afflicted area it can permit autonomy over everything apart from the bureaucratic services, the military and minor policing.