DONT HAVE SEX. It aint even about saving some little growth of tissue massing inside some chick. It's chicks who think they're entitled to fuck every dude they see on the street and not have to worry about what happens.
They should've never invented shit like birth control or condoms, it fucking teaches people that they don't have to take responsibility for the consequences of their actions.
Name:
Anonymous2007-02-20 19:29 ID:NTI4gbFF
god you are a fucking moron. yay, lets let the government control our bodies and sex lives! GOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO FASCISM!!
Name:
Anonymous2007-02-20 19:33 ID:SamYS7PC
>>2
god you are a fucking moron. yay, lets let the world ( SEX=BABIES LOL) control our bodies and sex lives! GOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO FASCISM!!
Name:
Anonymous2007-02-20 19:37 ID:SamYS7PC
>>2
Do you support necrophilia, bestiality, furries and polygamy too?
Name:
Anonymous2007-02-20 19:46 ID:NTI4gbFF
>>4
Bestiality, no, animals can't consent, necrophilia, no, bodies are private property, furries, no, but I don't support outlawing it, polygamy, yes, it's not that big of a deal, as long as they are all consenting adults. Polygamy is everywhere in nature. Personally though I am a one woman kinda guy.
Name:
Anonymous2007-02-20 19:52 ID:kDPT3Y3c
>>1 >>3
A baby isn't a fucking lesson. A baby is a fucking person.
And who gets the most abortions(if not all)? The poor and the young. If you outlaw abortion then you'll hurt the poor and our economy, putting your kid up for abortion means higher taxes for us. A abortion may cost taxpayers a penny each, not a dollar.
Name:
Anonymous2007-02-20 20:10 ID:SamYS7PC
>>5
Animals aren't subject to human rules. If we can kill them to eat them, we can do whatever we want to them. Bodies are fleshsacks, not private property.
>>6
Then the poor and the young deserve to have their lives ruined if theyre fucking idiots. It won't hurt the economy because the poor and the young have nothing to offer to the economy anyway.
oh and: "putting your kid up for abortion means higher taxes for us," freudian slip anyone? We shouldn't have adoption anyway, you should just be able to give babies away.
Name:
Anonymous2007-02-20 20:34 ID:h+nfvO7m
>>7
oh L.O.L. I find it funny that the person most worthy of being aborted is bitching about it. You are fucking retarded.
Name:
Anonymous2007-02-20 20:39 ID:SamYS7PC
Everyone on 4chan should've been aborted. Just the fact that theyre fucked up enough to be here is proof.
So you're saying that bodies can be used by any necropheliac to share amongst his necropheliac buddies? You sound like a pinko commie to me.
Troll.
Name:
Anonymous2007-02-20 22:48 ID:qn/S4PrB
the poor
Maybe.
and the young have nothing to offer to the economy anyway.
o rly?
I guess you don't believe in investment either.
Name:
Anonymous2007-02-20 22:49 ID:SamYS7PC
>>12
Why do you care what gets done to a body? It isnt alive. It's like if he fucked a brick. Aren't you a libertarian? Thats opposed to communism, so you make no sense.
Name:
Anonymous2007-02-21 0:33 ID:CX1Xrhzh
>>14
Ok, you offer your body as a cum depository when you die.
Name:
Anonymous2007-02-21 1:07 ID:QSPqNTvW
Sex is NOT for the sole purpose of making babies. Women get horny, without respect of their fertility, and therefore they are entitled to have sex without having to have a baby. >>1 is merely jealous that he isn't getting any.
Wow, it works. Cool, no more "OP here" shit. Anyway, >>1 needs to get laid.
Name:
Anonymous2007-02-21 1:12 ID:VvI9N9Vo
>>18
ROFL, not in the interwebs he doesn't. Ad hominem is daily routine.
By the way, the more technology that develops that gives people more freedom from consequences the better. What better purpose does it have than to make life easier?
Name:
Anonymous2007-02-21 1:14 ID:c4oxBQXg
Pedos get horny, and therefore they are entitled to have sex with >>16's kids.
Name:
Anonymous2007-02-21 1:14 ID:QSPqNTvW
>>18
Ad homo. YOU lose. (Now THAT'S an ad hominem)
Actually, my point is valid even if I didn't tack on that very important point that ">>1 is merely jealous that he isn't getting any."
Furthermore, if the consequences of an action can be eliminated (or statistically eliminated on a practical basis - 99% effective practically is 100%) the "responsibility" argument is invalid. If you are a female who cannot get pregnant due to contraception, and are sure that the person you want does not have an STD, GO FOR IT.
Name:
Anonymous2007-02-21 1:30 ID:c4oxBQXg
Furthermore, if the consequences of an action can be eliminated (or statistically eliminated on a practical basis - 99% effective practically is 100%) the "responsibility" argument is invalid. If you are a looter in a riot who will not get caught because of so many hundreds of other looters, and see a nice shiny LCD TV, GO FOR IT!
Name:
Anonymous2007-02-21 3:02 ID:YLBfs+B6
If a woman has sex with a man who uses a condom and starts whining because it made her pregnant, the man shouldn't pay a thing since he did not authorise the pregnancy.
If a woman and a man have sex with the intention of having children then the man leaves the woman, then the man has to pay child support.
Name:
Anonymous2007-02-21 5:01 ID:IaE+5zz3
>>24
exactly. such simple logic yet so many people want to twist it to suit their own agendas.
even if a looter does not get caught, there are still consequences of his actions.
Name:
Anonymous2007-02-21 14:33 ID:IY+0/p1v
but this isn't looting
fuck, why is it so hard to understand that no matter how hard you try people are going to do what the fuck they want, when they want?
1. UNDERAGE B&. Grow a beard on those nuts and then you can come back and talk with the big people.
2. Troll better. Abortion is such an easy target. Pick something like globalization or the privatization of social security if you're going to troll a politics board. Jesus Christ.
Name:
Anonymous2007-02-21 16:34 ID:c4oxBQXg
>>26
>>there are still consequences of his actions.
yeah, he gets a free TV, lol.
>>27
>>fuck, why is it so hard to understand that no matter how hard you try people are going to do what the fuck they want, when they want?
Which is exactly why we have so much crime in this world, now isn't it? Because people think they won't have to take responsibility for their actions.
Name:
Anonymous2007-02-21 23:18 ID:Jru4kOUB
>>29 is capable of one at least thought process further than, whatever >>27's opinion is it must be wrong as >>27 must be sufferring from borderline mental retardation.
Name:
Anonymous2007-02-22 0:16 ID:8UJfgNZ8
>>26
There are consequences even if the looter doesn't get caught. Stuff is then missing. Therefore, we should TRY to prevent it.
If I as a female have sex with someone, and can't get pregnant, then there are no consequences (other than hopefully a great orgasm) and no need to hold back. We shouldn't try to prevent that.
>>35
That's your only defense? Insult? If you can't argue like some semblance of an adult than gtfo faggot jewnigger.
Name:
Anonymous2007-02-22 16:46 ID:Tr2m7VPW
>>36
No you moron, some laws we make simply based on our preference. If the majority prefers bestiality be illegal, it will be illegal. End of story. No need to provide "defense" for his position; he doesn't like it, he wants it banned, period. No discussion.
Name:
Anonymous2007-02-22 16:47 ID:7BZeyWf4
>>37
I don't like a lot of things but banning them doesn't make much sense a lot of the time.
Name:
Anonymous2007-02-22 16:56 ID:EMkSNwM2
um because guys are the fuckin ones who rape people -.-
most people who have abortions---
raped people
keep ur fuckin cock and ur pants and/or learn how to take care of your goddamn baby
Name:
Anonymous2007-02-22 17:03 ID:Tr2m7VPW
>>39
HMBLPPWSSS GUYS RAPE PPL LOLZZZZA RAPE RAPE RAPE BAD UR COCK IS SMELLY I DONT LIKE COCK SEX EWWWW HRRMMMNNN AAAHHH REAPE
I kinda thought that... You know... You have to have a vagina to even get pregnant and majority of rapists are male.
You know... Male... Those people with testicles and a penis... Not a vagina...
>>43
It took me 20 minutes to read that post. Use fewer ellipses furfag.
Name:
Anonymous2007-02-23 2:30 ID:qpHhsxHJ
>>41
Dont you think if people were virgins, they wouldnt advocate something that would cause less women to have random sex?
Name:
Anonymous2007-02-24 8:14 ID:/xyhhufY
>>46
Women who need abortions are skanky whores anyway.
Name:
Anonymous2007-02-24 15:30 ID:/vMYLVt+
>>47 Men whom goad women into having abortions are filthy boars.
Name:
Anonymous2007-02-24 15:48 ID:/xyhhufY
>>48
If you're so easily "goaded" (use less retarded English please, you look like a dork) into getting an abortion then that's your own fucking problem.
And wasn't it women who were always "goading" men into getting themselves sterilized? Fucking hypocritical cunts.
Name:
Anonymous2007-02-24 16:37 ID:/vMYLVt+
>>49
You mean use 'simpler' English. Goad, used a verb, means to urge/encourage. Also, I am a man whom said that.
If men are so easily goaded into getting sterilized, then that's their problem. Troll more.
Name:
Anonymous2007-02-24 16:42 ID:/vMYLVt+
There's a whole lot of crap on 4chan. It's the lowest people can sink. All of the trash of the world spend time here, on 4chan.
Name:
Anonymous2007-02-24 17:33 ID:/xyhhufY
>>50
I know what the word means, you schmuck. It's just that it's a dumb word. You should've just used "persuade".
Also, go choke on a dick, you gutless wonder.
Name:
Anonymous2007-02-24 19:11 ID:/vMYLVt+
>>52 Men (or in this case little fucking boys such as >>52) of little mental caliber, self-esteem and openness of mind often uses a man's dick in pathetic arguements. It is predictable, non-threatening and unbelievably sad. >>50 is obviously more intelligent than you since he doesn't use insults. Get the hell out of here.
Name:
Anonymous2007-02-24 22:38 ID:h6662Sbg
>>53 ID:/vMYLVt+ >>50 ID:/vMYLVt+
AHAHAHAHAH SAME PERSON YOU FUCKING FAGGOT
>>55
nice try, like there are two 4channers on the same LAN who both happen to go to /newpol/, happened to read this thread, and happened to reply to it. Unless you know each other and he asked you to back him up, which is even more lame. You lose.
Name:
Anonymous2007-02-25 8:00 ID:UZe7ExRk
>>53 >>54
Lol, fucking owned. I knew those pro-feminism retards would finally be exposed as the same troll when poster IDs were introduced.
LOL IT R RETARDED TO LET WIMMINZ TINK 4 DEMSELVES, HUH? LOL U TK HIM 2DA BAR|?
Us pro-feminism retards, lol. Letting wimminz think for themselves and occasionally come out of the kitchen (between pregnancies). What are we even thinking?