Return Styles: Pseud0ch, Terminal, Valhalla, NES, Geocities, Blue Moon.

Pages: 1-

Black community catch 22.

Name: Anonymous 2007-02-05 11:34

Case 1: There are high crime rates in the black community.
The man's prevailing opinion: The black community requires high levels of law enforcement.
Black community's prevailing opinion: The man is doing nothing because he's racist.

Case 2: There is a disproportionate amount of blacks in jail.
The man's prevailing opinion: This is the result of high crime and high levels of law enforcement in the black community.
Black community's prevailing opinion: This is the result of the man oppressing the black community with high levels of law enforcement.

The black community's synopsis:
As levels of law enforcement increase, oppression increases and more innocent blacks are sent to jail whilst the man is praised for putting down the black man.
As law enforcement decreases, more black kids turn to drugs and live a life of crime instead of going to college whilst the man fills his pockets with the money he's saved.

The man's synopsis:
As levels of law enforcement increase, more black criminals are sent to jail, there is less crime and the man is declared racist for there being a disproportionate amount of blacks in jail.
As law enforcement decreases or more black criminals are allowed to stay on the streets, the amount of blacks in jail decreases, there is more crime and the man is declared racist for not doing anything about the crime in the black community.

Conclusion:
If the man is providing a highly efficient level of law enforcement and cannot possibly do any better, then the reason for high crime and high incarceration rates in the black community is not due to racism.
If the man is providing a low level of efficiency in law enforcement, then more innocent blacks will be sent to jail and more crime will occur directly due to negligence, likely due to racism.

Name: Anonymous 2007-02-05 12:01

Solution:Educate black people, force them to learn damnit

Name: Anonymous 2007-02-05 14:02

Solution: abolition of the family

Name: Anonymous 2007-02-05 15:16

>>3
what would that do

Name: Anonymous 2007-02-05 15:22

Name: Anonymous 2007-02-05 16:29

>>4

you stupid dummy

abolition of the family = it is possible to actually educate people: they don't go home and get de-educated after school


DUMMY

Name: Anonymous 2007-02-05 16:46

>>2
>>5

DUMMIES

Name: Anonymous 2007-02-05 18:39

>>6
What about parents who act as life coaches and care for their kids? What about the emotional trauma caused by being seperated from your parents? Not having parents is more likely to cauase de-education.

Name: Anonymous 2007-02-05 21:13

>>8

The vast majority of parents are terrible people who don't know shit from shat.  They haven't been trained to be "life coaches" and anything short of abuse is tolerated, and a lot of abuse is tolerated too.

Name: Anonymous 2007-02-05 21:43

>>9
How about we have parent licenses and for children who's parents don't have one we raise them in boarding schools and employ professional life coaches? We could also round up all the black youths, castrate them and train them from infancy to be warriors like the arabs did.

Name: Anonymous 2007-02-05 22:46

>>10

the american people are far too cowardly to use their soldiers to murder innocent people, which is necessary for soldiers to do their jobs

Name: Anonymous 2007-02-06 0:45

>>11
I see. Well taking this into account inodoctrination is more desirable.

Name: Anonymous 2007-02-06 9:27

>>10
Yeah but who gets to issue the licenses, lol, teh gobernment??!!!

Name: Anonymous 2007-02-08 0:51

>>8
'scuse me, but did you just say life coaches.. on 4chan..?????

Name: Anonymous 2007-02-08 19:55

>>14
you just did too. anyway, he meant mentoring

Name: Voly 2007-02-08 20:34

Education is certainly the key.

Education really opens up people's minds to different ways of life in this world, simultaneously increasing money the person earns. If children find out they don't have to live the way their parents do, and there is so many different things they can do in this world, maybe they will live their lives differently. Plus if they earn decent pay, there is really no need for crime.

However, young children usually don't like to study, you really need adults to force it on them. And their parents don't do that, then school teachers should.

But with current No Child Left Behind Act schools in poor neighborhoods where children don't perform well get budget cuts. What they should get is more money and more good teachers. 

Name: Anonymous 2007-02-09 2:31

>>16
I think we're still spending more than enough money even if a school gets cuts. I think the use of that money is corrupt. Have you ever been to a high school? It's worse in terms of productivity than elementary school. The people there getting a hard time are the teachers and hard working students. I say it should be the other way round, parents and pupils should be penalised instead of rewarded for having violent ignorant kids.

Name: Anonymous 2007-02-09 3:01

>>17
s/penalised/tranquilised

Name: Anonymous 2007-02-09 5:17

>>18
wut

Name: Anonymous 2007-02-09 6:17

>>19
shot with a tranquilizer gun

Name: Anonymous 2007-02-09 9:07

>>20
K.

Don't change these.
Name: Email:
Entire Thread Thread List