Return Styles: Pseud0ch, Terminal, Valhalla, NES, Geocities, Blue Moon. Entire thread

Blacks

Name: Anonymous 2007-01-28 18:45

Really, what do they contribute to society? How are they equal? Why do people say they're just as intelligent as anyone else? Just compare these two sites... http://stormfront.org (all white users) and http://rapflava.com/ (mostly blacks).

There's no denying it, blacks are pathetic.

Name: Anonymous 2007-01-30 0:48

There is nothing wrong with hardworking, decent black people just as there is nothing wrong with hardworking, decent white people. There is something wrong with lazy, ignorant black people just as there is something wrong with lazy, ignorant white people. Therefore, if you hate black people because of the lazy ignorant ones you must also hate white people.

Racism is fucking stupid and illogical in every way.

Name: Anonymous 2007-01-30 1:30

Anyone here insinuating that Africa deserved what happened to them or that it would be acceptable to kill them off for their resources is unamerican and probably going to fry in hell. Stop talking about their IQ and shit, Hong Kong and Singapore are shit compared to America which once against prove IQ means fuck all.

Second of all, Africans are stupid because the WHOLE "modern" world stripped them of their shit. You can't uproot a whole people, FUCK UP and RAPE their resources and expect them to turn out ok in 50 years! What the fuck is wrong with you dumb stormfront fucks!? The whole world is responsible for fucking Africa over and there is no way anyone with an ounce of morality would say other wise.

Name: Anonymous 2007-01-30 6:07

Hong Kong and Singapore...

City states are not countries and don't count.

>>42
Is right.

Name: Anonymous 2007-01-30 7:12

>>35
PROTIP: NO

Name: Anonymous 2007-01-30 8:54

>>42
The same happenned to India, except in this instance it was due entirely to circumstance as after colonialism ended they were able to at least feed their own children and develop modern industries.

After colonialism ended in Africa it became apparent that their inferiority was not due entirely to circumstance as they could not cease acting like savages.

Name: Anonymous 2007-01-30 9:22

http://www.brownpride.us/forum/going-all-white-school-t255.html

Compare that to Stormfront. Spicks fail

Name: Anonymous 2007-01-30 9:40

>>46
"white people r lil bitches here in delano no white people try to act tuugh cuz well fuk those fues up"
As has already been mentionned, they value acting like savages. They are inferior.

Name: Anonymous 2007-01-30 9:49

>>39
But we're kind busy with Iraq right now...

Name: Anonymous 2007-01-30 9:51

>>44
And africa has colonized how many countries? PROTIP: Learn calculus
 
>>45
Yeah, nice calling the victims savages. Means you consider the slavers non-savages, no? Maybe you even see the slavers as the height of civilisation? But let me teach you something simple: Slavowning=uncivilized=savage
In africa during the slave trade, slaves were allowed to own land, to marry, it was illegal to kill them etc. The opposite were true for slaves in the US. Who were the bigger savages?

Name: Anonymous 2007-01-30 10:12

>>45

NO, you stupid fuck. The same thing didn't happen to india. African colonization isn't comparable to ANY other type of colonization what-so-ever. There is NO comparison. Not the holocaust, not the A-bomb, nothing. Even your Ghandi link proves that! Have you even glanced at a history book in the last 20 years, you inbred scumfuck?

India has a handful of modern industries and we're talking about the last 10 or 15 years! India smaller than Africa and their population is far less diverse. More importantly they don't have white cunts STILL THERE trying to suckle every last drop of their resources.

You must be some kind of bullshit artist, a retarded moron, or a troll. There's no way anyone who has been to college can think like this. If you're really white all I have to say is: FUCK YOU FOR GIVING MY RACE A BAD NAME. I HOPE YOU DIE OF FLAMES AND RAPE.

Name: Anonymous 2007-01-30 10:17

>>45

what a shitty comeback. any anthropologist or sociology major will be able to tell you that nothing of the bloody sort can "become apparent" within such a short amount of time. africans still don't control a majority of their wealth and that is integral to the general well being of a country, especially one as big as africa. wow, you americans are so fucking stupid, i wish someone would wipe you off of the earth.

Name: Anonymous 2007-01-30 11:08

>>49
Failing to create intensive organised agricultue over large areas protected by a stable socio-military system is also uncivilised. African tribes failed to do this, they were also the ones who did the enslaving. This means they were doubly uncivilised.

>>50
>>51
Using profanity is the trademark of someone who is genetically inferior. Since you should not be considerred human I don't have to respond to you.

Name: Anonymous 2007-01-30 11:23

>>52
African soils are very old, compared to american, european and asian soils. They are this because the latest ice-ages have not covered them. Old soils get degraded over time, losing their nutrients (mainly the cations but also N, P and organic matter). This is why african soils are (generally) red, and that the red layer goes very deep (the red comes from dissolved iron). These soils have very low yield, its first today you can increase the yield significantly. Despite these environmental problems were they civilized enough to let their slaves marry and raise families. What was the american excuse not to?

Name: Anonymous 2007-01-30 12:00

>>49
The number of deaths due to violent revolts against colonization was probably much less than those who would've died of starvation due to inadequate nutrition or deaths as a side effect of native rituals like female circumcision.

>>53
Does this mean that when global warming destroys the 5 primary continents, we can all move to Antarctica and enjoy the fertile soil under the melt? Oh and they wanted to breed the slaves to create a masterrace of workers obviously. Mmmm mmm Hitlar.

Name: Anonymous 2007-01-30 12:20

>>53
The ice caps only coverred northern europe, stopping halfway through england. This means the inhabitants of central europe, the mediteranean, India, China, Japan, most of the Americas and the middle east had similiar "age" soils.

Also the only place you will find "young" soil would be around volcanic regions. By your reasonning Iceland should be the most fertile place on the planet.

Name: Anonymous 2007-01-30 12:22

Never relax.

Name: pedobear 2007-01-30 12:34

"The soil represents the surface layer, of the earth's crust, resulting from the transformation of the bare rock, enriched by organic input.
At the beginning of a soil formation, only the bare rock outcrops. It is gradually colonized by pioneer species (lichens and mosses), then herbaceous vegetation, shrubs and finally forest. In parallel a first humus-bearing horizon is formed (the A horizon), followed by some mineral horizons (B horizons). Each successive stage is characterized by a certain association of soil/vegetation and environment, which defines an ecosystem.
After a certain time of parallel evolution between the ground and the vegetation, a state of steady balance is reached; this stage of development is called climax by some ecologists and "natural potential" by others. Succession is the evolution towards climax. Regardless of its name, the equilibrium stage of primary succession is the highest natural form of development that the environmental factors are capable of producing.
The cycles of evolution of soils have very variable durations, between a thousand-year-old for soils of quick evolution (A horizon only) to more than a million of years for soils of slow development. The same soil may achieve several successive steady state conditions during its existence, as exhibited by the Pygmy forest sequence in Mendocino County, California. Soils naturally reach a state of high productivity from which they naturally degrade as mineral nutrients are removed from the soil system. Thus older soils are more vulnerable to the effects of induced retrogression and degradation."
from http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Soils_retrogression_and_degradation

Name: Anonymous 2007-01-30 13:19

NIGGER FREEMASONS!

THE TRUTH BE TOLD!

Name: Anonymous 2007-01-30 14:39

>>57
The ice caps only coverred northern europe, stopping halfway through england. This means the inhabitants of central europe, the mediteranean, India, China, Japan, most of the Americas and the middle east had similiar "age" soils.

I'm not suprised a liberal and a person who denies racial reality turns out to be a pedophile.

Name: Anonymous 2007-01-30 15:41

>>42
Somewhere there is an empty owen with your name on it.

Name: Anonymous 2007-01-30 15:46

>>52

LMAO! NEWFLASH: YOU DON'T BELONG ON 4CHAN YOU RACIST PIECE OF SHIT.

Name: Anonymous 2007-01-30 15:51

>>59

A pedophile on my 4chan!? Do us a favor and stop disgracing the rest of us whites that are educated enough to understand the race issue isn't primarily used to divvy up and control anyone below a certain IQ level. Go cry somewhere else, loser! You just got proven wrong.

Name: Anonymous 2007-01-30 15:58

>>52

once again, the reasoning behind any inability to do what you listed is primarily the fault of the colonist's ancestors still controlling africa's wealth. if you really hated these people and wanted to prove a point, you'd be all for leaving these people alone and giving them their land and their wealth back. but we germans know something about the american way of thinking that you americans do not know. you are one of the most afraid of being wrong in the civilized world and when you are proven wrong over and over again you do this thing where you deny anything that is perfectly logical evidence proving you wrong.

Name: Anonymous 2007-01-30 17:00

>>62
 here
I meant "IS primarily used to divvy up....etc"

Name: Anonymous 2007-01-30 18:00

>>61
>>62
you obviously don't know what 4chan is about, its full of racists and pedophiles
gb2 Gaia you faggits

Name: Anonymous 2007-01-30 21:50

dfgddfdfddsxz

Name: Anonymous 2007-01-31 4:28

>>61
Epic and hard fail

Name: Anonymous 2007-01-31 10:12

>>64
The ice caps didn't cover central europe, the mediteranean, India, China, Japan, most of the Americas and the middle east. So your point is void.

Name: Anonymous 2007-01-31 11:47

blacks and jews... bad news!

Name: Anonymous 2007-01-31 13:30

The effect of the ice, or actually the melting of the ice, has a larger area of effect than just the glaciers. Most of the china, america and middle east has infertile soils also, but the disturbance and therefore regeneration is more recent than the african soils. A soils age is how far it has progressed in its natural evolution, and actions that disturbe this progression (like ice movement or being covered by water, but it can be other types of action) resupply nutrients and regress the progression. Generally, africa has the oldest in this sense soils. Book concerning this matter: http://www.amazon.com/Guns-Germs-Steel-Fates-Societies/dp/0393317552

Name: Anonymous 2007-01-31 13:41

>>70
"The effect of the ice, or actually the melting of the ice, has a larger area of effect than just the glaciers."
No where in scientific history has this ever been suggested. It only affects the area coverred in thousands of tons of ice. The regions with the highest soil fertility in the world are found in the tropics which was why europeans were so eager to leave their harsh environment and grow crops elsewhere. Tropicals regions are also blessed with wider bio-diversity, making it an agricultural paradise.

Name: Anonymous 2007-01-31 15:29

>>71
In any given landscape, where do you find the most fertile soil? In valleys. Why? Because this is where water has stayed for the longest, depositing fine particles like clay etc. The area around glaciers are water covered. Thats why their area of effect is greater than their actual extent.

Name: Anonymous 2007-01-31 16:52

>>72
But the area of effect was at most a few miles along a river in area that are either freezing cold anyway or central england. Also this happenned 10000 years ago. There are no excuses.

Name: Anonymous 2007-02-01 9:42

>>73
So what is your excuse for beign an idiot? Mother did crack?

Name: Anonymous 2007-02-01 10:39

>>65


>>62 here.
my comment was sarcastic. >>59 fails hard for pointing out a pedo in sea of pedos (4chan)

Name: Anonymous 2007-02-01 13:01

>>75
>>59 doesn't fail for pointing out that liberals are pedophiles. NAMBLA consists mainly of pedos, conservatives regularly persecute pedos and the right wing make sure their assholes get pounded hard in jail despite accusations of barbarity from whining hippies. Liberals in fact love criminals of all sorts, which is why they love blacks.

Name: Anonymous 2007-02-01 13:49

liberals don't love blacks, just black cock.

Name: Anonymous 2007-02-01 13:57

>>76
You're wrong. Liberals are dirty commies. Pedos are almost always extreme geeks and libertarians. They live in their parents basements or those with jobs(often server admins such) middle of nowhere all alone. They won't be prosecuted cause they're too scared to make social contact with anyone and they know their computers many are even hackers thus CP is only circulated in well hidden places using encrypted connections. Pedos who get prosecuted are old dying generation of pedos and are typically old men bored of adult women or sometimes bored of whole female sex and want to try boys.

Name: Anonymous 2007-02-01 16:28

>>76

you must be >>59, then. because it doesn't make sense to treat pedos or people who cuss as some unimaginable anomoly on 4chan. liberal or not. also, you need to back up your claims with proof instead of literally pulling shit out of your ass. oh wait THIS IS 4CHON ^_^

Name: Anonymous 2007-02-01 20:24

4chan gives peds a human face, and it is ugly

Newer Posts
Don't change these.
Name: Email:
Entire Thread Thread List