Really, what do they contribute to society? How are they equal? Why do people say they're just as intelligent as anyone else? Just compare these two sites... http://stormfront.org (all white users) and http://rapflava.com/ (mostly blacks).
There's no denying it, blacks are pathetic.
Name:
Anonymous2007-01-28 18:54
BIX NOOD
Name:
Anonymous2007-01-28 20:13
Its not that they're stupid, its their up bringing and enviroment that led to fucking ghetto culture.
What we need to do is fucking wipe this culture off the planet
Explain the inherant differences between so-called "Black Culture" and "White Culture"? How is "Black Culture" the fault of black people, when blacks are generally exposed to the same things whites are?
Name:
Anonymous2007-01-29 5:20
>>5
Ebonics, rap, life in run-down slums, poverty... Not man white people are involved in that, are they?
Excuse me, but there are white people who use "Ebonics", live in run down slums and are impoverished. More importantly there are white people who don't use slang or ebonics and aren't poor that listen to and support "rap culture". So, right off the bat your premise is illogical. If a substancial number of white people didn't actually like black culture then it wouldn't exist because whites are the majoirty in America.
America's status quo is geared towards whites and has been every since the beginning of the country. Slavery and the 100 years or so afterwards (Jim Crow) has historically been the fault of the whites. These Africans didn't ask to be brought here, they didn't ask to be interbred with the white population, they didn't ask to be bred into stupity, they didn't ask to be enslaved and they certainly didn't ask to be treated like sub-humans AFTER they were "Freed".
So do you really think, in a country run largely by whites FOR whites that they themselves don't serve as a catylst for "Black Culture"? And you still haven't answered my question about what makes the two cultures different. From what I've seen they pretty much geared towards the same thing. The only difference is the one that white people can't seem to grasp- for a time in America's history it was acceptable to treat blacks as sub-humans. So, how is anything that happens afterwards totally within their control when they've only been in control of theirselves for barely 50 years now?
Get a grip and realize that you're being unreasonable here. Either that or you're not studying enough American history to aptly address racial relations in this country.
You also forgot the motto of black people: Get rich or die tryin
or thinking education is stupid because you'll just become famous for no apparent reason(70 percent of the black people in my school think this)
Name:
Anonymous2007-01-29 7:30
Silly coons...
Name:
Anonymous2007-01-29 7:31
>>8
I prefer to think ofm yself as a homosexual. I take my homosexuality very seriously, to the point of sucking complete stranger's cocks in a custom we homosexuals call cottaging. It is very enjoyable, perhaps you could look into it.
The fact that you (A) Seem unwilling or afraid to address anything in >>7 ...and (B) Think his/her race or his/her political affiliation are of any relevance means that either you are not capable of defending your worldview in reasonable manner or that you're just not very smart and don't have a reason for the way you think outside of what was said in >>7. (Notice that I basically just said the same thing twice)
i don't get it. what's wrong with wanting to be rich with little effort and maximum profit? that's the kind of capitalism and consumerism this country runs on. white people think the same shit "get rich or die (or kill, or steal) trying".
the idea that you would fault blacks for not wanting to play into a system that the world's RICHEST and most POWERFUL don't play into themselves just sounds fucking nuts. and i'm white and fairly rich
Name:
Honky McCracken2007-01-29 8:05
White culture is the most barbaric this planet has seen. And as barbarians, this culture refuses to see its exploits as the atrocities they are but instead claim it is a product of breeding and civilisation. Well, the only thing white people excelled at comared to other cultures is spreading germs! Thats it! Without the germs, no easy colonisation of north and sout america, meaning they prolly be indipendent nations today (like china and india), and whites would just exist in a little pocket in europe. Well, next time you are proud to be white, remember its all because our ancestors didnt wash their hands after theyd been to the toilet.
Name:
Anonymous2007-01-29 8:50
>>14
Next time you utilise free speech, remember it is because white soldiers died fighting the confederates and nazis.
>>15 Was slavery necessary for free speech? Remember that 14 was also including Europe. And we Europeans have played quite a hardcore game. Africa, Haiti, Algeria, Latin America, India and I could go on.
Proving once again the illogical fallacy of racism. Do you realize how easily the American power structure manipulates you fucking morons? Guess what: Jesse Jackson, Al Sharpton and their white counter parts (take your pick) are all Free Masons. That doesn't seem weird to you?
Name:
Anonymous2007-01-29 11:28
i really just wish people like >>1 would STOP POSTING. it leaves a bad taste in my mouth when people like >>1 can't follow through on a debate. these threads usually go like this:
a: niggers is stupid.
b: logical retort, void of racism, etc
a: niggers is worthless
b: logical retort, void of racism, showing racism is illogical
a: niggers is worthless
FUCK- SERIOUSLY GO TROLL SOMEWHERE ELSE
OLD SHIT IS OLLLLLDDDDD
Name:
Anonymous2007-01-29 11:33
14 seriously thinks the injuns could stop the white man's superior firepower and technology
Name:
Anonymous2007-01-29 11:55
>>20 >>18 here. I have said nothing to imply I am racist so why are you trying to bunch me up with >>19? And what's with this conspiracy theory?
Well, I assumed that because it wasn't only whites that died in the Civil War and WW2. "Good Whites vs Bad Whites"? LMAO. Okay, buddy.
As for your conspiracy theory crap, go shovel it somewhere else. Al Sharpton and Jesse Jackson ARE freemasons. Deal with reality.
Name:
Anonymous2007-01-29 12:38
>>24
The sentence only consisted of 5 words. Stop nitpicking.
Only 0.1% of blacks listen to Al Sharpton and Jesse Jackson and most of them aren't botherred. So if the illuminati are taking over the world they aren't very succesful and it has nothing to do with me.
Name:
yo mama2007-01-29 13:00
African Blacks are real Blacks.
American Blacks are just crap.
Name:
Anonymous2007-01-29 14:19
FREEMASONS!
Oh yeah, that matters.
Name:
Anonymous2007-01-29 14:28
>>26
I agree. African Amercans are stupid niggers and but those in Africa are not so bad, 'cause they aren't as corrupt, aside from South Africa...
Oh yeah, Africans are SO MUCH better than African Americans. First, they get us shipped over to America. And then they can't get enough white people out of their country for them to do better than us. (African American are WAY more educated and Affluent)
And even if you shitty statement was correct all that would mean is that the Africans who had the less exposure to WHITE PEOPLE came out better. Big whoop.
Name:
Anonymous2007-01-29 15:20
>>28
do you fucking no anything about Africa?Or there soceity?
Average IQ of a Sub Saharan African is 70, Average IQ of a African American is 85.
Face it, with intelligence comes corruption, because smart people can manipulate people and lie to make it to the top.
Also, the crime rate in Africa is horrible
Africa is the failure continent
Africa would've been just fine if the whole world didn't decide to gangrape it for everything it had.
Name:
Anonymous2007-01-29 17:09
>>31
Africa would've been just fine if it wasn't a bunch of naked bushmen hunting rabbits for food before the white man showed up
Name:
Anonymous2007-01-29 17:55
>>32
Europe would be fine if it wasnt for the inbred retards wanting to shit in golden toilets.
USA would be fine if it wasnt for the inbred retards wanting to bathe in oil to remove the shame.
PROTIP: barbarism is not intelligence nor civilisation. Gandi was not white. Hitler were.
Name:
Anonymous2007-01-29 18:34
>>33
PROTIP: There's a lot more wrong with Africa than the US or Europe
Name:
Anonymous2007-01-29 19:11
>>34
PROTIP: US and Europe is a lot more responsible for the suffering in the world than Africa.
Name:
Anonymous2007-01-29 20:15
>>35
PROTIP: If Africans weren't stupid they would have less problems
Asian countries such as Hong Kong and Singapore have the highest IQ...hmm..
Name:
Anonymous2007-01-30 0:48
There is nothing wrong with hardworking, decent black people just as there is nothing wrong with hardworking, decent white people. There is something wrong with lazy, ignorant black people just as there is something wrong with lazy, ignorant white people. Therefore, if you hate black people because of the lazy ignorant ones you must also hate white people.
Racism is fucking stupid and illogical in every way.
Name:
Anonymous2007-01-30 1:30
Anyone here insinuating that Africa deserved what happened to them or that it would be acceptable to kill them off for their resources is unamerican and probably going to fry in hell. Stop talking about their IQ and shit, Hong Kong and Singapore are shit compared to America which once against prove IQ means fuck all.
Second of all, Africans are stupid because the WHOLE "modern" world stripped them of their shit. You can't uproot a whole people, FUCK UP and RAPE their resources and expect them to turn out ok in 50 years! What the fuck is wrong with you dumb stormfront fucks!? The whole world is responsible for fucking Africa over and there is no way anyone with an ounce of morality would say other wise.
>>42
The same happenned to India, except in this instance it was due entirely to circumstance as after colonialism ended they were able to at least feed their own children and develop modern industries.
After colonialism ended in Africa it became apparent that their inferiority was not due entirely to circumstance as they could not cease acting like savages.
>>46
"white people r lil bitches here in delano no white people try to act tuugh cuz well fuk those fues up"
As has already been mentionned, they value acting like savages. They are inferior.
>>44
And africa has colonized how many countries? PROTIP: Learn calculus
>>45
Yeah, nice calling the victims savages. Means you consider the slavers non-savages, no? Maybe you even see the slavers as the height of civilisation? But let me teach you something simple: Slavowning=uncivilized=savage
In africa during the slave trade, slaves were allowed to own land, to marry, it was illegal to kill them etc. The opposite were true for slaves in the US. Who were the bigger savages?
NO, you stupid fuck. The same thing didn't happen to india. African colonization isn't comparable to ANY other type of colonization what-so-ever. There is NO comparison. Not the holocaust, not the A-bomb, nothing. Even your Ghandi link proves that! Have you even glanced at a history book in the last 20 years, you inbred scumfuck?
India has a handful of modern industries and we're talking about the last 10 or 15 years! India smaller than Africa and their population is far less diverse. More importantly they don't have white cunts STILL THERE trying to suckle every last drop of their resources.
You must be some kind of bullshit artist, a retarded moron, or a troll. There's no way anyone who has been to college can think like this. If you're really white all I have to say is: FUCK YOU FOR GIVING MY RACE A BAD NAME. I HOPE YOU DIE OF FLAMES AND RAPE.
what a shitty comeback. any anthropologist or sociology major will be able to tell you that nothing of the bloody sort can "become apparent" within such a short amount of time. africans still don't control a majority of their wealth and that is integral to the general well being of a country, especially one as big as africa. wow, you americans are so fucking stupid, i wish someone would wipe you off of the earth.
Name:
Anonymous2007-01-30 11:08
>>49
Failing to create intensive organised agricultue over large areas protected by a stable socio-military system is also uncivilised. African tribes failed to do this, they were also the ones who did the enslaving. This means they were doubly uncivilised.
>>50 >>51
Using profanity is the trademark of someone who is genetically inferior. Since you should not be considerred human I don't have to respond to you.
Name:
Anonymous2007-01-30 11:23
>>52
African soils are very old, compared to american, european and asian soils. They are this because the latest ice-ages have not covered them. Old soils get degraded over time, losing their nutrients (mainly the cations but also N, P and organic matter). This is why african soils are (generally) red, and that the red layer goes very deep (the red comes from dissolved iron). These soils have very low yield, its first today you can increase the yield significantly. Despite these environmental problems were they civilized enough to let their slaves marry and raise families. What was the american excuse not to?
Name:
Anonymous2007-01-30 12:00
>>49
The number of deaths due to violent revolts against colonization was probably much less than those who would've died of starvation due to inadequate nutrition or deaths as a side effect of native rituals like female circumcision.
>>53
Does this mean that when global warming destroys the 5 primary continents, we can all move to Antarctica and enjoy the fertile soil under the melt? Oh and they wanted to breed the slaves to create a masterrace of workers obviously. Mmmm mmm Hitlar.
Name:
Anonymous2007-01-30 12:20
>>53
The ice caps only coverred northern europe, stopping halfway through england. This means the inhabitants of central europe, the mediteranean, India, China, Japan, most of the Americas and the middle east had similiar "age" soils.
Also the only place you will find "young" soil would be around volcanic regions. By your reasonning Iceland should be the most fertile place on the planet.
Name:
Anonymous2007-01-30 12:22
Never relax.
Name:
pedobear2007-01-30 12:34
"The soil represents the surface layer, of the earth's crust, resulting from the transformation of the bare rock, enriched by organic input.
At the beginning of a soil formation, only the bare rock outcrops. It is gradually colonized by pioneer species (lichens and mosses), then herbaceous vegetation, shrubs and finally forest. In parallel a first humus-bearing horizon is formed (the A horizon), followed by some mineral horizons (B horizons). Each successive stage is characterized by a certain association of soil/vegetation and environment, which defines an ecosystem.
After a certain time of parallel evolution between the ground and the vegetation, a state of steady balance is reached; this stage of development is called climax by some ecologists and "natural potential" by others. Succession is the evolution towards climax. Regardless of its name, the equilibrium stage of primary succession is the highest natural form of development that the environmental factors are capable of producing.
The cycles of evolution of soils have very variable durations, between a thousand-year-old for soils of quick evolution (A horizon only) to more than a million of years for soils of slow development. The same soil may achieve several successive steady state conditions during its existence, as exhibited by the Pygmy forest sequence in Mendocino County, California. Soils naturally reach a state of high productivity from which they naturally degrade as mineral nutrients are removed from the soil system. Thus older soils are more vulnerable to the effects of induced retrogression and degradation."
from http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Soils_retrogression_and_degradation
Name:
Anonymous2007-01-30 13:19
NIGGER FREEMASONS!
THE TRUTH BE TOLD!
Name:
Anonymous2007-01-30 14:39
>>57
The ice caps only coverred northern europe, stopping halfway through england. This means the inhabitants of central europe, the mediteranean, India, China, Japan, most of the Americas and the middle east had similiar "age" soils.
I'm not suprised a liberal and a person who denies racial reality turns out to be a pedophile.
Name:
Anonymous2007-01-30 15:41
>>42
Somewhere there is an empty owen with your name on it.
A pedophile on my 4chan!? Do us a favor and stop disgracing the rest of us whites that are educated enough to understand the race issue isn't primarily used to divvy up and control anyone below a certain IQ level. Go cry somewhere else, loser! You just got proven wrong.
once again, the reasoning behind any inability to do what you listed is primarily the fault of the colonist's ancestors still controlling africa's wealth. if you really hated these people and wanted to prove a point, you'd be all for leaving these people alone and giving them their land and their wealth back. but we germans know something about the american way of thinking that you americans do not know. you are one of the most afraid of being wrong in the civilized world and when you are proven wrong over and over again you do this thing where you deny anything that is perfectly logical evidence proving you wrong.
Name:
Anonymous2007-01-30 17:00
>>62
here
I meant "IS primarily used to divvy up....etc"
Name:
Anonymous2007-01-30 18:00
>>61 >>62
you obviously don't know what 4chan is about, its full of racists and pedophiles
gb2 Gaia you faggits
>>64
The ice caps didn't cover central europe, the mediteranean, India, China, Japan, most of the Americas and the middle east. So your point is void.
Name:
Anonymous2007-01-31 11:47
blacks and jews... bad news!
Name:
Anonymous2007-01-31 13:30
The effect of the ice, or actually the melting of the ice, has a larger area of effect than just the glaciers. Most of the china, america and middle east has infertile soils also, but the disturbance and therefore regeneration is more recent than the african soils. A soils age is how far it has progressed in its natural evolution, and actions that disturbe this progression (like ice movement or being covered by water, but it can be other types of action) resupply nutrients and regress the progression. Generally, africa has the oldest in this sense soils. Book concerning this matter: http://www.amazon.com/Guns-Germs-Steel-Fates-Societies/dp/0393317552
Name:
Anonymous2007-01-31 13:41
>>70
"The effect of the ice, or actually the melting of the ice, has a larger area of effect than just the glaciers."
No where in scientific history has this ever been suggested. It only affects the area coverred in thousands of tons of ice. The regions with the highest soil fertility in the world are found in the tropics which was why europeans were so eager to leave their harsh environment and grow crops elsewhere. Tropicals regions are also blessed with wider bio-diversity, making it an agricultural paradise.
Name:
Anonymous2007-01-31 15:29
>>71
In any given landscape, where do you find the most fertile soil? In valleys. Why? Because this is where water has stayed for the longest, depositing fine particles like clay etc. The area around glaciers are water covered. Thats why their area of effect is greater than their actual extent.
Name:
Anonymous2007-01-31 16:52
>>72
But the area of effect was at most a few miles along a river in area that are either freezing cold anyway or central england. Also this happenned 10000 years ago. There are no excuses.
Name:
Anonymous2007-02-01 9:42
>>73
So what is your excuse for beign an idiot? Mother did crack?
>>62 here.
my comment was sarcastic. >>59 fails hard for pointing out a pedo in sea of pedos (4chan)
Name:
Anonymous2007-02-01 13:01
>>75 >>59 doesn't fail for pointing out that liberals are pedophiles. NAMBLA consists mainly of pedos, conservatives regularly persecute pedos and the right wing make sure their assholes get pounded hard in jail despite accusations of barbarity from whining hippies. Liberals in fact love criminals of all sorts, which is why they love blacks.
Name:
Anonymous2007-02-01 13:49
liberals don't love blacks, just black cock.
Name:
Anonymous2007-02-01 13:57
>>76
You're wrong. Liberals are dirty commies. Pedos are almost always extreme geeks and libertarians. They live in their parents basements or those with jobs(often server admins such) middle of nowhere all alone. They won't be prosecuted cause they're too scared to make social contact with anyone and they know their computers many are even hackers thus CP is only circulated in well hidden places using encrypted connections. Pedos who get prosecuted are old dying generation of pedos and are typically old men bored of adult women or sometimes bored of whole female sex and want to try boys.
you must be >>59, then. because it doesn't make sense to treat pedos or people who cuss as some unimaginable anomoly on 4chan. liberal or not. also, you need to back up your claims with proof instead of literally pulling shit out of your ass. oh wait THIS IS 4CHON ^_^
Name:
Anonymous2007-02-01 20:24
4chan gives peds a human face, and it is ugly
Name:
Anonymous2007-02-01 23:49
>>78
Well you're talking out of your ass as there is no evidence whilst NAMBLA is an actively an openly liberal organisation and liberals are always whining about how pedophiles are "persecuted".
Name:
Anonymous2007-02-02 12:14
>>81
Take a look at /b/ or not4chan. There's your evidence. Sadly 7chan, 12chan and ultra-relevant onion-chan are dead. They could have given you more evidence.
Name:
mis-reign2007-02-02 13:01
*ignores argument about 4chan*
i cant be racist. if i am found being racist in my country i get charged.
we have no freedom of speech.
and we cant insult anyone who isnt white here. if you do, you are "racist" no matter what you say. this isn't fair. it's making me racist. which is ironic.
Name:
Anonymous2007-02-02 13:34
>>82
Of course there are some libertarian and right wing pedophiles, but they are a smaller minority compared to liberals.
Fascists are psychotically anti-pedophile, they were the few minorities to be exterminated before the jews. The first thing Hal Turner did when he was being spammed was claim that 4chan and ebaums were paedophiles to rile up his thugs. This all trickles down into the moral right.
Libertarians are for sexual freedom, but not if it abuses another person's liberty. The majority of anti-pedophiles movements are inhabitted by libertarians who idolise vigilantes but have nothing to do, bikers and the NRA for example.
Liberals take sexual freedom to the extreme, according their god. Karl Marx you are not supposed to own anything, even your own body which of course leads to many other evils aswell as child abuse. There are also 2 stupid ideas which circulate within liberals which contribute to their justification of chold rape. First being that anything society doesn't like is an evil plot by capitalists, thus criminals are in fact a persecuted minority. Secondly being that a person's level of sentience is determinned by how educated the "clean slate" of the mind is, which culminated in the mass killings by the Khmer rouge who saw uneducated peasants and babies as little more than animals. Liberals only oppose pedophilia for populist reasons, like everything else. In their perfect world pedophilia would be acceptable.
I hope this opens your eyes to how thoroughly fucked up liberalism is.
Name:
Anonymous2007-02-02 18:31
>>84
I think difference here is that you assume that a pedophile = child abuser. If that's what you mean then you're right. NAMBLA and other "free child-sex" advocates are mostly liberal I think, but most libertarians want to end witch hunt of pedophiles and legalize CP as it's just recording and abuse it depicts has been already done and banning it won't save anyone. In my opinion pedophile = sexually attracted to kids, but doesn't necessarily abuse them. I know lots of pedos myself, but none of them abuses kids and most see it as wrong thing. Personally I'm not pedo, but an autopedophile. Meaning I'm so fucked up I want to be little boy and get abused in pooper by older men.
Ironic? I think the word you're looking for MOronic. As in: "Your reasoning is moronic, therefore you are a moron."
How is not being able to "be racist" making you racist? That's just 29 kinds of fucking stupid. Could it instead be, that you've always been a racist? Because Why would non-racist care if he wasn't allowed to express racism?
>>1
Hopefully the declining birthrate of your race will prevent more of you idiots from polluting America and balance out this country a bit. Oh, and comparing a White Pride site filled with losers and nothing but time on their hands to a Hip-Hop site filled with teenagers and young adults who are actually productive to this country is pretty retarded.
Name:
Anonymous2007-02-03 18:06
>>89
Have you been to that site? What about whites who aren't racist? Should they agree with you and allow teenagers to be indoctrinated to hate whites and be glad white birth rates are declining?
Name:
Anonymous2007-02-03 21:59
RACISM IS POINTLESS, WERE ALL EQUALLY WORTHLESS
WERE ALL JUST LITTLE PIECES OF SHIT ON A BIG SHITBALL
AND NONE OF OUR LIVES HAVE ANY MEANING
eat that racists
Think about what you're saying for a second. The Stormfront site is about racist whites and also indoctrinating non-racist whites to their way of thinking. If minorites and the free-world at large have to tolerate that site, then blacks and other minorities have to tolerate Stormfront.
Plus, I think you're misunderstand that nature of racism in that it's just a bunch of uneducated idiots blaming others for problems of the world without realizing that they are apart of the problem. This goes for all races. Making one out to be better or worse than the other is illogical and wrong. It's the lack of logic that makes you wrong.
Name:
Anonymous2007-02-04 1:32
>>92
State clearly what opinion you think is wrong.
I already did. Basically, I'm saying you're a hypocrite. Why is it wrong for minorites to be indoctrinated into hating whites, but it is acceptable to you that whites be indoctrinated into hating other so-called minorities?
The whites who aren't racist, aren't effected by either sites anyway because they aren't racist in the first place. What would it matter to them if they stumbled onto BrownPride or WhitePride? Why would it make a difference when they don't believe that whites or any race is superior to any other?
>>94
Quote where I said anything remotely close to "it is acceptable to you that whites be indoctrinated into hating other so-called minorities".
Name:
Anonymous2007-02-04 12:15
>>94
My only disagreement with you is that you are putting words in my mouth and that I think racism does matter. Whether someone says "I am glad blacks are dying of AIDS" or "I am glad whites have low birth rates", it matters because that person is acting like an idiot and who knows what they would do if they were in any position of power.
Name:
Anonymous2007-02-04 13:31
>>89
Actually productive? So leeching off of welfare and wasting time online insulting others eloquently is productivity? If you looked on that site, they are producing niether music nor poetry. What they do are "rap battles", where two people try to insult each other whilst rhyming. I don't see how that's making any sort of progress.
The blacks on that site also advocate violence, whereas the people of Stormfront are against that sort of thing and prefer to be civil. Both sites accurately represent their respective races, too.
No they don't, though. Because not all "respective races" are inherantly racist just because of some fuckbrains on a website. I can assure you that regardless of race everyone leeches off of society and civilization in some way, there are hundreds of corporations owned by white men that are doing that as we speak.
"Progress" is a subjective concept that serves as a loaded word to make your argument appear to be on the side of civilization and progress when your world implictly denies any such path more or less due to your own ignorance.
Oh noes! Blacks on the site advocate violence? Oh yeah? So does New American Century. So does Hal Turner's site. But since they're white it's AWWWWRIGHT, huh?
Finally, you mental midget, there's no way you can civily discuss why another race is inferior to yours. The real civil thing to do is to treat people based on merit and those that are unable to do this simply aren't meritable.