are these peoples considered white:

-italians
-poles
-croats (and other assorted slavs)
-romanians
-icelandic people?

>>39
Race is a social construct based on fact. Like the theory of electro-magnetism.

You have white skin, you are white.  Thats the way these things work.  Don't get all fucking worked up in shitty superiority delusions.

You have white skin; you are white.  That's how these things work.

Note that Celts are not Indo-European, but are still considered white.
White = Slavs, Nordics, Celts, and Mediterraneans.

The only original Europeans I don't think are white are the Lapps, because they were from a group that migrated there long before the Celts of Indo-Europeans, and we still don't know where they're from.

Once upon a time, celts were considered inferior, hot-blooded fast-breeding catlicks. Now they're whites who burn in the sun, like booze and have a funny accents.

Japanese used to be honorary whites, but now asians are no longer considered an inferior race, we whiteys just think they're playing dirty and underhanded.

We finns were, until the 20's, considered mongoloids, because the swedes thought we were forest-dwelling savages with a funny language unfit for civilized people.

...it is a funny langauge though

>>45
No. They just thought you were Finns (forest-dwelling savages with a funny language unfit for civilized people).

>>39,
please see >>29.

Race can be a good identifying feature. Which is more descriptive, a six foot tall fat man, or a six foot tall white man? The latter, albeit not much moreso.

>>44

you could not be more wrong. please 2 learn about "indo-european"

>>49
44's not the only one. At least 3 others ITT have fked up that one.

For those too lazy to check out places like Wiki (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Indo-European), it's like this:
"Indo-European" is the name of a language family that includes English, Icelandic, the Celtic languages... basically almost all languages found in Europe (the exceptions being Basque, Turkish and Finno-Ugric languages like Finnish, Sami (aka Lapp), Hungarian and a few more) and quite a few on and around the Indian subcontinent. Hence the name "Indo-European".
"Aryan" actually means "Iranian". Apparently some stupid German (or Austrian or whatever) in the early 20th century didn't do his homework, cos he started using "Aryan" about some Germanic tribes instead. Btw, Aryan (or rather, Indo-Aryan) and Germanic are also two groups of Indo-European languages. (English and Icelandic are Germanic languages.)
"Indo-European" used about people usually means people speaking an Indo-European language, esp earlier versions (like 1000+ BC).

Japanese are superior! US should have allied with them and kicked Chink & Soviet butt together until there be non left. Also with coupled effort of best US and Japanese scientist we could have developed all manner of nuclear and biological weapons before anyone else. Then we could have brought Germany to it's knees with nukes integrate it to our empire, stole their cool uniforms and make Swastika symbol of true freedom. Brits would be integrated to our empire with their noble elite executed. After all is done we should slave Africa, make our own empire into libertarian dictatorship and proclaim ourselves gods. Finally we should focus on making our superior white and Japanese races into immortal machine men, start conquering space, breed cat eared shota and loli sex slaves etc. It would have been most awesome and decadent nation ever. Superior to anything, even Ancient Romans and Greeks.

>>51
That's one kind of fucking insane.

>>51
nah, we'll just sell them our culture thanks