Return Styles: Pseud0ch, Terminal, Valhalla, NES, Geocities, Blue Moon.

Pages: 1-

Sick and tired of faggets

Name: Anonymous 2006-07-09 21:31

sick of it

Name: Anonymous 2006-07-09 21:44

>>1
Suicide is answer

Name: Anonymous 2006-07-09 23:03

>>2
I don't want to die too soon, so the only logical solution is a faggocaust.

Name: Anonymous 2006-07-10 3:38

THEY HAVE SEX WITH OTHER MEN WHATS UP WITH THAT

Name: Anonymous 2006-07-10 4:15

LET THEM
MEANS MORE WOMEN FOR US
DO THE FUCKING MATH YOU STUPID AMERICAN

Name: Anonymous 2006-07-10 15:15

We must ship all homosexuals to a lost island

Name: Anonymous 2006-07-10 15:26

The Greeks and Romans were cool with it. 

Name: Anonymous 2006-07-10 15:48

>>7
Greeks were more than cool with it. It was encouraged and it was thought that only men could experience true love. Also young boys often had older man as lover and it was thought to be very important for the boy to become a real man. Women were only for breeding. Being brilliant philosopher's and scientist Ancient Greeks were totally right on this subject. Man and boylove is superior.

Name: Xel 2006-07-10 18:02

>>8 I dunno what that long love poem  from the bible is called in English, cuz I've only read it in Swedish, but one interpretation is that it is a little descriptive of gay love. The Quran is full of buttsechs inuendos as well. The only reason there is still gaybashing in christian countries is due to gender roles and that the bible had to shun everything the romans were up to - including playing with the hershey tunnel. History is always fun.

Name: Anonymous 2006-07-10 19:58

>>1

U LIKE BUMCRACK ARRRRRR!

Name: Anonymous 2006-07-10 20:13

Whether you are gay or not is irrelevant. What matters is whether you are a good or a bad person and this does relate to gay people and it is often connected by the fact that some gay people are pathologically desperate to deny facts in order to describe their condition.

Just face the facts, being gay IS unnatural. We are sexually attracted to people because it is the natural urge to reproduce. Of course homophobes think this fact means gay people are inferior or whatever, this fact means nothing to people who are not homophobes and fearing that the truth itself somehow hurts you is paranoid. If anything you should concentrate on proving that this fact is irrelevant rather than trying to circumvent reality.

Name: Anonymous 2006-07-10 20:25

>>11
Humans themselves are natural and thus incapable of acting unnaturally. Well, maybe PETA dudes and some extreme socialist are acting unnaturally, since they fight against law of nature. Note also that many gays happen to have that subconsious urge to reproduce(as proven by demand for gay adoption etc.) and that urge itself is not directly to related to sexuality.

Name: Anonymous 2006-07-10 20:56

>>12
Whether something is natural or unnatural has no bearing on whether it is right or wrong. This is the fact you should be outlining and since it is true it is much easier than trying to deny reality. Condescending people like me who are not homophobic by trying to prove something which is obviously not true is not the way to go, no matter how angry you feel.

I saw right through your charade! You are using ambiguity in an attempt to jumble up the 2 definitions of the word natural.
Like this.

1: Do you like bush?
2: I like them clean shaven.
1: YOU WANT TO KILL THE PRESIDENT!! ARREST HIM PERSECUTE HIM!!! PERSECUTE!

I am talking about the function of sexuality in nature and the fact that homosexuality is a malfunction. This doesn't mean it is wrong, not wanting to have children is unnatural, but people are free to do it.

Name: Anonymous 2006-07-10 21:10

>>13
Don't discard fact that animals do have sex for fun. Including gaysex. One could say that both gays and straight people have  "unnatural" sexuality, since bi seems to be more natural.

Name: Anonymous 2006-07-10 22:03

>>14
The purpose of sex is to make reproduction fun so males and females do it, just like eating nutritious food is fun, to make you do it. Why would nature want you to stick your cock into a part of the body that faeces passes through?

Name: Anonymous 2006-07-10 22:19

>>15
So animals having gay sex is unnatural too? Just what is natural then?

Name: Anonymous 2006-07-10 23:02

>>16
Animals that waste energy on gay sex are less likely to survive and are more at risk to infection, thus they are not favoured by natural selection.

At this point of the debate my argument is so grounded in fact your apologetic attitude makes you look stupid rather than just desperate to deny reality.

Name: Anonymous 2006-07-11 0:35

>>17
>>My Argument is so based on relative moralism I can suck my own dick. In the future.

Fix'd

Name: Anonymous 2006-07-11 14:57

>>18
My argument is so weak I have to resort to name calling.*

fix'd

Name: Anonymous 2006-07-11 15:21

BONOBOS

GOOGLE IT

Natural meaning occurs in nature.

case closed. near all sexual fetishes are natural.

Name: Anonymous 2006-07-11 15:36

>>20
That doesn't stop gay sex from being detrimental to the species.

Name: Anonymous 2006-07-11 15:41

Who the hell gives a shit anyway? It's not like they're stealing all your ladies.

Name: Anonymous 2006-07-11 21:32

>>9
 its called song of solomon or song of songs- there are a couple of others names for it as well.

Name: Anonymous 2006-07-12 2:19

Jews were shocked to find out that gayness is superior and thus they had to ban it by use of religion.

Name: Anonymous 2006-07-12 17:55

>>21
>That doesn't stop gay sex from being detrimental to the species.

Umm...detrimental to the species? Of humanity?
How exactly does the man-love* threaten Homo Sapiens? (There's a pun in there somewhere but I don't care enough to find it.)

*or teh woman-love

Name: Anonymous 2006-07-13 0:28

>>25
Look up detrimental in the dictionary.

Name: Anonymous 2006-07-13 2:06

>>26
My apologies.

From dictionary.com:
det·ri·men·tal (dĕt'rə-mĕn'tl)
adj.

Causing damage or harm; injurious.

also:

threat·en (thrĕt'n) pronunciation

v., -ened, -en·ing, -ens.

v.tr.

   1. To express a threat against.
   2. To be a source of danger to; menace.
   3. To give signs or warning of; portend.
   4. To announce the possibility of in a threat.

v.intr.

   1. To express or use threats.
   2. To indicate danger or harm.

Do you see something I don't see?

Name: Anonymous 2006-07-13 2:08

>>27
If everyone was gay and we never had real sex the human species would die out. .. or we'd have to resort to creating test tube babies. 

Name: Anonymous 2006-07-13 2:08

err that is to say, heterosexuality furthers the existance of humanity.  to threaten it's prevalence is to threaten humanity.

Name: Anonymous 2006-07-13 2:25

>>28
That's true, but the very nature of being gay precludes the act of spreading that particular trait (I read somewhere that there's actually a gene for it, it was probably proven wrong by now butI'll post it later if I find it.)
The problem, in essence, solves itself. Humanity is saved.

Name: Anonymous 2006-07-13 2:42

>>27
Yes, being gay serves a slightly detrimental purpose for the propogation of the species and so is unnatural.

Gays could help catch game to feed other people's children or something like any other heterosexual, but there have been many gays in the past with mutations that made them superior but who did not pass those genes on. It would have been better off if they were not gay.

The mutation that makes me allergic to nickel is unnatural and I am willing to admit this, I am offended by the fact that you are leaving me with my pants down and forcing me to stand alone in the face of those stupid people who have a problem with minor mutations such as this.

Name: Xel 2006-07-13 4:01

Do we need *more* people on the planet? Really? REALLY? Satan fuck it, just, let, them, adopt! Kids of gay couples don't become gay. And we're is that precious gene that causes gay? Where is the proof that gay people "recruit"? You need to go into a pragmatic extreme in order for humanity to die out, and we are already BI to begin with. "They should help catch game for other's children"... Are you guys real or am I having a nightmare?

Name: Anonymous 2006-07-13 5:09

>>28
Or used women for breeding? It's not black and white issue.

Name: Anonymous 2006-07-13 14:19

>>31
>Yes, being gay serves a slightly detrimental purpose for the propogation of the species and so is unnatural.
Touche! I never looked at it that way. However, that really can only slow down humanity's genetic progress a little. With over 7 billion people on the planet, how long before whatever superior traits the gay individual had occurs in a heterosexual individual? Unless you're in a rush to evolve into God, I wouldn't worry about it.
>>32
>Do we need *more* people on the planet?
I often think that way myself :). Sadly, I think we're due for a nuclear war any year now. We've got enough kooks in power for it. That ought to reduce the populus by quite a bit...*gulp*

Name: Anonymous 2006-07-13 14:31

>>34
over-population = loss of wealth per person, poverty then starvation.

Gayness may be unnatural, but it may well be good for the well being of sentient life.

Name: Xel 2006-07-13 15:17

>>35 The least common relationship in most somewhat evolved animals is heterosexual monogamy. Last time I checked, the only animals that have been eradicated is because of consumers not demanding of capitalism to watch its step.

Name: Anonymous 2006-07-13 16:02

>>36
The parental unit is natural in humans, most couples divorce after all their kids are the age of 4+ when in the wild they would have mobile independance from their mother. Women prefer their husbands to be monogamous so all of his resources are devoted to her and their children. Men of course want to be polygamous, but also have a maternal instinct towards their children which encourages monogamy.

Name: Anonymous 2006-07-13 21:50

I would prefer if all my fellow men were gay.  I'd have all the women to myself... :D

Name: Anonymous 2006-07-13 23:25

>>38
I would prefer if all my fellow men were gay.  I'd have all the men to myself... :D*

fix'd
Don't change these.
Name: Email:
Entire Thread Thread List
All trademarks and copyrights on this site are owned by their respective parties. All comments and posts are the responsibility of their own posters.
- Tinychan + 2ch Mode -